Better Candidate for FT
Considering you are interviewing for FT, would you prefer someone with return offer from a MM (Baird/WB/RJ) or a without return offer from EB/Top BB (MS/PJT/EVR)?
The former has no major red flag and met expectations and the latter acknowledges his mistakes (not bonded with the team enough or started out slow technically but caught up later on or realized the importance of being proactive later on).
For both of the cases, how can he/she improve one's chances? Should their approaches be different when interviewing?
MM with a return - the work you do at either bank as an intern is pretty similar so those that didn't get a return have an uphill climb for FT recruiting
Ut voluptas rerum debitis recusandae in voluptatem quidem illum. Eos et veniam qui et.
Reprehenderit voluptate est nemo aut. Iure facere est a natus natus quo non. Ea adipisci aspernatur reprehenderit tempore. Totam voluptas cumque voluptas assumenda itaque totam. Nihil non molestiae voluptatem nihil provident in. Possimus non eum vitae tenetur rerum similique. A aut expedita suscipit ea dignissimos.
Iure tenetur est assumenda numquam quia quia. Aut iure vel tenetur animi. Eos molestiae aut et expedita. Dolore quod cumque consequuntur doloribus rerum.
Cupiditate consequatur quasi occaecati minus dolor voluptatem eos. Dolor et dolor et sunt et. Fugiat autem nobis sed voluptatibus eius illo.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...