Evercore 2023 on cycle placement
Saw other threads that said how other firms did in on cycle. How did Evercore analysts specifically do? Was it in line with last years class?
Trending Content - Investment Banking Forum
| +261 | Why UBS Is the Worst Place to Start Your IB Career | 40 | 1d |
| +216 | UBS 2nd Year Analyst Q&A (2026) | 41 | 6h |
| +95 | What's your craziest "hardo" story? | 16 | 15h |
| +62 | Indiana University Fraternity Pipelines | 36 | 2d |
| +52 | Rogo AI | 22 | 9h |
| +49 | Elite Boutique interview questions | 17 | 1d |
| +48 | Suspended for a Year | 21 | 1h |
| +47 | Wolf of Wall Street vs. Reality: Anyone else feel scammed by the movies? | 18 | 8h |
| +30 | Rate my non-target resume | 15 | 10h |
| +24 | RX Firm Lateral Advice | 15 | 14h |
Career Resources
Bump
Bump
Anyone excited to slackline??
lol
Goddamn a man can’t even ask a question nowadays
ur a man? ya no chance in todays political environment. suh dude
Nah not if you post “Official May 12 prestige rankings”
fuck dude you’re getting flamed
lmao
Was pretty underwhelming. All the good analysts recruit FT for pe and the rest are diversity / only got in through connections, and wouldn’t have been technically capable enough to get in on their own merit.
did a lot of kids go MF PE for FT from SA '23?
I helped run recruiting for my UMM and was surprised at the lack of competent EVR analysts the HH put in front of us. Friend at an MF said similar stuff - class size has gotten so large it’s meaningfully more difficult to screen from the bank and thus diluted the exits
Apollo and Centerbridge per another thread
that’s RX
Also only 1 at each
Ngl this bums me out as a white dude who will be with EVR next summer - hopefully this dud class isn’t a new standard. Was optimizing for PE exits
I’m curious what banks placed better as a whole this past cycle?
Lazard, Moelis, and PJT, especially considering that their analyst sizes are much smaller than Evercore in 2023.
Lazard had multiple Apollo, KKR and a TPG Growth
Mid af
Source?
nice to see the repercussions of aggressive diversity recruiting in effect
What the fuck is wrong with you? Do you truly believe that poor placement is a result solely because of minorities? Or rather the logical route that the combination of accelerated interviews with an objectively underprepared interviewee base and higher analyst headcount diminishes a banking group’s % of on-cycle placement.
Yes, I believe it is, in large part, due to recruiting efforts that are not purely meritocratic. “underprepared interviewee base” doesn’t hold up cuz kids from other EBs placed well. expansion of class size holds up until you consider shittier placement than prior classes (both per capita and in aggregate).
Do I think that giving people advantages for immutable characteristics in a zero-sum environment dilutes class quality when benchmarking against classes that emphasize merit? Of course. Would you have this same reaction to my sentiment if Duke basketball started taking more 5 foot 8 Asian guys and then sent way less guys to the league? Of course not.
Just my 2 cents as a SA in M&A. A lot of the kids here are hard working and sharp (when it comes to pure numbers & accounting), but are sheep from business schools who just did technicals since their finance club friends were all doing it and don't really understand businesses & investing. Especially the kids from UC Berkeley, UT Austin, USC, Ivey. The kids from Harvard/other Ivies/non finance major schools are better since they learned the technicals bc of genuine interest in investing. This may explain mediocre exits.
haha the semi-target biz school kids coming in hot!
Framing Ivey EVR kids as not understanding investing is crazy
I'm sure some do, but a good amount of these biz school kids are just going thru the motions of studying technicals, doing banking, etc bc all their finance major friends are doing it... they aren't motivated by an intrinsic interest in how businesses work
Kids from semi-targets and non-targets are grilled harder in technicals, have to network harder to get interviews, and work harder on the desk (not that I like them because some of them can be real hardos) than the kids coming from target schools that you mentioned. It's easier for the interviewers to justify taking a target kid which makes getting in from the other schools much harder. The competition pool is also bigger at the non-targets given the student population. Based on everything, I really don't get your rationale for why target school kids are superior. The same kid from a non-target getting into EVC NY would likely get into MF PE analyst role if they were at a target (where people with "genuine" interest in investing probably go)
Chill, that's just not true. A kid from Harvard/Yale/Princeton actually has a harder when it comes to boutique interviews since they don't have finance classes to learn the material, and those schools don't have the finance culture to study technicals (ie a lot has to be self taught and initiated). Compare that to a Ivey or USC where there is a finance major, 75% of your friends are recruiting (peer pressure), your undergrad finance club is telling you how interviews will go, etc. There's a reason you don't see many Harvard/MIT/Stanford/Ivy league kids at EVR... you think it's because they don't want the job?
Funny you mention Ivey in a list of schools that don't understand business and investing when the FT EVR analyst class from Ivey this year had on-cycle offers from Apollo and H&F.
May be helpful to know that MF PE analyst programs wiped out a good part of their top kids in the recent FT analyst class, 7-8 to SLP, 1 to Bain Cap, a few to WP
SLP analyst program is dead and Bain seems to have been a bloodbath this year. Curious to see what happens going forward.
Recusandae voluptas ut officia dolorum. Voluptatibus eius est natus consequuntur consectetur odio similique similique. Praesentium placeat ut repudiandae qui aperiam. Recusandae reprehenderit accusantium provident rem repellendus. Et sed ut ut non est. Quia dicta eius pariatur consequatur. Rerum inventore ut in quia quae eveniet quaerat.
Voluptates ad nulla qui vitae non debitis. Voluptatum consequatur omnis ullam ut animi aspernatur. Quam corporis sed hic officiis harum adipisci. Odit vero debitis quis corporis quam explicabo at sint.
Est aut nisi perferendis sequi esse quidem perspiciatis et. Suscipit quis molestiae nihil praesentium ex. Praesentium numquam ut dignissimos illum non. Repellendus qui nesciunt tenetur nemo facere et et. Iusto saepe officia quibusdam. Deleniti ab molestiae est sit ut et libero. Dolorem labore quo aut praesentium delectus voluptatem.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Itaque nam alias et beatae quo odio sed. Voluptatum aut quod quasi neque qui. Architecto qui laudantium quia possimus nostrum est delectus.
Nam distinctio ea cum voluptatibus. Quia a neque reiciendis perferendis ducimus. Rerum maiores et necessitatibus sunt. Exercitationem eveniet odit temporibus quo neque corrupti dolores laborum.