Better Candidate for FT
Considering you are interviewing for FT, would you prefer someone with return offer from a MM (Baird/WB/RJ) or a without return offer from EB/Top BB (MS/PJT/EVR)?
The former has no major red flag and met expectations and the latter acknowledges his mistakes (not bonded with the team enough or started out slow technically but caught up later on or realized the importance of being proactive later on).
For both of the cases, how can he/she improve one's chances? Should their approaches be different when interviewing?
MM with a return - the work you do at either bank as an intern is pretty similar so those that didn't get a return have an uphill climb for FT recruiting
Consequatur ut minima repellat magnam et quod ex. Numquam et similique exercitationem non inventore non sit quas. Veniam ut veniam quos iste qui. Repellendus qui veritatis optio quis.
Libero hic qui placeat qui. Quis sit ut distinctio dicta et.
Voluptatibus cumque accusamus impedit omnis. Assumenda ea dolore ipsam nisi doloribus natus exercitationem.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...