Difficulty of making MD at M&A focused MM

A common refrain I see here is that you're better off at a BB vs. an EB because the full-service product suite / compensation structure makes it much easier to reach MD and build up your client book than an EB, where partners/MDs are highly protective of their relationships and lack of non-M&A touchpoints makes it challenging to get in front of clients as a D/junior MD. 

How does this work in MM world, at M&A focused firms like Harris Williams, Lincoln, William Blair, Baird? Don't they have similar issues to EBs? 

3 Comments
 

In the MM world, particularly at M&A-focused firms like Harris Williams, Lincoln International, William Blair, and Baird, the challenges of making MD can indeed mirror some of the dynamics seen at EBs. Here's a breakdown based on the most helpful WSO content:

  1. Client Relationships and MD Path:

    • Similar to EBs, MDs at these MM firms often have strong control over client relationships. This can make it challenging for junior MDs or Directors to break into the client-facing space and build their own book of business.
    • The lack of a full-service product suite (e.g., debt or equity capital markets) limits the touchpoints with clients, which can restrict opportunities for junior MDs to add value outside of M&A transactions.
  2. M&A Focus and Deal Flow:

    • These firms are heavily focused on sell-side M&A, which means the business model is transaction-driven. While this provides a steady flow of deals, it also creates a competitive environment for junior MDs to prove their worth and secure repeat business from clients.
    • Firms like Harris Williams are strictly sell-side M&A, which can further narrow the scope for relationship-building compared to firms with broader service offerings.
  3. Internal Competition:

    • The protective nature of senior MDs over their client relationships is a common refrain in MM firms as well. This can make it difficult for up-and-coming bankers to establish themselves unless they can carve out a niche or bring in new clients.
  4. Differences from EBs:

    • While MM firms share some challenges with EBs, they may offer slightly more flexibility in terms of internal mobility and opportunities to work across different industries or geographies. This can help junior MDs diversify their experience and potentially build relationships in less saturated areas.
  5. Compensation and Structure:

    • Compensation structures at MM firms are generally less lucrative than at BBs or EBs, which can impact the long-term incentives for junior MDs. However, the work-life balance and culture at some MM firms (e.g., Baird) are often seen as more favorable, which might offset some of these challenges.

In summary, making MD at an M&A-focused MM firm does come with hurdles similar to those at EBs, particularly around client relationships and limited service offerings. However, the path can vary significantly depending on the firm's culture, deal flow, and internal dynamics.

Sources: Some Observations from an MD, The Work Always Gets Done, How’s working in Hong Kong?, Questions about VP/D/MD levels at investment banks, Career Bankers: Coverage vs M&A

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

Deleniti omnis tenetur rem porro dolor aspernatur dolores. Laudantium autem ad vel quasi a laboriosam. Totam similique quis aut impedit maiores non sequi dolore. Repudiandae sed minima enim voluptates deleniti hic beatae. Velit nobis quaerat ducimus libero.

Career Advancement Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.3%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 03 98.9%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.3%

Professional Growth Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.3%

Total Avg Compensation

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (53) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (28) $184
  • Intern/Summer Associate (15) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”