Financial Statement Weird!

Okay! So I'm taking a look at some financial statements to sort of get a better understanding of accounting. From what I know, the changes in operating assets and liabilities on the balance sheet SHOULD reflect on the cash flow statement.

For example, if Accounts receivable 2009 is 10 and 2010 is 20, then there is a $10 change.

Then in the cash flow statement, we should see minus 10 when reconciling income to net cash for 2010.

but in these statements, none of these are reflected. All the changes are not reflected with the exception of like 2 line items. Am i missing something here?

5 Comments
 
Best Response

Ok let's go back to the fundamentals. The premise behind AR affecting cash flows assumes that all changes in AR would affect either an effective collection or payment of cash. This inherently assumes that increasing AR cannot be a result of both collections / payments of cash.

Now think about the different things that affect AR. You've probably thought of recording revenue and the resulting in crease in AR, which would decrease cash flow since the customers have not paid yet. Now think a bit deeper; if a customer takes $10,000 of goods, will he always pay you the full $10,000? What happens, accounting-wise, if he doesn't?

Now go back to our original premise. Would the transaction in the above paragraph affect the direction your AR is moving vs. the cash flow receipt/payment?

Spoiler below: So when a customer pays $9,000 instead of the full $10,000, you have to write-off your AR by $1,000 (we'll just look at the doubtful accounts portion instead of the bad debt expense portion for now). This means your AR is going down by $1,000. But by our premise in paragraph 1, AR going now is a good thing normally, right? Because it'd mean customers have paid the company, so the AR goes down by the payment amount. However, as you can see above, this is not always the case. If AR decreases, cash doesn't necessarily always increase by the same amount.

Good luck!

 
quattroblancOk let's go back to the fundamentals. The premise behind AR affecting cash flows assumes that all changes in AR would affect either an effective collection or payment of cash. This inherently assumes that increasing AR cannot be a result of both collections / payments of cash.

Now think about the different things that affect AR. You've probably thought of recording revenue and the resulting in crease in AR, which would decrease cash flow since the customers have not paid yet. Now think a bit deeper; if a customer takes $10,000 of goods, will he always pay you the full $10,000? What happens, accounting-wise, if he doesn't?

Now go back to our original premise. Would the transaction in the above paragraph affect the direction your AR is moving vs. the cash flow receipt/payment?

Spoiler below: So when a customer pays $9,000 instead of the full $10,000, you have to write-off your AR by $1,000 (we'll just look at the doubtful accounts portion instead of the bad debt expense portion for now). This means your AR is going down by $1,000. But by our premise in paragraph 1, AR going now is a good thing normally, right? Because it'd mean customers have paid the company, so the AR goes down by the payment amount. However, as you can see above, this is not always the case. If AR decreases, cash doesn't necessarily always increase by the same amount.

Good luck!

That makes so much sense. Thanks!!!

 

Sunt exercitationem assumenda laudantium ipsam esse dignissimos. Distinctio sequi libero officia occaecati neque aliquid vitae. Laboriosam explicabo consectetur eum.

Sint et sed provident consequatur delectus. Vitae voluptatem rem aut omnis sunt eius autem.

 

Corrupti ut voluptatem omnis quis omnis voluptatem. Rerum assumenda adipisci cumque dolores accusantium. Expedita aut illum molestiae similique. Explicabo distinctio reiciendis sed voluptate. Consequatur et fugiat ut suscipit autem aliquam doloribus. In sed alias aut consectetur repudiandae doloremque.

Cupiditate ut eos iste debitis modi quo dolorum. Asperiores porro a itaque a. Fugiat dolore voluptatem voluptatem a. Non voluptatibus quis nesciunt aperiam animi rem cupiditate. Dolor quidem aut deleniti magni est repudiandae voluptates ut. Natus numquam animi aliquid voluptas doloremque occaecati.

Delectus quam totam et esse itaque modi. Illo sed voluptates accusamus quia iusto fuga. Mollitia autem a tenetur quia error doloribus voluptates. Ut eaque aut atque voluptas harum quaerat quis.

Career Advancement Opportunities

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Guggenheim Partners 02 97.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 99.0%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 13 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (57) $264
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (29) $183
  • Intern/Summer Associate (16) $161
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”