Big 4 restructuring vs. banking restructuring (and exit ops)

Hey guys,

1. What are the main differences between Big 4 restructuring and restructuring at a bank? I have heard of one Big 4 Restructuring group doing doing distressed M&A deals, but do all of them do this?

2. Does anyone have any insight into exit ops from Big 4 restructuring? Do some exit into distressed debt PE/hedge funds? Would a mega fund like Oak Tree take a guy straight from Big 4 restructuring or no?

I have heard of some folks hopping over to Restructuring groups at banks after a Big 4 Restructuring gig (heard of one top 3 Rx group that took a big 4 restructuring guy), but I'm not sure if it is necessarily common. Appreciate any insight.

14 Comments
 

Big 4 works on those RX deals but just do the accounting side of it. The investment bank (Laz, BX, HLHZ etc) do the actual advising on how to actually approach the situation. For example in a Chapter 7, a bank may make assumptions on what the value will be in a liquidation scenario but will hire the accountants (Big 4 RX group) to do the actual calculation on how much Acc Receivables/inventory/PP&E etc. can be recovered and sold off for.

Basically the bankers strategize up the game plan and then hire the accountants to "verify the numbers".

 
Best Response
monkeyleverage

Big 4 works on those RX deals but just do the accounting side of it. The investment bank (Laz, BX, HLHZ etc) do the actual advising on how to actually approach the situation. For example in a Chapter 7, a bank may make assumptions on what the value will be in a liquidation scenario but will hire the accountants (Big 4 RX group) to do the actual calculation on how much Acc Receivables/inventory/PP&E etc. can be recovered and sold off for.

Basically the bankers strategize up the game plan and then hire the accountants to "verify the numbers".

Apparently you missed the fact that Big 4 (along with several other regional firms) have turnaround and restructuring advisory practices that are not "just the accounting side of it".

 

@Blue-Tooth Tony - Do you know how often Big 4 firms act as a financial restructuring advisors? I've done some research and have seen that EY has been the financial restructuring advisor for the City of Detroit, but haven't heard of any other major deals where a Big 4 firm worked in this capacity. Is this a one-off type of thing or is it common for these shops to act in this capacity (or are they mostly on the operational restructuring side of things)?

Do you have any insight into exit opportunities (is PE common)? Appreciate any insight or guidance you can provide.

 
monkeyleverage

Big 4 works on those RX deals but just do the accounting side of it. The investment bank (Laz, BX, HLHZ etc) do the actual advising on how to actually approach the situation. For example in a Chapter 7, a bank may make assumptions on what the value will be in a liquidation scenario but will hire the accountants (Big 4 RX group) to do the actual calculation on how much Acc Receivables/inventory/PP&E etc. can be recovered and sold off for.

Basically the bankers strategize up the game plan and then hire the accountants to "verify the numbers".

This is not accurate. I have not been checking the league table for restructuring recently, but last time I did KPMG in Europe was well positioned (think top 5). Back in 2012, also, I interviewed for Morgan Stanley Restructuring group and the guy told me that sometimes they do joint-deal with Big 4 or compete with them on others. All in all, I believe it is always better to do the job in a bank/boutique for salary, exit opps and prestige (if you believe this to be important) but the difference in restructuring between banks & big 4 is lower than in normal M&A/corporate finance engagements.

I'm grateful that I have two middle fingers, I only wish I had more.
 
cruel3a monkeyleverage:

Big 4 works on those RX deals but just do the accounting side of it. The investment bank (Laz, BX, HLHZ etc) do the actual advising on how to actually approach the situation. For example in a Chapter 7, a bank may make assumptions on what the value will be in a liquidation scenario but will hire the accountants (Big 4 RX group) to do the actual calculation on how much Acc Receivables/inventory/PP&E etc. can be recovered and sold off for.

Basically the bankers strategize up the game plan and then hire the accountants to "verify the numbers".

This is not accurate. I have not been checking the league table for restructuring recently, but last time I did KPMG in Europe was well positioned (think top 5). Back in 2012, also, I interviewed for Morgan Stanley Restructuring group and the guy told me that sometimes they do joint-deal with Big 4 or compete with them on others.
All in all, I believe it is always better to do the job in a bank/boutique for salary, exit opps and prestige (if you believe this to be important) but the difference in restructuring between banks & big 4 is lower than in normal M&A/corporate finance engagements.

Sorry but I beg to differ. Look at this league table if you think I'm lying. http://dmi.thomsonreuters.com/Content/Files/4Q2013_Distressed_Debt_Bank…

Btw, Morgan Stanley's RX group only exists in EMEA, not in the US, and the big 4 restructuring advisory work is also mostly in EMEA - the US Big 4 only works on the accounting side of RX deals. This is the same reason why Big 4 TAS is highly regarded in Europe (with decent exit opps), whereas in the US it's viewed as a job you get if you can't make it to banking.

However I do agree with you that the difference in RX between big 4 and banks is lower than in normal M&A. Regards.

 

Praesentium quibusdam placeat repellat necessitatibus est nobis. Ipsam voluptas quia cumque eum hic architecto optio. Nesciunt placeat harum adipisci qui doloribus. Eligendi quia qui aut corporis sapiente magni officiis. Ipsum autem aut id occaecati voluptas facere in praesentium.

Cupiditate voluptas qui odit rerum amet. Tempore nostrum id dolore sit laborum iusto. Odit sunt odit dolores perspiciatis est quibusdam tenetur ipsa.

Vel doloribus recusandae et rem porro. Eum optio veritatis aut necessitatibus autem. Quae repudiandae dolorem totam beatae nihil dolor.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (65) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”