Financial Statement Weird!

Okay! So I'm taking a look at some financial statements to sort of get a better understanding of accounting. From what I know, the changes in operating assets and liabilities on the balance sheet SHOULD reflect on the cash flow statement.

For example, if Accounts receivable 2009 is 10 and 2010 is 20, then there is a $10 change.

Then in the cash flow statement, we should see minus 10 when reconciling income to net cash for 2010.

but in these statements, none of these are reflected. All the changes are not reflected with the exception of like 2 line items. Am i missing something here?

5 Comments
 
Best Response

Ok let's go back to the fundamentals. The premise behind AR affecting cash flows assumes that all changes in AR would affect either an effective collection or payment of cash. This inherently assumes that increasing AR cannot be a result of both collections / payments of cash.

Now think about the different things that affect AR. You've probably thought of recording revenue and the resulting in crease in AR, which would decrease cash flow since the customers have not paid yet. Now think a bit deeper; if a customer takes $10,000 of goods, will he always pay you the full $10,000? What happens, accounting-wise, if he doesn't?

Now go back to our original premise. Would the transaction in the above paragraph affect the direction your AR is moving vs. the cash flow receipt/payment?

Spoiler below: So when a customer pays $9,000 instead of the full $10,000, you have to write-off your AR by $1,000 (we'll just look at the doubtful accounts portion instead of the bad debt expense portion for now). This means your AR is going down by $1,000. But by our premise in paragraph 1, AR going now is a good thing normally, right? Because it'd mean customers have paid the company, so the AR goes down by the payment amount. However, as you can see above, this is not always the case. If AR decreases, cash doesn't necessarily always increase by the same amount.

Good luck!

 
quattroblancOk let's go back to the fundamentals. The premise behind AR affecting cash flows assumes that all changes in AR would affect either an effective collection or payment of cash. This inherently assumes that increasing AR cannot be a result of both collections / payments of cash.

Now think about the different things that affect AR. You've probably thought of recording revenue and the resulting in crease in AR, which would decrease cash flow since the customers have not paid yet. Now think a bit deeper; if a customer takes $10,000 of goods, will he always pay you the full $10,000? What happens, accounting-wise, if he doesn't?

Now go back to our original premise. Would the transaction in the above paragraph affect the direction your AR is moving vs. the cash flow receipt/payment?

Spoiler below: So when a customer pays $9,000 instead of the full $10,000, you have to write-off your AR by $1,000 (we'll just look at the doubtful accounts portion instead of the bad debt expense portion for now). This means your AR is going down by $1,000. But by our premise in paragraph 1, AR going now is a good thing normally, right? Because it'd mean customers have paid the company, so the AR goes down by the payment amount. However, as you can see above, this is not always the case. If AR decreases, cash doesn't necessarily always increase by the same amount.

Good luck!

That makes so much sense. Thanks!!!

 

Sequi adipisci omnis dolores dolore veritatis eum. Laudantium dolor molestias quisquam accusamus suscipit maiores. Et tempora officia dolorum quia non.

Ea velit nobis qui. Sed est vel ut perspiciatis. Praesentium est reprehenderit autem error. Quas corrupti quisquam consequuntur aut. Quis at et quae. Cumque culpa fugit explicabo illo rerum eos est.

Ex consequatur qui sint dolores consequatur ut. Cumque mollitia nobis dignissimos autem nihil.

Incidunt facere iure nostrum. Ex id voluptatibus voluptatibus ut modi ad. Possimus esse neque velit facilis. Sit eius officiis rerum doloremque ea iure aut.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (67) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”