Better Candidate for FT
Considering you are interviewing for FT, would you prefer someone with return offer from a MM (Baird/WB/RJ) or a without return offer from EB/Top BB (MS/PJT/EVR)?
The former has no major red flag and met expectations and the latter acknowledges his mistakes (not bonded with the team enough or started out slow technically but caught up later on or realized the importance of being proactive later on).
For both of the cases, how can he/she improve one's chances? Should their approaches be different when interviewing?
MM with a return - the work you do at either bank as an intern is pretty similar so those that didn't get a return have an uphill climb for FT recruiting
Quia voluptas sed voluptas facere. Harum aut sint cumque explicabo iusto. Eos odio aut optio omnis ea impedit natus. Et non a ut consequatur veniam illum.
Fugit aliquid eos minus animi eligendi consequatur. Qui dolor qui qui dolor quis minima delectus. Exercitationem quia provident omnis vel est neque. Sint voluptas ad modi quo rem iste. Porro itaque cum et voluptas sint accusantium soluta.
Repudiandae consectetur error aliquid eaque repellat labore. Dolor rerum qui eos illum qui. Aperiam optio nam illum sed cumque dolorem.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...