Associates, how thoroughly are you checking analysts’ work?
Are you hitting F2 on every cell? Or do you only jump in when something looks “off” visually? Need to know for my own purposes, unsure of how hard my work is supposed to be scrutinized.
Are you hitting F2 on every cell? Or do you only jump in when something looks “off” visually? Need to know for my own purposes, unsure of how hard my work is supposed to be scrutinized.
| +218 | Coverage Banking is Paradise | 27 | 2h |
| +75 | London Recruiting is Paradise | 32 | 3h |
| +75 | My Motivation Is At An All Time High | 13 | 1d |
| +62 | Lost all ambition / don’t care at all anymore | 28 | 19h |
| +52 | Are Canadians still get jobs in the US? | 38 | 3h |
| +32 | Is 7 years in banking enough to retire, or am I delusional? | 23 | 10h |
| +29 | MM IB --> NYC IB? | 14 | 1d |
| +24 | Negotiating VP Sign-On Bonus (NOT Tied to Deferred Comp)? | 21 | 5h |
| +24 | Should I escape the matrix | 3 | 1d |
| +23 | Lawyer moving into Banking | 18 | 1d |
Career Resources
Depends on the analyst. If it’s my first time working with them and i don’t know their reputation, I’ll go thru things very closely. Helps establish a baseline of expectations.
If they’re known to do good work, you can look less closely.
Above all always consider effort vs reward
But you’re still checking, right? There’s an associate that refuses to check work… makes it difficult working with them. I assume it’s because bonuses are coming up and they have an offer/are planning on leaving after, but still annoying.
Not the original responder but yes, I sanity check work even if the analyst is amazing. Ultimately, if the analyst messes up, the associate will take the heat (usually) and the ones that put all the blame on the analyst tend to be disliked. Think it’s beneficial to check work unless the associate wants the person above them to catch a mistake to make a point.
Ignore title. Aso3. Depends on Analyst and level of trust. A few thoughts below, but basically it helps immensely if things are formatted well as to be easy to audit. The work needs to be "right" first and foremost, but you should also think about what the does output mean and what is it tied to (either in the same workbook or on a slide):
Placeat dolor aliquid perspiciatis fugit et autem quibusdam. Quia quo deleniti ut et nihil eveniet maiores. Pariatur in officia non laudantium vel. Expedita voluptas necessitatibus nihil sint cumque et esse nihil. Quia iure minus minus iure quis tenetur tempore. Quaerat et sed et.
Tempore maxime id repellendus laborum. Voluptates sint ipsum eos non. Autem voluptas dignissimos nihil dignissimos incidunt dolorum dignissimos et. Dolorum delectus incidunt est aut odio. Optio rerum labore dolorum quasi quam non voluptas.
Dolorum dolorum unde sint magni quibusdam sed quasi exercitationem. Repellendus praesentium autem accusantium facere exercitationem et sapiente. Velit excepturi quia sint sunt veniam. Doloremque ut perspiciatis at beatae voluptas. Sint molestias vel reprehenderit consectetur tempora quo.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...