Do rankings even matter? Why do people care?

After combing various league tables, do they even matter? Obviously, if your goal is to go to MBB or a top-tier VC/PE/HF then sure, but outside of the top BBs they don't seem to matter much. Even still for top positions, it seems like a personal network matters much more and that the bank itself seems to be a minor factor.

The way I always viewed it was it was like the NBA/NFL/Any other sports league outside of soccer where what matters is you make the league as opposed to what team you play for, except of course if you are a top player and so want a certain market.

If this is true, why do people care? Why do so many people reneg to move up a few spots? I get a small no-name boutique to a BB but it seems people are just splitting hairs.

Region
11 Comments
 
Most Helpful

The way I always viewed it was it was like the NBA/NFL/Any other sports league outside of soccer where what matters is you make the league as opposed to what team you play for, except of course if you are a top player and so want a certain market.

Using this analogy there are few things you have to remember.  

1. Some players still care where they go and who they play for. Just like some prospects care who they work for.

2.  Most sports teams are going to be much more limited in size compared to the banking scene. Thus, just making it is more of an accomplishment. 

3. When you join the MLB/NFL/etc. you typically are not looking for an exit to a better opportunity.  I would go to argue that Banking in a sense is "like" the minor leagues for baseball. You hope one day that you can take another step forward in your career.  In banking some look to exit to PE/HF/etc. 

 

It's hard to use these analogies for industries, but it's pretty accurate for individual companies if everyone was on the same IB -> PE/HF career track (which is not the case). GS is still going to be the "NBA" in comparison to lower-MM/search fund PE. Comp depends on the fund-- MDs in BB/EB can make more than partners at small funds, but on average, the ceiling is higher on the buy-side.  

 

Inside the industry league tables don't mean shit. They are used by firms for marketing purposes in a very manipulated a specific way. A firm can claim to be #1 but is that based on number of deals or transaction value and is that worldwide or just the US market; beyond that it could even be more specific, for the US market for deals below $1bn if you're a MM player. Looking at YTD number of closed deals worldwide 3 of the Big4 (PwC/Deloitte/KPMG) are at the top of the table beating out firms like GS/JPM/MS, but if you look at it by value it's a different story.

 

They only matter if you want to break into select MFs that prefer to hire from GS/MS, outside of the finance industry, no one cares if you worked at Citi rather than CS or vice versa. Like the poster above said, every bank can tweak league tables to claim they are #1, and even if you base it on deal value, metrics can be skewed because there are banks who were only mandated to provide financing but still receive deal credit. The only bank that truly gives you an edge no matter where you go is GS

 

Qui quae quisquam quaerat iusto. Vel incidunt illum aut delectus ullam explicabo. Molestiae ut eius optio at sint eos. Maiores impedit consequatur et fuga.

Commodi omnis dolorem eaque perspiciatis officiis. Dolorem officiis doloribus nulla sunt sunt praesentium consequatur. Voluptatem doloremque deserunt nam. Cumque et voluptas quia labore.

Quia odio ad voluptatem atque iusto blanditiis. Vero nemo neque soluta ut harum molestiae pariatur eaque. Ab explicabo officia rerum nisi inventore rerum mollitia. Natus repellendus rerum et quibusdam voluptates.

Esse corporis voluptatem doloribus natus et earum iusto. Optio eos dolor voluptatum officiis. Sint quam amet mollitia quis ullam officia. Odio quis earum autem est. Ad in quisquam eveniet velit in nihil odio. Facilis est optio nulla rem ut sint quam. Harum consectetur consequatur dolor quaerat corporis.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.7%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (15) $434
  • Associates (46) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (79) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”