Associates, how thoroughly are you checking analysts’ work?
Are you hitting F2 on every cell? Or do you only jump in when something looks “off” visually? Need to know for my own purposes, unsure of how hard my work is supposed to be scrutinized.
Are you hitting F2 on every cell? Or do you only jump in when something looks “off” visually? Need to know for my own purposes, unsure of how hard my work is supposed to be scrutinized.
| +192 | Change My Mind: Banks Shouldn’t Hire Foreigners at All | 51 | 25m |
| +126 | Article - UBS’ Investment Bank Keeps Losing Ground | 22 | 20m |
| +60 | An Exhaustive Guide: How to Solve Every Single Accretion/Dilution Question | 6 | 7m |
| +46 | When to Leave Office as Intern | 5 | 42m |
| +41 | Best IB Group Overall? | 25 | 10h |
| +31 | STEM student lost in London IB recruiting | 16 | 43m |
| +30 | Would you rather be a Touse Squid or a Bouse Mogger in IB | 2 | 1d |
| +25 | What do you say to ppl who don’t know EVR/LAZ/CVP/PJT | 22 | 14h |
| +20 | Still recruiting SA'27 | 12 | 1h |
| +20 | Help a Rising Sophomore at Non-Target | 7 | 23h |
Career Resources
Depends on the analyst. If it’s my first time working with them and i don’t know their reputation, I’ll go thru things very closely. Helps establish a baseline of expectations.
If they’re known to do good work, you can look less closely.
Above all always consider effort vs reward
But you’re still checking, right? There’s an associate that refuses to check work… makes it difficult working with them. I assume it’s because bonuses are coming up and they have an offer/are planning on leaving after, but still annoying.
Not the original responder but yes, I sanity check work even if the analyst is amazing. Ultimately, if the analyst messes up, the associate will take the heat (usually) and the ones that put all the blame on the analyst tend to be disliked. Think it’s beneficial to check work unless the associate wants the person above them to catch a mistake to make a point.
Ignore title. Aso3. Depends on Analyst and level of trust. A few thoughts below, but basically it helps immensely if things are formatted well as to be easy to audit. The work needs to be "right" first and foremost, but you should also think about what the does output mean and what is it tied to (either in the same workbook or on a slide):
Rerum eos quia autem molestiae hic. Excepturi illum voluptatem et quia. Maxime sed eos omnis aut unde distinctio occaecati. Dolor vel illum dolore sed. Consequuntur aut asperiores ea molestiae ea reprehenderit.
Vero sed iure veniam eveniet qui aut non. Voluptas cupiditate sed qui ullam quas est totam dolorem. Eum consequatur illo non aspernatur officia a veritatis. Rem autem omnis labore sit voluptatum ex.
Rem et excepturi quasi aut aut ab. Ab culpa nihil voluptas sed aliquam veniam voluptatum nulla. Voluptatum perferendis sed qui illum vel qui. Consequatur et minima tenetur facere culpa deserunt. Aut magni fuga vero est amet quam nostrum. Rerum alias minus et. Et est dolorem eaque facere dicta quia.
Aperiam expedita commodi quia fuga ea qui nihil. Reprehenderit porro voluptatem aliquam ut hic quas velit. Ut est in quisquam. Velit ducimus non quod nobis eligendi omnis. Architecto in quidem fuga.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...