Am I the only one who worked at a no-name boutique IB and had zero problem going UMM buyside?

I'm at a (solid - but not namebrand) IB boutique in a Tier 1 city. Over the past could of months I have gotten a whole lot of outreach for MM IB, EB IB and LMM-UMM PE. Now granted not all inbound recruiter mail was for anything remotely interesting and some were just casual email blasts, but ultimately I was able to sign up a great offer with a >$20B AUM PE shop in NYC. I only got one final offer but I had another final round lined up with a $5-$10B AUM shop in Boston as well. 


I get that if I wanted to work at KKR or Goldman Sachs they'd have more interest in other people from BBs, but given that I have no interest to hack it out with the KKR or Goldman Sachs types, have rarely worked 80+ hours/week and still ended up at a namebrand UMM shop - my question is this - outside of the Top 10 bubble, are there diminishing returns of working for a sweaty MM versus a boutique? There seems to be very little value-add to me at a certain point and I do feel that some things I hear first-years or recruit weenies say on hear is just abject wrong in my personal experience. Am I just the luckiest man alive or has anyone shared this experience?


Edit: I cleaned this up a good bit because I drank too much coffee and was a dbag, rant artist in my initial post. 

 

Ofc this is just me, everyone has their preferences, but state school -> mm boutique with good culture and lighter hours -> mm pe seems like such a steal. Hope this track gets more attention at places like my alma mater (RU/PSU/OSU).

 

At one of those schools headed to a MM hc boutique lol. Would love to hear your perspective in DMs or something

 

Is it possible to make it at a boutique in NYC from a place like rutgers or University of Maryland? How hard would it be?

 

Feel you on this. Fucking hate "elite" personas. Ive truly met very very few HYPSW/GS/McK/KKR/Bx people that aren't superficial/insecure/lame 

Yeah I mean I respect the work ethic and all that but I do not want to get scoffed at for leaving before 7PM lol. 

 

My 2 cents. It's a little bubble that people can get trapped in, something like HYP -> GS/MS -> KKR/BX or bust. To those caught in it, it's inconceivable any kind of finance exists outside of that. Not that it's a bad goal, but not everyone wants that path. There is just as much success and money without it.

Congrats on the new gig. All the best.

 

Not in PE but I went to a LMM and got an exit-op as good as anything from a BB. I think the difference is that if you're from a LMM bank, you have to hustle to land a good position but you can still do it. If you're at a BB, you can kind of coast and still get something good.

Most people on here are not good at hustling. Hence, the preference for what looks like a sure thing.

 

I feel like being at a BB/EB is similar to being at a target. Once you’re in, there is a relatively clear path to UMM/MF (if you want that) and generally more recruiter inbounds. In the same sense being at a no name is kind of like a non-target, you have to put in a bit more work. But at the end of the day if you want it bad enough you can make it happen. Congrats on the new gig!

 
Most Helpful

I’m genuinely having a tough time wrapping my head around this. OP recently graduated from Generic State U… started his career at a no-name boutique investment bank in NYC… and already signed a $20B AUM PE offer 6 weeks into his first year because they were interested in the M&A experience he got during training while taking FINRA exams? Am I missing something? My understanding was that even MM PE is a challenge for people at established MM/EB/BB banks? Congrats OP I guess everything I knew about finance is wrong. I’m from a target school and at a (relatively good lifestyle) MM IB and I haven’t been drowning in UMM PE messages so I guess I just suck. 

 

WestCoastMonkeyMan

My thought process also. Would love a comment from more experienced monkeys

The reason it's hard to get consensus is because their are too many other independent variables. Some people need the boost a Goldman or Harvard provides others find a way with less. 

 

Huh? I'm 14 months into the job and most of my inbounds started ramping up around 12 months in.

Who said anything about generic state university? I wouldn't have the same analysis when it comes to going to a target vs. non-target school. IMO the cost-benefit is way better for an elite school than an elite bank just because it's really friggin easy to get A's in high-school and once you actually get in it's not like you have to crank 80-100 weeks to do well at Stanford or USC. 

Also I would imagine your group plays a huge role. If you're doing a bunch of cap raises at a FIG shop that's gonna be a diff. world than Tech M&A is right now. 

Only other thing I would mention is having a great LinkedIn prof. can make a big difference. Do you include the right buzzwords in your profile to get the maximum amount of views in recruiter searches? I know having CEO testimonials on my page helps as well (even if their companies were only ~$75mm EV when we sold them). Also, will you connect with recruiters and have a chat with them just to be kept in mind for future gigs even if their initial email isn't your cup of tea?

 

Targeting MM rn, interested in hearing about your hours since you said you have a relatively good lifestyle

Normal day is like 8:30AM - 9:00PM, Fridays I'm typically out by 7 but might need to log on over the weekend to make up for it. Exaggerating a bit when I saw I've never worked 80 hours a week in my life. I've probably brushed up against it and beyond, albeit less than 5 times probably over the course of the past 12 months. Average is like 60 hours with 70 being a shitty week. 

 

 I haven't been drowning in UMM PE messages so I guess I just suck. 

100% the case. As verified by the fact that you can't read. Where in the post does OP say he went to a non-target school? Also, his profile says A2, as in a second-year. 

 

Would agree that PE is not guaranteed even at a bulge bracket....so would caution people from thinking that it is a sure shot from a smaller boutique. I personally find that many of the mid-market PE shops are quite "non-diverse" and so while the state school--->small boutique--->PE strategy may work for someone who is "one of the guys" and fits in "culturally", the rest of us may need the credential boost provided by a larger institution to get a shot. 

 

Preferably a tiered ranking and hearsay justifications for each ranking position.

Thanks!

 

can someone give a list of  the no  named regional boutiques that are solid

Dawg use Axial

 

For me, one big difference is I'll making a % of what analysts at BB/EB/reputable MMs are making. If I don't get into an UMM firm, I don't get to make that $. I'm a money hungry guy, and I don't mind working 80-90 hours a week if I get top dollars in this industry for a few years.

Yeah that's fair play. I think Associates where I'm at clear like $100K less than at BBs with what I'm reading these days in the $325-400 range. 

 
kppw1517

I'm wracking my head here trying to think of the non-namebrand boutiques that focus on Tech M&A in tier 1 cities. Are you like sandbagging here and at Qatalyst/Liontree/Raine or at something like Union Square Advisors/FT Partners?

There are a dime a dozen, just do an Axial search on it. Someone on here asked if the name of the firm I'm at starts with an S. I assume they're talking about Scura Partners, which is an occasional competitor of ours. Something in that league. 

 

Essentially, I applied to one job on their website and they liked my resume enough to call. I got on well with the recruiter and I guess made a good impression. It seems as though they kept me in some type of CRM or sales log as a good potential recruit to place successfully because although the initial role wasn't a great fit they would periodically call for something they thought would be a fit. They pitched me probably 3 duds but also the one gig I ended up taking an offer on.

If you want to reply with your username I can ping you the name of the recruiting firm via DM because they were great for me. Your mileage may vary. 
 

Interviews were both pretty similar. Couple virtual interviews and an excel test and case study. Both excel case studies were timed but they let you pick a time slot over the weekend to do it. One had a powerpoint case study component to present a recommendation as well. The other was a pretty simple three-statement M&A model that they gave 30 minutes for. Final rounds were in person which was dope, although I only went to one. 

 

Would love to hear the name of the recruiter. Sometimes some of the most interesting opportunities are sourced outside of the HSP/ CPIs of the world. 

Congrats on your offer. I can’t say I had a similar PE recruiting experience as you. I definitely struggled. 

 

Qui in repellendus minima qui sit temporibus fugiat. Sit molestias ad in consequatur fugiat. Voluptatem voluptatem sit illo optio unde. Dolor ducimus laboriosam omnis rem aut labore. Quo et rerum ad aut accusantium eligendi. Cupiditate et sit eveniet enim.

 

Provident eum quas beatae earum qui a nihil. Dolore saepe ratione aspernatur.

Et eum earum aliquam iure. Nihil id placeat sunt quae iure. Quia provident laborum dolor dolor ipsum vitae.

Reprehenderit animi corrupti et iusto omnis et qui omnis. Sed assumenda qui doloremque voluptas maiores doloribus veritatis ipsum. Autem reiciendis dicta ut. Delectus asperiores ea eligendi magni excepturi aspernatur.

Molestias adipisci quidem cumque cum. Quia ratione voluptas accusantium occaecati ducimus quia vitae. Voluptatum nemo quisquam possimus sunt. Vitae tempora iusto et omnis earum.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”