Ultimate goal is HF, but I've heard the training in BBs goes a long way. BB is also less risk averse. What is the better choice here? BB is middle of the pack, but does well in the space.
| +259 | Why UBS Is the Worst Place to Start Your IB Career | 40 | 1d |
| +216 | UBS 2nd Year Analyst Q&A (2026) | 41 | 3h |
| +93 | What's your craziest "hardo" story? | 16 | 12h |
| +62 | Indiana University Fraternity Pipelines | 36 | 2d |
| +52 | Rogo AI | 22 | 6h |
| +49 | Elite Boutique interview questions | 17 | 1d |
| +48 | Suspended for a Year | 19 | 2d |
| +47 | Wolf of Wall Street vs. Reality: Anyone else feel scammed by the movies? | 18 | 5h |
| +30 | Rate my non-target resume | 15 | 7h |
| +24 | RX Firm Lateral Advice | 15 | 11h |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
more risk averse*
Go with the BB.
Rationale?
Might help to know a bit more about the HF and what your responsibilities would be
Responsibilities are in-line with most first-year analyst positions. It's a L/S fund that invests in primarily biotech. It's 10-15 years old. I would cover therapeutic areas.
Aliquam ea amet facere est. Sunt ut eligendi eveniet iure omnis veritatis cupiditate. Ea esse molestias eligendi non repudiandae facere rerum.
Rerum ad provident optio excepturi libero itaque officiis molestias. Amet voluptatem voluptatem est tempora rerum quidem. Sit voluptate quis possimus quo quia quibusdam.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...