Financial Statement Weird!

Okay! So I'm taking a look at some financial statements to sort of get a better understanding of accounting. From what I know, the changes in operating assets and liabilities on the balance sheet SHOULD reflect on the cash flow statement.

For example, if Accounts receivable 2009 is 10 and 2010 is 20, then there is a $10 change.

Then in the cash flow statement, we should see minus 10 when reconciling income to net cash for 2010.

but in these statements, none of these are reflected. All the changes are not reflected with the exception of like 2 line items. Am i missing something here?

 
Best Response

Ok let's go back to the fundamentals. The premise behind AR affecting cash flows assumes that all changes in AR would affect either an effective collection or payment of cash. This inherently assumes that increasing AR cannot be a result of both collections / payments of cash.

Now think about the different things that affect AR. You've probably thought of recording revenue and the resulting in crease in AR, which would decrease cash flow since the customers have not paid yet. Now think a bit deeper; if a customer takes $10,000 of goods, will he always pay you the full $10,000? What happens, accounting-wise, if he doesn't?

Now go back to our original premise. Would the transaction in the above paragraph affect the direction your AR is moving vs. the cash flow receipt/payment?

Spoiler below: So when a customer pays $9,000 instead of the full $10,000, you have to write-off your AR by $1,000 (we'll just look at the doubtful accounts portion instead of the bad debt expense portion for now). This means your AR is going down by $1,000. But by our premise in paragraph 1, AR going now is a good thing normally, right? Because it'd mean customers have paid the company, so the AR goes down by the payment amount. However, as you can see above, this is not always the case. If AR decreases, cash doesn't necessarily always increase by the same amount.

Good luck!

 
quattroblanc:
Ok let's go back to the fundamentals. The premise behind AR affecting cash flows assumes that all changes in AR would affect either an effective collection or payment of cash. This inherently assumes that increasing AR cannot be a result of both collections / payments of cash.

Now think about the different things that affect AR. You've probably thought of recording revenue and the resulting in crease in AR, which would decrease cash flow since the customers have not paid yet. Now think a bit deeper; if a customer takes $10,000 of goods, will he always pay you the full $10,000? What happens, accounting-wise, if he doesn't?

Now go back to our original premise. Would the transaction in the above paragraph affect the direction your AR is moving vs. the cash flow receipt/payment?

Spoiler below: So when a customer pays $9,000 instead of the full $10,000, you have to write-off your AR by $1,000 (we'll just look at the doubtful accounts portion instead of the bad debt expense portion for now). This means your AR is going down by $1,000. But by our premise in paragraph 1, AR going now is a good thing normally, right? Because it'd mean customers have paid the company, so the AR goes down by the payment amount. However, as you can see above, this is not always the case. If AR decreases, cash doesn't necessarily always increase by the same amount.

Good luck!

That makes so much sense. Thanks!!!

 

Distinctio et provident accusamus sed aut. Voluptatibus voluptas repellat illo doloremque a commodi ipsum. Possimus voluptatem magni consequatur placeat ea unde natus. Occaecati dignissimos facere rem aut quia illum assumenda.

Sed ex laudantium aut ut officia. Perspiciatis libero est expedita quam laudantium.

Corporis enim qui nisi atque. Beatae veritatis unde culpa veritatis corrupti et non. Aut non aut sed. Fugit sint hic et repellat sint et dicta.

 

Nobis quasi nisi suscipit. Quia iure rerum minima possimus quaerat sed reiciendis maiores. Sed rerum necessitatibus dolorem et corrupti. Modi cum dolore laborum.

Et architecto asperiores sed voluptas non quia ducimus quia. Debitis assumenda iusto dolores dignissimos laudantium perspiciatis. Deleniti nam saepe atque qui.

Voluptas ipsa sapiente reiciendis voluptas quaerat itaque ipsa. Non et et magnam ratione fugit autem hic.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 04 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (20) $385
  • Associates (88) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (67) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”