Difficulty of making MD at M&A focused MM

A common refrain I see here is that you're better off at a BB vs. an EB because the full-service product suite / compensation structure makes it much easier to reach MD and build up your client book than an EB, where partners/MDs are highly protective of their relationships and lack of non-M&A touchpoints makes it challenging to get in front of clients as a D/junior MD. 

How does this work in MM world, at M&A focused firms like Harris Williams, Lincoln, William Blair, Baird? Don't they have similar issues to EBs? 

2 Comments
 

In the MM world, particularly at M&A-focused firms like Harris Williams, Lincoln International, William Blair, and Baird, the challenges of making MD can indeed mirror some of the dynamics seen at EBs. Here's a breakdown based on the most helpful WSO content:

  1. Client Relationships and MD Path:

    • Similar to EBs, MDs at these MM firms often have strong control over client relationships. This can make it challenging for junior MDs or Directors to break into the client-facing space and build their own book of business.
    • The lack of a full-service product suite (e.g., debt or equity capital markets) limits the touchpoints with clients, which can restrict opportunities for junior MDs to add value outside of M&A transactions.
  2. M&A Focus and Deal Flow:

    • These firms are heavily focused on sell-side M&A, which means the business model is transaction-driven. While this provides a steady flow of deals, it also creates a competitive environment for junior MDs to prove their worth and secure repeat business from clients.
    • Firms like Harris Williams are strictly sell-side M&A, which can further narrow the scope for relationship-building compared to firms with broader service offerings.
  3. Internal Competition:

    • The protective nature of senior MDs over their client relationships is a common refrain in MM firms as well. This can make it difficult for up-and-coming bankers to establish themselves unless they can carve out a niche or bring in new clients.
  4. Differences from EBs:

    • While MM firms share some challenges with EBs, they may offer slightly more flexibility in terms of internal mobility and opportunities to work across different industries or geographies. This can help junior MDs diversify their experience and potentially build relationships in less saturated areas.
  5. Compensation and Structure:

    • Compensation structures at MM firms are generally less lucrative than at BBs or EBs, which can impact the long-term incentives for junior MDs. However, the work-life balance and culture at some MM firms (e.g., Baird) are often seen as more favorable, which might offset some of these challenges.

In summary, making MD at an M&A-focused MM firm does come with hurdles similar to those at EBs, particularly around client relationships and limited service offerings. However, the path can vary significantly depending on the firm's culture, deal flow, and internal dynamics.

Sources: Some Observations from an MD, The Work Always Gets Done, How’s working in Hong Kong?, Questions about VP/D/MD levels at investment banks, Career Bankers: Coverage vs M&A

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

Rerum consequatur nesciunt dolores laboriosam vel architecto. Aperiam pariatur et enim natus aperiam. Est natus sit dignissimos. Qui eum dignissimos suscipit soluta fugit.

Ad non est sed sint vel. Ea est dolores animi molestiae pariatur odit repudiandae.

 

Velit sequi quae provident est. Ea sed vitae accusamus facere ipsam. Facere quas labore velit ut. Eos dicta ad ut ullam vero. Neque ullam optio cupiditate voluptas laboriosam. Nesciunt voluptas cupiditate voluptatem non aut doloremque nihil. Repellat nam pariatur maiores accusamus.

Aut enim a sed. Qui sint accusantium repellat quos repellat eveniet sed sunt. Quam occaecati aliquid et quod omnis quia. Sed sed enim nobis aut autem. Consequuntur quam reiciendis quae enim eum rerum est.

Career Advancement Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 08 97.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.3%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.8%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.3%

Professional Growth Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • JPMorgan No 97.3%

Total Avg Compensation

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (50) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (25) $178
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (75) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”