EV/UFCF & Equity Value/LFCF...Why?
When would you use a multiple i.e. EV/UFCF & Equity Value/LFCF rather versus your usually EV/EBITDA or Equity Value/Net Income? What does the multiple tell you?
Trending Content - Investment Banking Forum
| +195 | Evercore > Goldman and I don’t think it’s particularly close anymore | 69 | 11m |
| +158 | Article: Why UBS's Asian M&A bankers are thriving and UBS's American M&A bankers are not | 18 | 2h |
| +109 | Think Twice before Recruiting for HOUSTON IB!! | 59 | 1m |
| +86 | UBS Offer Day | 34 | 1h |
| +73 | I hate Wells Fargo | 20 | 3h |
| +53 | No return offer - feeling like a failure is an understatement | 24 | 4h |
| +49 | How cooked am I as an incoming WF IB SA 2027? | 17 | 1d |
| +47 | WF Return offers | 30 | 6m |
| +40 | 2026 Investment Banking Return Offer Climate | 25 | 2d |
| +39 | Should I go back into a junior IBD role for comp? | 16 | 3d |
Career Resources
Well if you wanted to better represent the FCF items that EBITDA excludes (WC, capex, so forth), wouldn't that be a reason to use EV / UFCF? Different companies, even within the same industry, can have different capex needs so the default is to neutralize capex. If you have a reason for including stuff like capex, then it could make sense to use UFCF despite it being a less common metric than EV / EBITDA. Like if you're trying to make sense of how effectively cash is being converted.
So, for example a company is spending half as much on Capex but is growing at the same rate as comparable companies, then it would make sense to use EV/UFCF to incorporate how much the companies are converting revenue to cashflow while incorporating Capex spend, right? This would paint a better picture rather than EV/EBITDA, right?
Not exactly sure on your question as it relates to painting a picture of "growth."
To clarify, I am thinking about this in terms of how much you would pay for a business. Like if comps are suggesting 10x EV/EBITDA and you find out it has significantly more capex or WC using up cash, it may not make sense to pay 10x the EBITDA for the business.
Assumenda ipsa quam velit eum iste voluptate aut quod. Voluptatem sed nostrum perferendis ipsa voluptas. Aliquid veritatis accusamus debitis tempore quaerat necessitatibus sit. Et quod rerum ratione et eligendi. Dolor eos enim excepturi architecto molestiae. Quas delectus nemo ea.
Ducimus ducimus fugit qui. Accusantium quos qui optio dolorem dolores officiis. Nulla ex tenetur voluptatem aperiam et rerum.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...