67 Comments
 

UBS should just outsource everything directly to Hyderabad and Pune, imagine the cost savings 

 

BLUF: The credible strategy is not moving every UBS employee to India. They appear to be relocating virtually every repeatable production, technology, analytical and administrative task to India. UBS could move an additional 25,000 high-cost positions, create 18,000 Indian roles and generate approximately $3.5 billion of recurring annual savings.

They are positioning to make India the default location for every role that does not require local client access, or licensing. UBS had about 24,000 people in its Indian service organization post CS integration, and UBS is adding another 2,000 employees in Hyderabad. 

UBS could eliminate approximately 25,000 more positions in the US, Switzerland, UK and other expensive locations and replace them with  18,000 positions in India after standardization, consolidation and AI-driven productivity improvements.

Relocation By Job role

Technology, data, testing and infrastructure

9,000 (US/UK/Swiss) to 6,750 in India

Operations, finance and product control

8,000 (US/UK/Swiss) to 5,200 in India

Risk, compliance and legal production

4,000 (US/UK/Swiss) to 3,200 in India

IB, wealth and asset-management analytics

3,000 (US/UK/Swiss) to 2,400 in India

HR, procurement and administration

1,000 (US/UK/Swiss) to 450 in India

Total

25,000 (US/UK/Swiss) to 18,000 in India

This would produce a net global workforce reduction of approximately 7,000 positions while expanding UBS’s Indian workforce into the low-40,000 range.

Hyderabad would receive approximately 12,000 of the additional jobs, with another 6,000 split between Pune and Navi Mumbai to provide resilience. Hyderabad would become UBS’s primary global technology and production center, while Pune would serve as the active backup rather than concentrating every critical function in one city.

UBS appears to be position itself for an India-first location policy:

  • Every non-client-facing opening defaults to India.
  • Hiring approval in New York, London or Zurich requiring bussiness segment CFO or COO approval.
  • Most departing support employees in high-cost markets are replaced in India.
  • External consultants and contractors are replaced with UBS India employees.
  • No process is transferred one-for-one; each process removes at least 20–30% of its staffing requirement through automation and simplification.
  • Executive compensation is tied to location-strategy and cost-removal targets.

In investment banking, India-based teams would perform most valuation work, financial-model construction, trading and transaction comparables, pitchbook preparation, screening, data-room administration, diligence tracking, KYC preparation and recurring client materials. Onshore teams would retain client relationships, negotiation, judgment, committee presentations and final responsibility.

UBS would maintain a smaller onshore IB analyst class about 25–35% of today’s intake to preserve its future VP and MD pipeline. H-1B sponsorship would largely be reserved for specialized or genuinely client-facing talent rather than junior production roles.

Item

Annual impact

Eliminate 25,000 high-cost positions at $185,000 average cost

$4.63 billion

Add 18,000 India positions at $50,000 fully loaded cost

$(0.90) billion

Additional governance, cybersecurity and resilience costs

$(0.35) billion

Real-estate and vendor consolidation savings

$0.20 billion

Net recurring annual savings

$3.58 billion

UBS reported 99,085 internal FTEs, $14.96 billion of personnel expense for the first half of 2026 and an underlying cost/income ratio of approximately 70%. A $3.4–$3.6 billion reduction would lower annualized personnel and related expenses by roughly 11% and could reduce the cost/income ratio by approximately six percentage points to around 64%, assuming constant revenue.

Estimated implementation costs would be approximately $4.4 billion:

  • $1.5 billion of severance and retention costs.
  • $1.1 billion of duplicate staffing during migration.
  • $650 million for secure facilities and technology.
  • $350 million for recruitment and training.
  • $250 million for regulatory, legal and data-transfer work.
  • $550 million of contingency and program-management expense.

The program would reach full savings by 2030, break even approximately 3.5 years after launch and generate an estimated seven-year NPV of roughly $7 billion at a 10% discount rate. Once fully implemented, annual after-tax earnings could increase by approximately $2.7 billion.

UBS could not legally or commercially relocate everything. The following would remain in relevant markets:

  • Financial advisers, relationship managers and senior coverage bankers.
  • Salespeople, traders and locally registered supervisors.
  • Branch and domestic Swiss banking employees.
  • Legal-entity CEOs, CROs, compliance officers and regulatory-relations personnel.
  • Final credit, market-risk, compliance and investment decisions.
  • Essential recovery capacity for systemically important operations.

FINMA, PRA and FINRA rules allow extensive outsourcing but leave UBS responsible for supervision, audit access, data security, continuity and regulatory compliance. 






 

 

Swiss imposed Capital requirements are not high enough to punish UBS bad behavior and heavy offshoring

 

UBS likely creates 4 year clawbacks that if you voluntarily leave prior to 4 years being up you have to give back at least $100k in bonuses to refund their H1B fee

 

UBS should just copy the Gulf States and safeguard passports (wouldn’t want them getting lost during the 120 hour workweek) 

 

UBS fucked over the American half of their 2022 intern class who had signed return offer contracts and were supposed to start in July 2023.

Less than a month before the July 2023 class was supposed to start (and after everyone had already signed expensive leases in NYC), they deferred the employment start date of half of the group by seven months to February 2024. How did they decide who to defer? Allegedly these decisions were primarily made by HR and were based on citizenship status, with non Americans favored (aka zero internationals were deferred). 

The deferred class finally started in February 2024 (7 months later). The group that started in July 2023 was generally promoted to associate by July 2025, while the deferred class was told they had to work 2.5 years instead of 2 for the associate promotion.  So the deferred class missed out on 7 months of analyst comp and now is a full year behind in salary for the rest of their career. 

tldr: UBS recently didn’t honor their signed return offers for half the analyst class, allegedly based on citizenship status with non Americans explicitly favored over Americans, which carried over to future promotion timelines :) 

 

If they are willing to do this an offer from them means nothing. Don’t feel bad about renegging

 

Because having a workforce of indians with thick accents is a winning strategy in US m&a, particularly with huge money being spent on infra, defense tech and space.  All those companies love Indian m&a advisors!

 
Most Helpful

Nothing ever happens. No mass deportations, no ending H1B, no ending illegal immigration. 

Trump (10 years ago) in 2016: “I will end forever the use of the H-1B as a cheap labor program, and institute an absolute requirement to hire American workers first for every visa and immigration program. No exceptions.”


Guess what? He didn’t do shit on immigration. He’s never gonna do shit.

He did make $1B of dumping his crypto and NFTs on bagholding suckers though!  

 

There is 0 intent for this to get upheld.  Trump doesn't want to hurt businesses that rely on H1b.  He's just pandering to his base.  If it were likely to be upheld, he'd pull it.

 

ICE raid on EMA to get rid of hundreds of H1Bs there? Yes please 

 

Ignore Title (Currently AN1 at BB as an international grad)

Blatant racism and inaccuracy. UBS barely sponsors at the entry level for incoming new grads and have been clamping down considerably, with most BBs and EBs following suit. (Most UBS job postings during my recruiting cycle clearly said no on sponsorship)

Sad to see that you're attributing your mediocrity to a group of people who have to work thrice as hard just to be able to afford the same opportunities as you.

Pure Cope.

 

dude what's this anti-immigrant hysteria. You are not a redneck earning 40k$, god damn it, you supposedly should understand economy if you are a banker.  immigrants generate 25% of US patents, your grandad probably was an immigrant. Any hard-working person in good health with capital and skills is a net benefit to US human capital, economy, consumer spending, cultural influence, tax base. And On average for international to compete with American, he/she needs to be much better than American as Americans possess structural advantages with their cultural fluency and self-presentation skills. 


 

 

Lmao the whole reason why internationals get hired on OPT/H1B is not because they’re better. It’s because employers have leverage over an employee who is now dependent on their employment to remain in the country. 

It allows employers to push those workers far more than local employees because essentially they have more leverage over them. It's a very ugly system. We need to get rid of it. 

 

Most internationals at ubs use a cpt visa, they are taking college classes and granted temporary work authorization.  It's a total scam. Stephen Miller actually basically cancelled the program this month so I hope it has a huge effect.

 

My UBS bullpen has a large group that speak Chinese to talk bad about people in group while in the bullpen and only socialize or talk to their own Chinese group

 

As AI reduces the need for white collar labor, it is critical that the US government deport / denaturalize recent immigrants so that americans can keep / find high paying jobs.

The days of labor shortages, outside of a few specialized areas of which IB is not one, are over with AI.

Without actions to tighten the labor market, the unemployment rate will become intolerably high in the coming years, and there will be increased motivation for deportations and, if a democrat wins the next election, potentially UBI.

Outside the job market, letting too many immigrants in also raises inflation of housing, energy, healthcare, and everything else. Part of the reason inflation was so high during Biden as people were coming in legally and illegally by the millions.

 

I don't care about Dems or Reps, but I hate when people twist economic facts. Inflation was high during Biden's term because of Quantitative Easing, when the Fed printed trillions. And it happened all over the world, not just in the USA, so it had nothing to do with immigrants.

People say the unemployment rate will become intolerably high, the same was said by the person who sold ice when the refrigerator was invented, or the horse-cab owner when railways were invented. Jobs come and go. 100 years ago, accounting departments employed 10x more people, but with the advent of computers, that number was reduced. Did we get mass unemployment? No, when the cost of doing something reduces, demand explodes. Employment in finance and commerce has exploded since then.

And also - US is not Hong-Kong it has ample land! Its density is actually the lowest among developed countries. The only reason why housing is expensive is due to stupid zoning laws, rent freeze, bureaucracy and other idiotic things. 

Houston Metro area added 700k people in last 5 years, growing its population by 10%. Its prices grew less than New York metro area where population actually declined. Housing price has everything to do with regulations and little to do with population. Population only starts matter only when u reach Singapore or Hong-Kong level density with 30k people over square mile which will never happen in USA

I guess this forum just loves huge government intervention in everything as long as it supposedly benefits them. 

 

“Immigrants depress wages and raise housing costs!”

God I love seeing bankers demonstrate 0 empiricism. Justifies our pod’s decision to just hire out of school now

 

This is the most retarded comment on the site.

There are plenty of legitimate reasons to dislike immigration, particularly social, but if you genuinely believe the reasons you stated then you are cooked.

The country benefits from mass economies of scale. The entire economy is built for scale, massively reducing the population suddenly would lead to fewer high paid jobs per capita.

You’d also need a supermajority to denaturalise citizens, given this is unconstitutional on a mass scale. It’s not something the admin can just do lol.

I don’t know if it’s Covid, the sellside or AI but this generation is actually hands in feet retarded. Astounding stuff. And they wonder why large hedge funds will still pay the 100k for internationals 

 

How come nobody talks about one very specific example of how it shortchanges Americans? Rather than an Indian contractor team, the research department hires Americans as CONTRACTORS through a third party staffing agency, pays them sometimes lower for the exact same job functions, promotes them slower, limits their client interactions and makes them jump through hurdles to get converted full-time, and gets insane leverage over them under the pretext of headcount shortage because of the integration. But afaik this practice dates back even before the merger. I’m talking Americans who are fully capable with the same backgrounds as everyone else, went through the standard hiring process, not the contracting agency hiring process, working for a top ranked senior analyst and somehow talked into working as contractors “because there’s a headcount situation”. By any estimate ~1/4 of the floor is staffed by American contractors

 

Omnis quae sed aut maiores. Culpa rerum accusantium consectetur in veniam vitae laborum. Dolorem natus et sint amet odio nobis. Et fuga voluptatem unde aliquid quam.

Autem eum quia illum provident. Magnam dicta at quae non animi iusto. Consequatur velit quo sed sit aut. Eaque et voluptate qui et fugiat.

Cumque at quae velit sapiente. Et dolores incidunt ipsum eos ad consequatur reprehenderit. Qui tenetur porro aut libero in.

Eveniet nostrum enim sed occaecati. Eius ut autem laborum eos. Quam adipisci et cum esse soluta et et. Id quo perferendis quisquam deleniti qui.

 

Dicta illo autem cum quam dolor cumque omnis quisquam. Aut cupiditate quia iste debitis tenetur impedit incidunt. Ullam assumenda sequi magnam consequuntur.

Ducimus quis voluptatem optio dolor eum. Et nobis vel nesciunt molestiae consequatur excepturi. Beatae omnis non qui cum.

Commodi odit vel praesentium. Rerum sequi porro odio sed non maxime. Repellendus consequuntur qui atque similique libero consequatur.

Cumque quos eum alias mollitia aut minus sunt. Ad est deserunt laudantium quis error mollitia. Molestiae excepturi mollitia ullam maxime. Assumenda id explicabo nam asperiores occaecati. Cum dolores ut illum autem rem. Repudiandae dignissimos eaque voluptatem sit molestiae dolorem.

Career Advancement Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.3%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 03 98.9%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.3%

Professional Growth Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.3%

Total Avg Compensation

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (51) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (26) $182
  • Intern/Summer Associate (15) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”