Exits for Houston IB Juniors in 2025?

I'm a freshman interested in energy, renewables, and infrastructure. For Houston IB, I'm curious how feasible it is for analysts from top groups like GS, MS, JPM, and Jefferies to recruit on-cycle into MF infra PE roles. Do most analysts recruit into O&G-focused funds in Texas, or is it common to exit to MF infra in NYC? Any insights into the % who end up doing non pure-energy infra?

Any help would be greatly appreciated! Also, would it be a significant edge to recruit from a NYC-based P&U team, or is the gap closeable?

4 Comments
 

For Houston IB juniors in 2025, here's what you need to know based on the most helpful WSO content:

  1. Exits to MF Infra PE Roles:

    • Analysts from top Houston groups like GS, MS, JPM, and Jefferies have a solid foundation for recruiting into MF infra PE roles. However, the majority of exits from Houston tend to be into O&G-focused funds or energy infrastructure funds, particularly those with a presence in Texas.
    • While it's feasible to recruit into MF infra PE roles in NYC, it is less common compared to energy-specific exits. Analysts with strong deal experience in energy infrastructure (e.g., midstream, downstream, or renewables) may have an edge for broader infra roles, but the transition to non-energy infra-focused funds is more challenging.
  2. Non-Energy Infra Exits:

    • A significant portion of deal activity in general infra funds still leans toward energy-related assets (O&G, power, renewables). This overlap means that while some analysts do transition to non-energy infra roles, the majority remain tied to energy-related investments.
    • For those aiming to break into non-energy infra, having exposure to broader infrastructure deals (e.g., transport, telecom, water) or a generalist M&A background can be advantageous.
  3. NYC P&U Teams vs. Houston Energy Groups:

    • Recruiting from a NYC-based P&U team could provide a slight edge for non-energy infra roles, as these teams often cover a broader range of infrastructure sectors beyond energy. However, the gap is not insurmountable.
    • Houston energy groups, especially at top firms like Evercore, Jefferies, and Barclays, are highly respected and offer strong exits to energy infra funds and even some generalist infra funds. Success in recruiting will depend more on your deal experience, networking, and ability to position yourself as a strong candidate for broader infra roles.
  4. Key Takeaways for Freshmen:

    • If you're interested in energy, renewables, and infrastructure, starting in a Houston IB group can provide excellent exposure to energy infrastructure deals, which are highly relevant for infra PE recruiting.
    • To maximize your chances of breaking into MF infra PE or non-energy infra roles, focus on gaining diverse deal experience, networking with professionals in your target funds, and considering lateral moves if necessary to broaden your exposure.

In summary, while most Houston IB analysts exit to energy-focused funds, transitioning to MF infra PE or non-energy infra roles is possible with the right experience and strategy.

Sources: https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forum/investment-banking/ib-pu-vs-infra-project-finance-teams-for-infra-pe-recruiting?customgpt=1, Did 2021 on-cycle recruit, joined a MF PE firm that I'm not that excited about..., https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forum/investment-banking/houstonenergy-exit-opps?customgpt=1, Houston EB or NYC MM, Personal Experience with Houston Energy IBD - Thoughts on Industry Outlook? (Long Post)

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

Thanks for your response! Would you say the juniors at these top Houston groups will get similar looks to NY analysts from P&U or energy transition-specific groups? And would it be better to work in a group that does M&A work in-house like GS Houston or at a NY-based P&U team, even if that bank has its own M&A team like MS? Curious how much experience vs geographic location matters

 

Est a explicabo et vitae unde et repudiandae. Cum tempore dolores ducimus assumenda eius. Impedit recusandae ea numquam sapiente.

Ut qui quidem aperiam esse beatae. Officiis laborum possimus corporis ut. Autem doloremque cum cupiditate veritatis. Harum ea excepturi alias aperiam. Ipsa eum voluptas vel sit vero.

Quam laborum amet alias debitis est. Consequatur debitis possimus nam temporibus voluptate. Quos deleniti sint asperiores odio laborum. Tenetur quia autem nesciunt et. Quam qui et tempore non illum minima. Expedita molestiae qui minima laborum earum eum.

Est fugiat facilis qui veritatis debitis ullam iusto non. Deleniti dolores culpa perferendis quia harum odio. Veritatis commodi nam reiciendis at.

Career Advancement Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.3%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 03 98.9%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.3%

Professional Growth Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.3%

Total Avg Compensation

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (51) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (26) $182
  • Intern/Summer Associate (15) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”