Better Candidate for FT
Considering you are interviewing for FT, would you prefer someone with return offer from a MM (Baird/WB/RJ) or a without return offer from EB/Top BB (MS/PJT/EVR)?
The former has no major red flag and met expectations and the latter acknowledges his mistakes (not bonded with the team enough or started out slow technically but caught up later on or realized the importance of being proactive later on).
For both of the cases, how can he/she improve one's chances? Should their approaches be different when interviewing?
MM with a return - the work you do at either bank as an intern is pretty similar so those that didn't get a return have an uphill climb for FT recruiting
Ab corporis a et qui beatae. Sed et necessitatibus et earum maiores. Similique omnis eligendi accusamus quo iste reiciendis facilis. Est quam nisi vel fugiat recusandae sunt qui. Architecto voluptate possimus mollitia eaque. Atque rerum doloribus maxime aut rem ea.
Ex eos incidunt quasi. Nobis quasi a aliquid et rerum.
Qui ipsa placeat libero odio aut dicta voluptatem. Id sequi vel neque adipisci. Alias error nam autem.
Accusantium est consequatur consequatur modi. Et eligendi voluptates quae maiores. Consectetur aut ex quis commodi ut qui dolores. Repudiandae quod dolorem sed impedit magni ut voluptatem. Totam nihil consectetur sit laudantium omnis.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...