BB FIG vs MBB for PE+HF

Hi guys,

What would you take as a first job to secure a good position at a top PE/HF two years down the road, BB FIG or MBB? The BB is good but not GS.

I have some IB and Buyside internships and I DO care about the lifestyle ;).

Thanks

 
Best Response

I would say BB FIG all the way. You mention you care about the lifestyle...which is a red flag. Neither consulting or IB is going to be a good lifestyle. IB: working all the time, maybe sunday off if that. Consulting: traveling 6 days a week. You need to take that into consideration.

That being said, and mind you...I don't like to admit this, but at the current moment, I have found many PE firms are looking at consulting candidates because of the situation in our corporate world. Either way, you are gonna be a good position.

XX
 

Pike, if you manage to get into PE from a consulting background, will you ever catch up to your peers from BB IBD backgrounds in terms of analytical/modeling skills?

 

Actually Pike, its more likely that if you get a day off in banking its a Saturday. Sunday is usually a big work day because you need to get stuff done for Monday.

Also, depending on the BB and location (regional vs NYC), MBB can all be better than BB FIG (it depends on the group and the firm). Each situation is different, and the question is a little broad. There's no way you can adequately answer this question without more information. Also, PE and HF recruiting are quite different.

 

So does FIG really pidgeonhole you for PE/HF recruiting? I've heard arguments both ways: one one hand, financial institutions have unique models, and hence the skills learned from FIG modeling are not directly applicable to other industries. On the other hand, analytical skills are analytical skills, and given that FIG is arguably more complex than most industries (and since FIG groups tend to do their own M&A), analysts coming out of FIG groups are well-positioned for post-banking recruiting.

Thoughts?

 
blackopsmonkey:
So does FIG really pidgeonhole you for PE/HF recruiting? I've heard arguments both ways: one one hand, financial institutions have unique models, and hence the skills learned from FIG modeling are not directly applicable to other industries. On the other hand, analytical skills are analytical skills, and given that FIG is arguably more complex than most industries (and since FIG groups tend to do their own M&A), analysts coming out of FIG groups are well-positioned for post-banking recruiting.

Thoughts?

When I'm analysing a financial institution, I'm looking at net interest income, the loan portfolio quality, book value and possible impairments, maturity profile of liabilities and costs of funding, regulatory requirements, risk weighted assets and solvency ratios (Tier 1/2 capital etc).

When I'm looking at a "normal" company, I'm looking at their sources and customer concentration in revenue, gross profit and EBITDA margins, flexibility in cost structure, cyclicality in working capital, capex intensity, and the capital structure.

Completely different skillset in both. A FIG analyst may not ever even come across the word EBITDA.

 
Awon Eleyi Awon Eleyi Won Bad Gan:
blackopsmonkey:
So does FIG really pidgeonhole you for PE/HF recruiting? I've heard arguments both ways: one one hand, financial institutions have unique models, and hence the skills learned from FIG modeling are not directly applicable to other industries. On the other hand, analytical skills are analytical skills, and given that FIG is arguably more complex than most industries (and since FIG groups tend to do their own M&A), analysts coming out of FIG groups are well-positioned for post-banking recruiting.

Thoughts?

When I'm analysing a financial institution, I'm looking at net interest income, the loan portfolio quality, book value and possible impairments, maturity profile of liabilities and costs of funding, regulatory requirements, risk weighted assets and solvency ratios (Tier 1/2 capital etc).

When I'm looking at a "normal" company, I'm looking at their sources and customer concentration in revenue, gross profit and EBITDA margins, flexibility in cost structure, cyclicality in working capital, capex intensity, and the capital structure.

Completely different skillset in both. A FIG analyst may not ever even come across the word EBITDA.

FIG analysts place unbelievably well in PE... I have a few friends who worked in FIG and got Megafund offers and they don't focus on FIG in their new roles...

 

Guys thank you for your answers. Here is some more information: The Location for the FIG group is a continental HQ and the BB is strong. The issue is that I know everybody who interned in this IB told me: "Just make sure you don't go to FIG, these guys get killed WAY more than the other chimps."

I have some friends who worked at MBB in my country and I can tell you the lifestyle is MUCH better than IB (they don't travel that much, maybe this is because I am not from the US).

 

I'd say FIG analysts are inherently disadvantaged when it comes to megafund recruiting. Think about it, the M&A analyst will live and breathe EBITDA and modeling skills/lingo relevant in PE in the 6 months leading to megafund interviews, while you'll be trying to grasp what are maturity profiles of liabilities. You'll also be busting your ass off working in FIG so won't have much time to study LBOs and prep for buyside recruiting.

But GS FIG places extremely well. Where is the MBB office at?

 

Distinctio repellendus qui consequuntur omnis. Qui quaerat ut quisquam et iste iusto consectetur neque. Quaerat voluptatem quis quo ducimus voluptatem tempora aliquam. Sit soluta minima non omnis.

In deserunt in dolores voluptatem ipsa id. Et et debitis rerum in repudiandae ut. Odio occaecati fuga repellendus ex ea exercitationem aut. Aut sed recusandae quis velit dignissimos.

Nam minima vel quis ut. Quia doloremque in quaerat quis est id quia veniam. Earum doloribus consequatur autem est numquam rerum. In maxime laudantium doloribus repellendus in odit. Adipisci sint architecto qui cum optio.

Facilis officia dolorum numquam est ab repellat minus. Sint quo beatae voluptatem voluptatem eum. Maiores dolores voluptatem dolores quasi deserunt in. Et necessitatibus voluptatem recusandae corporis.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 04 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (20) $385
  • Associates (88) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (67) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
Kenny_Powers_CFA's picture
Kenny_Powers_CFA
98.8
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”