Choosing reviewers

What is the best strategy for choosing performance reviewers? I think it makes sense to choose top performers, but is it better to choose very senior people you have worked with who have clout but you worked with less closely, or associate/VP who were in the trenches with you but have less clout?

2 Comments
 

Ah, the age-old question of selecting the right performance reviewers – it's like choosing the right ingredients for a perfect financial stew. Based on the most helpful WSO content, let's break down the strategy into digestible chunks:

  1. Understand the Purpose of the Review: Before you pick your reviewers, remember the goal of the performance review. It's not just about showcasing your achievements but also about demonstrating your potential for growth and your ability to work well within the team.

  2. Mix of Perspectives: Ideally, you want a blend of both worlds. Senior people can provide a strategic overview of your performance, highlighting your contributions from a high-level perspective. They can attest to your potential for leadership and your fit within the broader organizational goals. On the flip side, those who worked closely with you, like associates or VPs, can provide detailed insights into your day-to-day performance, work ethic, and technical skills. They can vouch for your hands-on abilities and your teamwork skills.

  3. Visibility and Advocacy: Seniority brings visibility. Having a senior person vouch for you can be incredibly beneficial, especially in large organizations where making your mark can be challenging. However, the depth of interaction matters. A senior person who barely knows you might not provide as insightful a review as someone who has seen you in action daily.

  4. Strategic Selection: Think about your career trajectory and the message you want to send through your reviews. If you're aiming for a promotion or a role that requires leadership, having senior reviewers might weigh more. However, if you're focusing on strengthening your technical skills or your role within the team, detailed reviews from direct supervisors or colleagues can be more beneficial.

  5. Quality Over Quantity: It's not just about the title but the quality of the feedback. A well-respected associate or VP who can provide detailed, constructive feedback might be more valuable than a generic nod from someone higher up.

  6. Consider the Culture: Some organizations value hierarchical feedback more, while others appreciate a more holistic view. Align your choices with the organizational culture and the specific criteria of the performance review process.

In conclusion, there's no one-size-fits-all answer, but a balanced approach usually works best. Consider your career goals, the nature of the feedback you're seeking, and the culture of your organization. And remember, it's not just about impressing the reviewers but genuinely using the feedback to grow and excel in your career. Swing from branch to branch wisely, my friend!

Sources: Ways of Underperformance - and how to avoid them (Part 1), Performance of Top Tier vs. Bottom Tier Analysts (Q&A in Comments), Strategy& Ex Employee - Q&A, Strategy& Ex Employee - Q&A, Determining Analyst Performance Reviews

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

Animi excepturi dicta architecto adipisci explicabo ea. Accusamus vero in sed dolor.

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (44) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (78) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (72) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
8
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”