EBITA
When would you look at EBITA vs. EBITDA or EBIT?
Also, what would be the difference in EBIT and EBITDA - Capex multiples? For a mature company, shouldn't they be approximately the same?
When would you look at EBITA vs. EBITDA or EBIT?
Also, what would be the difference in EBIT and EBITDA - Capex multiples? For a mature company, shouldn't they be approximately the same?
| +94 | Do people still want to go PE? | 28 | 16h |
| +91 | UBS Layoffs (October 2026) | 20 | 7m |
| +60 | Bloomberg - New UBS Investment Bankers See Smaller Pay Gain on Promotion | 12 | 2d |
| +46 | Think I'm fucking up my analyst years | 16 | 3d |
| +30 | Lazard hirevue | 10 | 17h |
| +30 | What Differentiates the Best Analysts as AI Improves? | 7 | 14h |
| +27 | Big 4 M&A vs. Lincoln Portfolio Valuations | 6 | 4d |
| +26 | Ambitious CC Student trying to break into IB | 13 | 2d |
| +22 | Not doing well mentally, how are others doing? | 7 | 4d |
| +19 | AI is incredible, how can analysts have an edge? | 27 | 56m |
Career Resources
EBITA views D as a real cost to business, if your depreciating and asset on your books, chances are its also actually wearing down. And yes, for a mature company you could assume that Depreciation is equal to CapEX so they'd be the same.
There seems to be a ridiculous number of new threads recently about EBITDA / EBITA / EBIT / EBITDA - Capex... A search bar exists on this site.
OP, regarding your 1st question. EBITA is usually meant to be ' EBIT + amortisation of acquired intangibles', i.e. intangibles that are recognised and written-up through acquisitions - so, it doesn't include for instance, amortisation of software that has been purchased. It is effectively a 'clean' version of EBIT. In terms of explanation - imagine 2 identical companies, one gets acquired, and through purchase price allocation, gets a bunch of intangibles recognised (e.g. customer relationships). The acquired company will start having an additional amortisation line item, which means its EBIT will be lower than the 1st company, even though they are operationally identical. Thus, you add back the amortisation to normalise the two companies, so EBITA will be the same.
Yes, for a mature company, you would expect EBIT and EBITDA-capex to be the same. For a growing / declining company, this relationship may not hold - hence why people look at metrics like EBITDA and EBITDA-capex.
Just to add a few additional comments to the thewaterpiper's fairly thorough post.
I'd also be carefully, especially with European companies, that EBITA can be EBIT adjusted so they adjust out all sorts of other operating items such as restructuring, pension curtailment gains and M&A adviser fees on acquisitions. This is fine when it is a one-off case but companies can repeatedly exclude restructuring costs from the metric that they are paid on.
At the end of the day, amortisation of acquired intangible is an accounting metric which has no impact on cash bar the taxes and I tend to ignore it in my assessment of underlying earnings/valuation by looking at the FCF.
Quia libero sed mollitia cumque. Aut porro a reiciendis et dolores.
Natus consequatur quis similique quia ad rerum. Similique deserunt rerum repellat culpa error exercitationem. Iure perspiciatis illum aut repudiandae dignissimos.
Molestiae nihil enim nisi qui quibusdam in. Est quae magni eum est veritatis recusandae aspernatur. Est itaque aliquam et quia.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...