Ultimate goal is HF, but I've heard the training in BBs goes a long way. BB is also less risk averse. What is the better choice here? BB is middle of the pack, but does well in the space.
| +374 | Which Offer to Accept: UBS Analyst Role or Part Time Cashier at the Local Taco Bell | 44 | 6h |
| +291 | Roku-Fox Deal - UBS Misses Out on yet another deals after years chasing this deal | 31 | 6h |
| +272 | TPH V.S. Mizuho [HOU] | 33 | 2h |
| +270 | AI is insane | 38 | 2h |
| +268 | I Snuck Into UBS Office And Took A Shit On The Floor | 26 | 9h |
| +220 | Best Power/Renewables/Energy Teams? | 35 | 4h |
| +202 | Useless associates | 36 | 5h |
| +184 | Differences in Restructuring Teams? | 33 | 6h |
| +181 | Centerview HC group falling off? | 28 | 6h |
| +181 | Actual EB List | 26 | 3h |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
more risk averse*
Go with the BB.
Rationale?
Might help to know a bit more about the HF and what your responsibilities would be
Responsibilities are in-line with most first-year analyst positions. It's a L/S fund that invests in primarily biotech. It's 10-15 years old. I would cover therapeutic areas.
Ea sit nesciunt rerum voluptatum maiores nulla. Repudiandae consequuntur ut nesciunt iure.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...