29 Comments
 
Most Helpful

As someone who recently went through the recruiting process I’ll share my thoughts on CS (not claiming to be true or insightful, but will give you a sense of how undergrads are valuing CS).

CS has some very strong groups, namely financial sponsors and leverage finance. Other groups are strong but not top of the street: TMT, industrials, M&A, healthcare. However there are also some groups with reputations of underperforming (real estate, for example). CS tends to do well from exits, especially from top groups, but still mostly in line with Citi, Barclays, and non-top BoA groups.

While most would prefer the other mid-tiers, CS is able to get strong talent because of 1) hopes of landing top groups and 2) they recruit so early and other banks dont usually accelerate until summer so people are “forced” to sign.

The biggest concern about CS is that they will scale back IB in the next 10 years but I think this is unlikely despite what people may think. I’ve heard the opposite anecdotally from CS bankers and there are also instances of CS publicly announcing they will continue to bolster certain IB groups (TMT, for example). Unless there is an exodus of MDs from top groups I would expect CS to continue to compete with the rest of the BBs and hold their spot in the league tables

 

Agreed with above. Top groups are very strong, better than the top groups at barclays, citi, B of A (with some exceptions). Where they fall slightly behind is with their below average groups. The average groups are on par but their bad groups are bad bad.

Overall CS is very strong in enough areas (sponsors and lev fin is great, they punch above their weight class in equity, one of the best at tech after the top tier banks) and I'm sure they'll hold their mid-tier BB spot

 

For some reason WSO rags constantly on CS but the firm has placed really well at UMM and some MF PE over the past 3-4 years (particularly from M&A and FSG, but by no means entirely from those groups), especially compared with other mid-tier BBs (BAML, Citi, Barclays).

I have hard data on this, 789 profiles of PE associates scraped from firm websites and LinkedIn. CS places more people (absolutely and per-capita) at top UMM than BAML, Citi, and Barclays. This may be true for MF as well, but that is harder to say decisively for the biggest MFs, as they don't list associates on their websites and have more people overall on LinkedIn with vague titles.

 

Don't let WSO fool you. CS is highly respected inside the industry and out.

Top groups are lights out for exits and deal flow, and (many people don't realize this) many of the middle-of-the-road coverage groups have great placement as well.

CS also has great culture from what I hear. Good tone set by senior bankers, very few groups are "sweaty" despite strong deal flow

 

This is Reuter’s: “Under Gottstein's predecessor, Tidjane Thiam, Switzerland's second-biggest bank had repositioned itself to focus on wealth management while whittling down its investment bank.

Gottstein now sees "optimisation potential" within Credit Suisse's investment banking and capital markets division, which has posted consecutive losses over recent quarters, but maintained the necessity of keeping the business.”

 

CS is still very well-respected within the finance world. Yes, they have been losing market share in deals, but reputation typically takes a few extra years to catch up to the league tables. The best group is the financial sponsors in terms of placement, but other groups with strong placement are their leveraged finance team (a separate group) and their strong coverage groups (TMT, industrials, and healthcare. I have heard power is solid but don't know too much about the space). The difference with CS and other mid-tier banks, from what I have seen anecdotally, is that CS completely disappears in its weaker markets (like consumer retail). However, placement is more about the candidate. If you are at a coverage or M&A group at any of CS, Citi, BAML, or Barclays, expect looks from virtually every headhunter and private equity firm.

 

Also, CS has the legacy of First Boston and from its reputation in the late 2000s, when it was probably a top 3 bank on the street (and FB was arguably the best M&A house, while DLJ was the best leveraged finance team on the street). It has gotten weaker with time, but the legacy of First Boston and DLJ and the great placement CS had in the 2000s and early 2010s continues today

 

Didn't know that, I always thought CS retail was one of the weaker groups. Generally, the strongest coverage groups at CS are sponsors (basically a product group), TMT, industrials, and healthcare (from what I know, and in no particular order besides that sponsors is considered the strongest). FIG is also strong there from what I know

 

At cumque odit voluptatem qui fugit quia est. Quibusdam modi dolores atque. Adipisci sapiente illo omnis consectetur sed. Ut optio delectus ab sunt perferendis in. Minima omnis quia ducimus. Dolores tempora qui harum beatae et minima.

Voluptatem pariatur dolorum consectetur ipsam excepturi officia aut quo. Aperiam aperiam ut tempora similique. Voluptate qui aut dolorem rerum optio.

Nisi non labore consequatur rerum perferendis magni et. Aut cupiditate aut sed corrupti ipsum qui tenetur ea. Quidem quos facilis vel fuga quo in consequatur.

 

Nulla veritatis recusandae autem eius est quo. Similique sint ut eius placeat nam sed qui. Deserunt fugit ut sint dolorem quia. Ex reprehenderit vero rerum voluptas possimus neque. Sequi facere dolorem officia omnis.

Qui vero eum laudantium omnis recusandae beatae non. Aspernatur rerum recusandae aut asperiores sunt dolores consectetur quia. Eius et aut architecto. Dolore minima omnis omnis adipisci eos ab illum.

Iure sit incidunt pariatur et. Deserunt aut odit ea. Et quis asperiores tempora quia nulla soluta.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.7%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (44) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (79) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”