Choosing reviewers
What is the best strategy for choosing performance reviewers? I think it makes sense to choose top performers, but is it better to choose very senior people you have worked with who have clout but you worked with less closely, or associate/VP who were in the trenches with you but have less clout?
Ah, the age-old question of selecting the right performance reviewers – it's like choosing the right ingredients for a perfect financial stew. Based on the most helpful WSO content, let's break down the strategy into digestible chunks:
Understand the Purpose of the Review: Before you pick your reviewers, remember the goal of the performance review. It's not just about showcasing your achievements but also about demonstrating your potential for growth and your ability to work well within the team.
Mix of Perspectives: Ideally, you want a blend of both worlds. Senior people can provide a strategic overview of your performance, highlighting your contributions from a high-level perspective. They can attest to your potential for leadership and your fit within the broader organizational goals. On the flip side, those who worked closely with you, like associates or VPs, can provide detailed insights into your day-to-day performance, work ethic, and technical skills. They can vouch for your hands-on abilities and your teamwork skills.
Visibility and Advocacy: Seniority brings visibility. Having a senior person vouch for you can be incredibly beneficial, especially in large organizations where making your mark can be challenging. However, the depth of interaction matters. A senior person who barely knows you might not provide as insightful a review as someone who has seen you in action daily.
Strategic Selection: Think about your career trajectory and the message you want to send through your reviews. If you're aiming for a promotion or a role that requires leadership, having senior reviewers might weigh more. However, if you're focusing on strengthening your technical skills or your role within the team, detailed reviews from direct supervisors or colleagues can be more beneficial.
Quality Over Quantity: It's not just about the title but the quality of the feedback. A well-respected associate or VP who can provide detailed, constructive feedback might be more valuable than a generic nod from someone higher up.
Consider the Culture: Some organizations value hierarchical feedback more, while others appreciate a more holistic view. Align your choices with the organizational culture and the specific criteria of the performance review process.
In conclusion, there's no one-size-fits-all answer, but a balanced approach usually works best. Consider your career goals, the nature of the feedback you're seeking, and the culture of your organization. And remember, it's not just about impressing the reviewers but genuinely using the feedback to grow and excel in your career. Swing from branch to branch wisely, my friend!
Sources: Ways of Underperformance - and how to avoid them (Part 1), Performance of Top Tier vs. Bottom Tier Analysts (Q&A in Comments), Strategy& Ex Employee - Q&A, Strategy& Ex Employee - Q&A, Determining Analyst Performance Reviews
Animi excepturi dicta architecto adipisci explicabo ea. Accusamus vero in sed dolor.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...