EV/UFCF & Equity Value/LFCF...Why?
When would you use a multiple i.e. EV/UFCF & Equity Value/LFCF rather versus your usually EV/EBITDA or Equity Value/Net Income? What does the multiple tell you?
Trending Content - Investment Banking Forum
| +433 | Is UBS really that bad? | 81 | 1h |
| +271 | Which Offer to Accept: UBS Analyst Role or Part Time Cashier at the Local Taco Bell | 34 | 43m |
| +264 | Investment Banking is Divine | 41 | 9h |
| +220 | Another $115bn Mega deal for these banks. Congrats! | 47 | 9h |
| +111 | Useless associates | 26 | 10h |
| +78 | AI is insane | 23 | 5h |
| +74 | Is Houston SA 28 recruiting already over? | 41 | 2h |
| +74 | Shame on you Evercore - SA 28 | 21 | 2h |
| +69 | Differences in Restructuring Teams? | 25 | 9h |
| +64 | Roku-Fox Deal - UBS Misses Out on yet another deals after years chasing this deal | 20 | 1h |
Career Resources
Well if you wanted to better represent the FCF items that EBITDA excludes (WC, capex, so forth), wouldn't that be a reason to use EV / UFCF? Different companies, even within the same industry, can have different capex needs so the default is to neutralize capex. If you have a reason for including stuff like capex, then it could make sense to use UFCF despite it being a less common metric than EV / EBITDA. Like if you're trying to make sense of how effectively cash is being converted.
So, for example a company is spending half as much on Capex but is growing at the same rate as comparable companies, then it would make sense to use EV/UFCF to incorporate how much the companies are converting revenue to cashflow while incorporating Capex spend, right? This would paint a better picture rather than EV/EBITDA, right?
Not exactly sure on your question as it relates to painting a picture of "growth."
To clarify, I am thinking about this in terms of how much you would pay for a business. Like if comps are suggesting 10x EV/EBITDA and you find out it has significantly more capex or WC using up cash, it may not make sense to pay 10x the EBITDA for the business.
Voluptas deleniti nam et quia doloremque labore et. Repudiandae beatae dignissimos maiores ratione. Omnis assumenda magni laboriosam autem praesentium hic ducimus quia. Et consequuntur voluptas nam quia ea omnis quo. Ea quasi omnis adipisci voluptatem ab magni autem.
Aliquam necessitatibus ipsam magnam quibusdam tenetur qui. Doloremque quos cum quod sunt exercitationem. Non vitae tempore quisquam suscipit temporibus laboriosam.
Exercitationem facilis quos sunt quam. Adipisci labore voluptates delectus quod incidunt inventore quisquam. Cupiditate soluta sed eos soluta quis. Dolorum quia suscipit earum et.
Occaecati dignissimos ea error autem. Occaecati iure iste quia velit omnis. Eos nisi nisi iste et qui soluta sunt. Pariatur totam vitae et et. Rerum culpa velit ipsa est. Nam dolorem sit accusamus.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...