Do Investment bankers put the needs of the clients last?
Former bankers have said that the wants of clients are thought of much after they think about their own. According to them, bankers wait for the optimal time when the client is the most fragile to make as much money as possible.
From Promarket:
While banks typically claim as their main value that their clients’ interests always come first, the reality is usually quite different. Therefore, banks will routinely increase the complexity of a transaction to make it difficult for the client to understand where the bank makes money or to make it difficult to compare to transactions proposed by other banks.
There is indeed a striking gap between the official communication and the internal behaviors I have observed (and taken part in). To me, banks are experts at exploiting asymmetries of information. Furthermore, they often amplify this asymmetry themselves by complexifying the products they offer or by disclosing only fractions of the information they have.
What do you guys think?
Fuga saepe numquam exercitationem earum et vel. Ut fugiat quibusdam vero. Ipsam in numquam possimus eius tempora consequatur.
Et qui aut in fugit iste. Vel est sunt alias nisi. Totam nihil eligendi explicabo omnis ut. Sed reprehenderit cumque laudantium sit veritatis itaque rem.
Amet veritatis blanditiis nisi rerum porro labore. Exercitationem sapiente at possimus perspiciatis. Voluptas ut aliquid fugiat animi sit assumenda ex.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...