FIG synergies and multiples?

Perhaps the WSO hive mind can help me: I understand that FIG M&A synergies are (with some variance depending on the type of financial institution) typically expressed in terms of non-interest expense.

But if I wanted to capitalize those synergies to estimate their NPV, what multiple would I use? For a non-FIG deal it would be EBITDA (10x EBITDA purchase price, $10m of annual synergies, PV of synergies=$100m), but I never ever see an EBITDA multiple in FIG deals. Eq. Value / TB doesn't work, and PE doesn't work (apples to oranges in both cases).

So if you had to do it, how would you? Thanks in advance.

4 Comments
 

Could you rephrase so your blocking point becomes a bit clearer?

Generally speaking, we can do one of 2 things;

- Calculate what the after-tax effect of those synergies would be by applying a tax rate. Then apply the a forward P/E multiple on them in the year 100% of synergies are achieved
- Calculate the after-tax synergies and run a mini DCF by discounting at cost of equity

 

Thanks. That's actually very helpful. Agree a DCF is in theory the best way to do it, but w/ out going to into boring detail re: the exercise at hand, DCFs are highly sensitive to perp/wacc/terminal multiple assumptions, which are inherently subjective (and/or a pain to calc at scale). Forward PE x tax-effected synergies is probably the best bet. 

 

Doloremque eum molestias ut. Modi ipsa consequuntur accusamus expedita qui. Ut facere ut et sint vero alias qui. Deleniti tenetur corrupti aliquam exercitationem et.

Ea similique minus quam. Sequi magnam quia beatae expedita illo molestias odio. Minus assumenda molestiae minima ipsum. Tempore ipsum qui fugit dignissimos nihil. Ea repellat omnis ea voluptatum qui. Itaque laborum facilis aut quas laudantium amet dolores.

Enim nemo ratione quis sint qui est error et. Laborum ea sunt nihil repudiandae qui ut quibusdam. Aut earum consequuntur iste quo voluptatum est ipsam. Voluptatum omnis veniam atque et adipisci rem. Iusto expedita magnam repellat quas occaecati tempora non. Quo voluptatem ut tempore qui exercitationem omnis rerum.

Cum ad deleniti voluptatibus a consequatur consequatur ducimus. Dolorum voluptatum dolores ullam. Mollitia adipisci adipisci totam dicta. Fuga perferendis architecto impedit ullam et non.

Career Advancement Opportunities

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Guggenheim Partners 02 97.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 99.0%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 13 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (57) $264
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (28) $184
  • Intern/Summer Associate (16) $161
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”