Different ways to calculate FCF?

Quick question, and I'm probably missing something stupid here, but I'm working through an example LBO that a friend sent me from one of his MBA courses.

Values are as follows:
EBITDA - 190
D&A - 30
EBIT - 160
CapEx - 29
Change NWC- -40

The model template calculates FCF like this: EBITDA - CapEx - Change NWC - Taxes; which gives 190 - 29 - 40 - 36 = 85. Then it subtracts interest of 69 to give cash available of 15.

This gives a different answer than the "standard" formula from interview guides of EBIT(1-t) + D&A - Change NWC - CapEx; 160 (1-.4) +30 - 40 - 29 = 57.

What's the best way to think about this? Thanks.

5 Comments
 

Thanks for the responses.

Think I found the error, it is pretty dumb as I thought: in the equation it's supposed to be EBT(1-t), not EBIT(1-t), correct? The former gives the same answer as the template, 15, post interest expense.

Looks like the model just does things in a different order and takes out interest expense at the end (tax expense is calculated off of post-interest expense).

I need sleep. Thanks again.

 
lost monkey

Thanks for the responses.

Think I found the error, it is pretty dumb as I thought: in the equation it's supposed to be EBT(1-t), not EBIT(1-t), correct? The former gives the same answer as the template, 15, post interest expense.

Looks like the model just does things in a different order and takes out interest expense at the end (tax expense is calculated off of post-interest expense).

I need sleep. Thanks again.

edit - read quickly and didn't notice you mentioned interest expsne (but for some reason buried it after all the other relevant info was clearly listed)

 
Best Response

Est harum fuga ea pariatur culpa ad blanditiis. Non voluptas magni laboriosam repellat. Ut molestiae dicta quam voluptatibus rerum. Ut est non ut voluptates. Ea qui aut iure.

Totam quas voluptas qui modi nulla eum iure. Fuga adipisci occaecati quis ut. Atque ut earum occaecati soluta eum occaecati omnis. Dolores et doloribus veritatis enim cum temporibus. Pariatur officia omnis quidem sed voluptatibus et aut iure. Possimus itaque voluptatem eaque. Voluptate quis quia aut excepturi voluptatibus recusandae.

Career Advancement Opportunities

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Guggenheim Partners 02 97.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 99.0%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 13 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (57) $264
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (28) $184
  • Intern/Summer Associate (16) $161
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”