Barclays NY vs DB SF

Thoughts on which offer to accept for SA 2022? Barclays NY is a platform offer, DB SF is for TMT, and MS NY is a GCM platform offer. My thoughts:

  • Barclays is probably stronger than DB in most areas, but I'd still have to go through group placement. My school has close to no alumni in the top groups, so placement into a top group is far from guaranteed.

  • TMT, especially tech, is without a doubt the most interesting industry for me, so DB SF is super appealing with that. The culture in that office is also great and the people in that office are also great.

 

If you want to do TMT and like the people at DB seems like you know what you want to do. One nice thing as u probably know about Barclays is each coverage group does their own M&A execution tho.

 

How has no one asked this yet: do you want to live in nyc or SF? These banks will be comparable exit and pay wise so it comes down to where you want to live and culture of the group. Barclays ny generally has a good culture but you might get placed into one of the few groups (industrials/tech?) that doesnt have the best culture. I have friends at barc ny in other groups and they said they have great culture but don't know anyone in tech/ind which people on wso have said are rough culture-wise.

 

DB tech is probably DB’s strongest platform, definitely consider it as your first choice if you want tech. 
 

Honestly, risk adjusting for group placement, I would take DB tech over taking Barclays and hoping to get placed into tech. Tech is one of the most sought after industry groups (especially for Barclays who happens to have a strong NY tech group relative to SF) and I would argue the difference in prestige/exits between DB and Barc TMT is not big enough to risk it. 
 

I also think SF is super underrated and a no brainer if you want tech buyside exits (although NY tech exits for VC and GE are getting better and larger in number than 5 years ago). 

 

Some alum from my nontarget school got screwed over by Barc NY placement and ended up with some weird group that's half S/T half IB, anecdotal but just my .02

 

Barclays tech NY is significantly better than DB tech SF. Tech at Barclays is pretty sought after, so you need to be okay with networking with other groups and potentially going to them if you pick Barclays. If you absolutely want tech and don't want to risk industrials fig etc at Barclays, go with DB.

 

I'm friends with a PE associate that was in Barclays tech NY for 2-3 years. He said hours were on the higher side but culture was great. Did you work in the group?

 

To me this is a no-brainer in favor of Barclays. If anyone disagrees with below plz comment rather than MS. Put simply (and happy to expand below):

  1. Barclays >>> Deutsche Bank on a brand name basis. Don’t think it’s that close. At my top target, you barely see anyone go to DB these days but Barc remains highly sought after.
  1. NYC >>> SF. I have only heard stories of people doing summers in SF and switching to NYC full time, never the other way around. Keep in mind this is a large sample size of people who interned across finance, tech, and consulting.
  1. Barclays Tech > Deutsche Bank Tech. Just look at the recent exits.

Main Counterargument: Barclays group placement.

Yeah, it sucks. But if you got an offer you don’t have a serious leg down over other people. Just be scrappy and don’t get complacent. Start early.

 
Most Helpful

Can shine some light, currently at an EB Tech group in PA.

1. No one gives a shit. All you younglings care way too much about splitting hairs between banks. Once you actually start working in the industry you'll quickly realize no one really cares about what bank you work at, and as for PE recruiting it's a lot more about analyst preparedness and skill than you realize. It's not really Top Tier BB > Mid Tier BB > Low Tier BB for PE recruiting as you youngsters think, it's literally just 2 tiers: GS/MS (Where analysts are able to get attention from HHs purely just from name brand rather than resume) and all other BBs.

2. SF >>> NYC for Tech. The vast majority of reputable Tech groups are in the Bay Area for a reason. If OP is set on Tech the Bay Area is far better than NYC.

3. Goes back to point 1. Also, from my personal observations DB SF Tech is no slouch, their WC placement is solid.

 
  • I don’t think saying Barc > DB is revolutionary. This isn’t splitting hairs between Barc and BAML or GS and MS - I am also not a fan of the rankings threads.
  • Re-read OP’s post. If committed to tech BANKING, then yes SF > NYC. However if they’re just going to leave after 2 years, there are equal if not more investor roles in NYC.
  • My point still stands that from a quality of life perspective, I have only seen people prefer NYC to SF.
 

this seems like a west coast vs. east coast decision. I'd go with DB TMT (especially) if you want WC exits. Barclays placement process is pretty unreliable if you don't have a strong alumni network. 

 

Is Barclays Tech generally one of the more coveted groups?

 

Yes Barclays tech is a top group at the firm now. Them and HC get a ton of interest. But doable if you network early.

 

Debitis qui vero a eum ut eum eius. Velit voluptatum eaque eos ipsam quia. Aut maxime quod nesciunt eligendi consequatur similique. Voluptatem rerum aut ut eveniet deserunt.

Molestiae velit blanditiis voluptatem necessitatibus et. Cumque est cupiditate repudiandae aut ut architecto.

 

Vero doloremque praesentium qui reprehenderit possimus voluptatum officiis. Sapiente repellendus qui sit nulla atque ratione necessitatibus incidunt. Veritatis voluptas dolor dolorum sunt nisi quo adipisci. Facilis qui non aperiam non illo quibusdam.

Blanditiis asperiores ea sed. Et qui at ipsam cupiditate voluptas neque. Sit voluptates consectetur adipisci dignissimos iste. Molestias debitis enim fuga error. Eos earum ut ea rerum veritatis labore. Cum officia dicta quis alias porro doloremque.

Career Advancement Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. (++) 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (13) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (202) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (144) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”