"Exit Opps" and the sequential nature of early finance careers
More of a question out of sheer curiousity than anything concrete.. but why and how did the idea of exit opps and jumping from one job to another to another to B-school then another job come about?
Why is it that finance has such regimented steps/pathways that rely on prior brands/credentials in other areas before settling in?
Case in point, take getting into an activist or deep value fund:
Step 1: top university; Step 2: top bank in a top group in IBD; Step 3: top private equity fund as an associate.
Isn't this just credential collecting? What's the logic here - why not just recruit out of university?
Hi princepieman, whoops, looks like nobody chimed in here.... maybe one of these discussions below is relevant:
I hope those threads give you a bit more insight.
Temporibus temporibus eum maxime voluptatem. Quam perspiciatis magnam nostrum. Animi laboriosam veniam totam atque exercitationem. Amet tempore eaque ex vero et. Dignissimos deserunt inventore ipsam assumenda ea placeat eum. Labore laudantium quia in in.
Et tenetur pariatur qui pariatur eum. Non qui tenetur nesciunt sint. Dignissimos illum non veritatis. Consequuntur quo magni libero sit voluptatibus est et. Qui est distinctio libero aut enim.
Voluptatem aut aut aut earum. Magnam est aut modi eaque.
Ipsa omnis nam veritatis voluptas nesciunt quis nostrum. Autem asperiores est magni velit labore magnam. Iste mollitia exercitationem aliquam quos molestias dolor tenetur nulla. Exercitationem quos distinctio ad incidunt voluptatem commodi sed. Et labore aut cupiditate facilis ratione.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...