Analyst Troubles

I've been working with an analyst for about a year now, and he seems to be struggling with the more technical aspects of the job and listening to instructions. I try to mentor him and go through the mistakes he's making, and he constantly says "I get it now, thanks" only to make the same mistakes again. In addition, when there are nuances to a certain task, I try to lay out what they are, but he misses some of them each time. I can tell it's wearing on him and that he's feeling discouraged. He's a nice guy and puts in the effort with a good attitude, but he just doesn't seem to "get it". How do you all work with and mentor an analyst that seems to be struggling like this?

 
Most Helpful

I've been on both sides of this. When I was a first year I would often just say "Ah yes I understand, thanks" even if I didnt fully understand mostly due to lack of confidence or being embarrassed that I didnt grasp what was being explained to me. Now in my second year when I had to train a new hire on some things, I noticed they did the same thing. I would walk them through something and they would tell me they got it, only for them to not do it correctly or ask me a few days later to explain it again. 

Now when I walk someone through something or show them how to do something, I'll ask them to replicate what I did or explain it back to me. If they can do that while im still watching them then I know they got it, rather than just hearing them say they understand when they really dont and leaving them to try to figure it out. Also give them lots of Ritalin.  

 

Good for you for going out of your way for wanting to help this kid. This is such a rare attitude these days in the corporate world. I can name only a handful of people who are this kind. Good job

 

How much have you worked with them directly in the past year and what has their live deal experience been like?

 

A few things:

  • You need to have more frequent check-ins to ensure they don’t screw stuff up. Encourage them to do a chunk of work then come to you before going deep down a rabbit hole with something that doesn’t make sense.
  • You need to win the analyst over so they want to put forward good work for you and they trust your feedback is coming from a place of a good work product/you doing your job place versus you being someone who sucks to work with or focusing on stupid details and just exerting control to make them feel bad.

Ultimately IB and finance has some of the worst managers I have ever seen because bad managers can get away with it and the analysts are generally so self managing and correcting. However, if you get one who is a bit slower or struggling you need to actually do your job and be a manager motivating them and providing them strategies to succeed. This only works if they trust you though and genuinely view your relationship as positive. Sadly, when I was an analyst there was only 2 senior analysts, 1 associate and 1 VP I worked with during my entire 2 years who I felt I had this relationship with. In this relationship the analyst genuinely wants their feedback and to make them proud because the analyst trusts they knew more than then them and they would have your back. If you can win the analysts over and they have full confidence you are 1) trying to get a good work product 2) are more knowledgeable than them and 3)  wouldn’t have them do something stupid and will protect them, they will run through a wall for you.

 

Great post. Couldn't agree more on the manager topic - in IB it's totally common to make it to MD with absolutely zero leadership/management training or experience. Maybe you're staffer for a year or have to somewhat wrangle analysts who don't technically report to you into making books, but it's so silly how little management focus there is. No reason you can't cluster analysts in twos or threes and have them report to separate VPs who have been trained on people management. Feels like an obvious hole that creates terrible managers and culture that IB literally doesn't give a shit about.

 

I do think we have that kind of trust built up as I never ever throw him under the bus. I think he doesn’t want to ask questions for fear of looking dumb, but at the same time he clearly needs to pay closer attention to instructions. Its frustrating, but I think the main takeaway from everyone is to be a bit more “micro manager”, which I don’t like as I always found that to be annoying when I was an analyst. Its a line I certainly struggle with because I don’t want to be overbearing and bossy.

 

If you have a good relationship, try looking at the problem more objectively and less from a feedback angle. Try this sort of script:

  • hey girl/guy, you got a sec, want to chat about our communication styles and what you think is working versus not working.
  • sure
  • “I’m trying to figure out how to make this as easy as possible and eliminate turns so we both have an easier time. What do you think is working/ not working when we work together?
  • they likely will inform you they are lost with certain deliverables or they will say everything is going great.
  • give them positive feedback: “one thing I think we are doing great is attitude, personally I like working with you and you seem like a good guy/girl.” Or “I appreciate x about you” 
  • they say thanks
  • “the one area I find myself scratching my head a bit is sometimes I feel like we are not on the same page with a deliverable and I’m trying to figure out how I can better communicate what I want better to you or where we think there is a communication break down.
  • they might bring up an example. If they don’t, you can. for example, the last turn of the CIP we just totally whiffed on communicating with each other. In that circumstance, did you think you were doing it correctly and then it was a surprise that it wasn’t what I was thinking or were you not sure and you were afraid to check in to get clarity?
  • The might just ramble or be silent and afraid to say something. 
  • Ask what you think “we” can do better to problem solve communication whiffs. If they don’t have a solution, suggest doing part of a task and checking it. “From my experience, I feel like often when I got instructions early in a career I was just trying to process what my manager was saying then I’d work on the task for 15 minutes and have a bunch more questions. Maybe, going forward after you work on something for a bit and make some headway we check-in to make sure things are going the correct direction.

Your issue is almost certainly the analyst is afraid to check in/ doesn’t want to feel stupid and you aren’t doing a good enough job of making them feel comfortable to ask clarifying questions. No one wants to be bad at their job and people don’t intentionally make errors, so you need to coach them to align with your work style. The more you have those little check-ins and the more comfortable they get, the less you will need them and the more they will just intuitively understand what to do.

Also, yes there are some analysts who really “don’t get it” but from my experience that’s actually very rare. More often, the analysts that are stamped with the “don’t get it” name are ones who just haven’t had the chance to get a good manager or been given enough reps to put together a professional work product. If someone trusts you as a manager and doesn’t want to fail you even the biggest Potato of an analyst will put together good work. Carrot almost always works better than the stick.

 

People above covered it well, but this analyst is going to need to find a system that works for them. In these situations, I take 2-3x the time I would with a “quicker” analyst to explain things, I have them take detailed, annotated notes on the pages themselves, give them plenty of reference materials, etc. They’re going to have to find what works for them, all you can do is try to help them find that. I know this isn’t sage advice but until they find their ‘system’ they’re gonna screw up. 

 

Associates terrified that they might have to actually do some work for once

 

Yeah I should just continue doing the same work I’ve done for the past ~3 years rather than teach you how to do it so you can pass it along to the….never mind. 

 

One thing I appreciate my associates doing is laying out next steps in a clear way. This can be done via a summarized email, PowerPoint slides, etc but some system so I, the analyst, can follow instructions in a clear way. This helps since there are things an MD or VP might say, but I might not understand and so it would help to have clarification and what to prioritize 

 

I do agree, it was useful for me when I was an A1, especially when starting on a new project

Something that gets a bit frustrating though now that I manage A1 is that some of them seem to be completely unable to remember things on their own. For example, if you send a summary email of what to do, they somewhat get it. But then if your VP brings something else and you come by their desk to tell them verbally, they say “ok,will do” but if they don’t process immediately then they would just forget it. 
 

It’s also up to you to get organised in terms of deliverables

 

Really 2 options that I would try here.  First, I would have a coming to Jesus meeting w/ him.  Not reaming him out, but laying out where he's falling short and telling him that "I get it now - thanks" isn't the right response if he doesn't get it...Gotta tell me that you don't get it so that I can explain it and you can actually get it.  This assumes that you're still interested in mentoring him and think he can become a solid contributor. 

If you're not interested in mentoring him anymore and don't think that he's gonna be a contributor, stop picking him for your deal / pitch teams.  If it seems that he's incapable of getting it and is content to yes-man you when he doesn't get it, it's probably a waste of your time to go out of your way to develop him as an analyst.

Option #2 is tough if you like the kid and think he has a good attitude, but candidly it doesn't seem that he's interested in getting it.  In my experience, the better analysts don't go w/ the "Yeah - that makes sense" tact unless they actually understand the concept.  If they don't understand something, they will ask you questions (at the risk of looking dumb) until they do get it.  Honestly, if a first-year isn't regularly asking me questions, I assume that he either (a) thinks he's the smartest guy in the room while not actually knowing shit, (ii) has no awareness of the holes in his knowledge base and doesn't think he needs to ask questions (which is a terrible sign), or (iii) isn't particularly interested in learning.  Guys w/ any of those thought processes aren't guys I'm betting will be an asset to the group or worth my time to mentor.

I come from down in the valley, where mister when you're young, they bring you up to do like your daddy done
 

One thing that gets annoying though is (and this is better than not asking questions at all, but still annoying) when they ask questions but always come to you directly for basic PPT/XLS things. Ffs, if you message me “I’m completely lost” and ask me to come to your desk to show you how to do a combo chart on XLS or make something transparent, it may be good to use google or ask other 1As first 

For 7) I know people do this but this is a waster of paper/resources… Personally got used to checking PDFs and it works just as well. Actually a best practice is before sending something, open the attachment in your email and check it again. 

 

Fugit totam ab ab dolor. In ab id aut consectetur commodi et. Commodi vitae quia repudiandae voluptatem. Occaecati est ad quaerat et voluptatem officia. Quia culpa repellat recusandae qui ducimus possimus cumque. Ab minus omnis id id porro quidem. Dolores pariatur adipisci modi reiciendis nulla aut natus placeat.

Voluptates hic optio distinctio. Deleniti sequi nostrum illum quibusdam ut. Labore voluptatem possimus magni excepturi repudiandae non exercitationem.

Nulla unde voluptas possimus. Sunt pariatur nemo vel laboriosam.

Culpa id ut eos ad. Aliquam quam quaerat porro optio aliquam non odit voluptas. Sequi totam fugit eos voluptatem impedit. Tempore laboriosam sunt quia vero aut delectus tempora. Voluptatibus dolores quas sequi labore similique. Consequatur laudantium nostrum ad in et velit saepe.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
10
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”