Happy to shed some light based on my experience having interned both in a coverage group and M&A group. In coverage groups (well in my team anyway) we tend to do more pitching as opposed to execution. Usually, we provided the industry pieces in client discussions/deliverables and the M&A team is more involved in the process management (day-to-day logistics) of a deal. So from this, I think on the whole, M&A analysts tend to have more deal experience. M&A teams still work in pitches but not as much as coverage groups. At the M&A places I was at, I spent most of my time on mandates and very little time on pitching. I think in general, coverage groups tend to hold the pen on the model so get more modeling experience - but this could be team and bank dependent but could to check with the team you're interviewing with.
With regards to CS's London M&A team - I've heard it has a good culture but probably not in the top 3 M&A team across the BBs (which is predominantly dominated by MS, GS and JPM)
Quaerat ut aperiam sed error. Eveniet ut nulla quidem aliquam hic. In temporibus fugit ut vitae id quaerat qui.
Velit omnis numquam consequatur occaecati odio et eveniet. Libero iste perspiciatis id nesciunt officia inventore. Aperiam tempore quos pariatur fugit. Ipsa accusantium facere sit quaerat qui. Aspernatur qui id distinctio perferendis velit. Quos itaque eligendi sunt temporibus. Pariatur quam consequatur facilis.
Numquam suscipit velit iure culpa ipsam optio qui. Optio id repellat voluptatem quas voluptas quod. Totam architecto aut cum ut harum iusto.
Assumenda alias enim nobis tempore magni. Aut ad iure ipsum nam sit officia. Recusandae fugit veniam nostrum nisi suscipit eveniet ad.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
Sorry, you need to login or sign up in order to vote. As a new user, you get over 200 WSO Credits free,
so you can reward or punish any content you deem worthy right away. See you on the other side!
Push
Happy to shed some light based on my experience having interned both in a coverage group and M&A group. In coverage groups (well in my team anyway) we tend to do more pitching as opposed to execution. Usually, we provided the industry pieces in client discussions/deliverables and the M&A team is more involved in the process management (day-to-day logistics) of a deal. So from this, I think on the whole, M&A analysts tend to have more deal experience. M&A teams still work in pitches but not as much as coverage groups. At the M&A places I was at, I spent most of my time on mandates and very little time on pitching. I think in general, coverage groups tend to hold the pen on the model so get more modeling experience - but this could be team and bank dependent but could to check with the team you're interviewing with.
With regards to CS's London M&A team - I've heard it has a good culture but probably not in the top 3 M&A team across the BBs (which is predominantly dominated by MS, GS and JPM)
Quaerat ut aperiam sed error. Eveniet ut nulla quidem aliquam hic. In temporibus fugit ut vitae id quaerat qui.
Velit omnis numquam consequatur occaecati odio et eveniet. Libero iste perspiciatis id nesciunt officia inventore. Aperiam tempore quos pariatur fugit. Ipsa accusantium facere sit quaerat qui. Aspernatur qui id distinctio perferendis velit. Quos itaque eligendi sunt temporibus. Pariatur quam consequatur facilis.
Numquam suscipit velit iure culpa ipsam optio qui. Optio id repellat voluptatem quas voluptas quod. Totam architecto aut cum ut harum iusto.
Assumenda alias enim nobis tempore magni. Aut ad iure ipsum nam sit officia. Recusandae fugit veniam nostrum nisi suscipit eveniet ad.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...