Finance and business bachelors or Economics with finance bachelors (High semi-target) UK

I wanted to get a quick consensus before I decide which major to pursue.  (Might fucking break me or make me considering I am going to study at a semi-target) I aim to break into high finance, and I'm concerned about the impact of my major choices on my career. I'm adamant about choosing between them. University: University of Edinburgh Option 1: Finance and Business (50% : 50%) MA (Honours) Business School, accredited by the Business School  Option 2: Economics with Finance (75% : 25%) MA (Honours) Economics School, accredited by the Business School (Weird, I know)  Option 1 pros/cons: Finance with business: Benefits: More available credits can be spent on finance classes, such as M&A, financial markets, Futures and options, fixed income analysis, investments and securities markets, global macro investing, equity finance, and additional accounting classes (fast-track to take these classes in years 1 and 2).Business school presitegeMore Free time Cons: 50% of classes are spent on useless business classes that are 9 times out of 10 completely unanalytical.  And the course itself as a whole is easier.Furthermore, after reviewing graduate surveys, it is found that fewer graduates become analysts, and less satisfaction is reported among the student body.  Most graduates end up in consulting or as analysts (to a lesser extent) right after graduation. Option 2 pros/cons: Economics with Finance: Benefits:More rigorous and analytical courses often require several mandatory challenging economics classes, such as financial econometrics, game theory, advanced mathematical economics, and statistical methods for economics, among others (Check the link above for more information).It has the same accreditation as the business major above, but it falls under the economics school, which is easier to get into but with higher qualifications needed.I will actually learn some interesting theories and apply relevant analytical concepts. Cons: Less time is spent on financial classes, and most financial courses are available in year 3 (with limited credits to spend on) and year 4 (where they won't be helpful because my summer internship would have passed).It's very challenging, so achieving good grades will be hard, but it's doable.There is no business school prestige, as it's under the economics school; however, it's the only economics major accredited by the business school. Conclusion: Finance with business is less analytical and less demanding, but it gives me more freedom for external work, such as extracurricular activities.  It lacks the analytical rigour and toughness that IB recruiters seek, and it fails to teach critical economic principles.  And the business classes are terrible.  And from what I have seen, it has lower chances of breaking into top banks. Economics with finance is very analytically demanding and enriching; it has the same accreditation but lacks business school prestige, and not enough time is spent teaching actual finance.  The window of opportunity to take those classes falls in the last years of the major, making it annoying.  It looks better on paper but is harder to execute. Which degree is better for high finance? Thank you.  Please keep the roasting to a minimum, and note that these are the only two viable finance majors at the University of Edinburgh, besides Finance and Accounting, which have their own issues.