Hello,
I was hoping someone could explain a rough WC approximation I came across during my internship. The analyst took the following as a rough proxy for WC:
Receipts from customers - payments made to suppliers - EBITDA
Could someone explain the intuition here please?
| +138 | UBS Catastrophic Q1-Q3 26, M&A -17%, Outside Top 10 in Americas, EMEA & APAC | 38 | 1m |
| +59 | PWP acquisition by Piper cancelled | 23 | 1h |
| +46 | No return offer - UPDATE. | 11 | 17h |
| +29 | Evercore poaches Baird DC Defense Team | 18 | 20h |
| +28 | Houston banking Gods ? | 16 | 2d |
| +21 | Normal for lateral process to go +2 months? | 4 | 1d |
| +21 | Best Houston Banks for Culture in 2026 | 14 | 16h |
| +18 | Lack of talent in IB! | 19 | 7h |
| +17 | Internal lateral from coverage to M&A (focused on coverage) | 4 | 21h |
| +15 | How standard is weekend work in IBD? | 7 | 3h |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
bump
I don’t get why you would do that - if you have the detail necessary for recipes/payments I’d bet you have the info necessary to just calculate actual net working capital
Intuitively I’m not sure that formula makes sense anyways
Don't know that I agree with the methodology, but I think the idea is to capture:
(Cash coming in) - (Cash going out) - (Net change that flows through I/S), so that the WC that's being used in a calculation off of Net Income or EBITDA isn't "double-counting" what's already flowing through the I/S.
Again, think there are several level of assumptions that need to be made here for this to be a fair approach / I would probably not use this as an approximation.
One of the analysts went through it with me at the time and it made sense but I have forgotten his explanation. It did however, ring along the lines of your explanation.
Magnam expedita rerum beatae consequuntur. Velit quod omnis sint quo sint recusandae. Molestiae quasi corrupti laborum aspernatur corporis cum aliquid. Molestiae dolorem dicta veritatis. Accusantium eos numquam nemo adipisci sit delectus. Illum et sit maiores quibusdam temporibus. Sunt ut itaque deleniti odio esse eaque reiciendis accusamus.
Occaecati quis iure dignissimos vero. Quos qui voluptatem libero a. Est esse laboriosam sunt molestiae quaerat.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...