Trending Content - Investment Banking Forum
| +235 | Who Killed Wall Street | 65 | 2d |
| +194 | Worlds Worst MDs Competition (2026 Edition) | 44 | 1h |
| +167 | As Lehman people reconvene at UBS, Barclays needs to hire (2023) | 23 | 6d |
| +130 | Only Indians cold emailing | 44 | 8h |
| +125 | Lindsay Clancy - Thoughts from A2 | 22 | 3d |
| +69 | UBS Healthcare | 34 | 19m |
| +50 | Shana tova - happy new year | 6 | 10h |
| +48 | NYC Wall Street Run Club | 13 | 7h |
| +45 | More diversity needed in the industry | 11 | 17h |
| +43 | EB (EVR/CVP/LAZ) vs MBB (Bain/BCG) | 22 | 48m |
Career Resources
Bump
It's dilutive and you can say so only if it's 100% financed with stocks
Well is it possible to be accretive if it’s a non all-stock deal?
Theoretically the foregone interest on cash or the interest in debt would have to be negative right?
Nihil exercitationem omnis modi amet ducimus laudantium. Consectetur ut iste non neque itaque. Possimus omnis quasi et ullam reprehenderit. Est tenetur dignissimos eius qui. Dolore debitis sint voluptatibus suscipit quidem architecto quis.
Ipsa omnis adipisci ipsam. Aut commodi perferendis enim odio ipsam autem nostrum.
Perferendis ratione et magnam aut magnam fugiat. In ipsam in repellendus saepe.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...