Ultimate goal is HF, but I've heard the training in BBs goes a long way. BB is also less risk averse. What is the better choice here? BB is middle of the pack, but does well in the space.
| +238 | UBS preparing for a October Layoff Massacre | 188 | 2d |
| +183 | A Message to Students Who Think this Job Will Fix Their Life | 27 | 9h |
| +155 | Work and Suicide | 48 | 1d |
| +74 | Interns without return offers, careers & perspective | 5 | 1d |
| +56 | Are all these UBS postings bullshit? | 15 | 5h |
| +44 | I'm in love with my MD | 9 | 8h |
| +40 | UBS IB Balance Sheet Set to take a Hit | 10 | 2d |
| +35 | My grandma thinks I work at a Chase branch | 5 | 1d |
| +34 | If Investment Banks Were Divorced Dads | 11 | 1d |
| +31 | Will they pay Directors $1mm+? | 9 | 2h |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
more risk averse*
Go with the BB.
Rationale?
Might help to know a bit more about the HF and what your responsibilities would be
Responsibilities are in-line with most first-year analyst positions. It's a L/S fund that invests in primarily biotech. It's 10-15 years old. I would cover therapeutic areas.
Iste unde mollitia aspernatur. Totam magni tenetur voluptate. Minima suscipit non ullam necessitatibus nobis velit quam.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...