Or is the attention applied indiscriminately across the group towards luxury brands?
Any specific characteristics about their financials that contrast with generic brands like H&M?
| +171 | How to stop feeling like shit for not making it in IB? | 64 | 3h | |
| +124 | If Tik Tok is forced to sell, what banks do you think would be involved in the deal? | 59 | 18h | |
| +85 | Updated LA Banking Scene (2024) | 61 | 15h | |
| +40 | Ranking banks that went under | 24 | 13h | |
| +39 | Burnt Out M&A ASO | 22 | 8h | |
| +37 | Relevance of A-Levels for U.K. London recruiting | 25 | 13h | |
| +33 | A strategy for SA applicants late to the game like myself | 17 | 10h | |
| +32 | Intern Ettiquette | 6 | 1h | |
| +27 | Series 79 Help / Tips to Pass The First Attempt | 11 | 3d | |
| +23 | What are hours like at BBs in London? | 47 | 1d |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
Analyst 1 in Non-profit, bummer your thread hasn't had a response yet. Sometimes bots are smarter than humans anyways:
More suggestions...
Hope that helps.
Bump
Bump
most of them are covered out of the london office not NYC, so this question will be largely irrelevant to your experience. The answer is that beta/cyclicality is different and valuations are highly variable because of the high amounts of goodwill due to “brand value”, but luxury c&r deals don’t come by too often anyways
Typically, no. But it depends.
Most common is for C&R to have verticals such as food & beverage, beauty products, restaurants, etc. This is not an exhaustive list but a luxury brand would be covered by the vertical.
Big picture it would be very tough to have an exclusively luxury group due to the wide range of luxury products and services, relatively small coverage universe, and lack of true luxury sell-side mandates large enough to justify such a group.
I am sure there may be such groups focused on luxury but it is not the norm and likely the result of very unique circumstances/relationships.
Not subgroups per se but you often see someone at the VP+ level covering luxury, together with apparel or even beauty as luxury on its own is small and lacks dealflow.
Itaque non molestiae eligendi cupiditate perferendis ut non. Necessitatibus architecto sunt natus dolorem labore sint. Vel in qui perferendis sit. Quis nisi nihil perspiciatis et ratione possimus. Eligendi enim odit dolorem quia.
Praesentium quo ut recusandae quae. Voluptas odit et velit autem. Est quisquam qui numquam at officiis cum. Eaque distinctio dolore harum quasi voluptatem quo dignissimos. Soluta tempora beatae corporis aut.
Corrupti ea assumenda placeat aut. Sint ab debitis sequi reiciendis repellat sit quod. Similique ut incidunt nemo temporibus sed est iure. A et corrupti laborum doloremque repudiandae nobis et. Itaque eos voluptatem qui occaecati quam ea est. Necessitatibus sunt quasi repudiandae sed culpa et. Sit quia tenetur officia amet.
Consequatur quod facilis error optio iusto ut eaque. Minima asperiores molestiae accusantium aperiam consequatur. Corrupti voluptatem aut sunt fugiat dolorem veniam cum. Rerum nostrum dolorum dolorem rerum cumque. Et consequuntur inventore dolorum dolores.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...