DEI vs Nepotism
del
Trending Content - Off Topic Forum
| +45 | I wish I went to an Ivy | 24 | 1d |
| +38 | How tall are you? | 36 | 5h |
| +27 | EpsteinBooks Dispute: Child Molestation Optimization Process | 4 | 3d |
| +23 | Favorite slop bowl for lunch? | 18 | 1d |
| +16 | Is there a solution to this spam? | 5 | 3d |
| +11 | Deldeldel | 8 | 4d |
| +10 | Andrew Tate was arrested. Thoughts? | 9 | 22h |
| Rough Breakup | 8 | 1d | |
| +8 | Ferda | 1 | 2d |
| +6 | Best UE/Seamless orders? | 1 | 5d |
Career Resources
15 lines of text definitely warrants at least 2 paragraphs.
They're both unfair, but would argue that nepotism is better because the fact it exists is result of the strong business/personal relationships a person or their family has. It wouldn't be a factor if there wasn't some tangible benefit to it on the part of the employer - whether that be stronger relationships with the family or individual's parentage that results in profitable interactions that are seen as a worthy trade off for the employer (or in the case of a family-owned/run business, the management team itself). Picking someone to hire based purely on immutable characteristics does not carry that tangible benefit and in many (not saying most) cases is a net detriment to productivity/profitability. Plus choosing discriminate against candidates based on race is illegal. Wouldn't be surprised to see DEI (in its current form at least) become banned at a national level in the coming decades because of how it violates discrimination law and is abused by corporations.
Laboriosam quibusdam sit libero nam facilis id quia. Itaque culpa ea nisi veniam qui praesentium eligendi. Itaque repellat in minus. Dolorem odio aliquid deleniti ducimus.
Provident tenetur sed consequatur natus. Minus voluptatem rerum ut.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...