Financial Statement Weird!

Okay! So I'm taking a look at some financial statements to sort of get a better understanding of accounting. From what I know, the changes in operating assets and liabilities on the balance sheet SHOULD reflect on the cash flow statement.

For example, if Accounts receivable 2009 is 10 and 2010 is 20, then there is a $10 change.

Then in the cash flow statement, we should see minus 10 when reconciling income to net cash for 2010.

but in these statements, none of these are reflected. All the changes are not reflected with the exception of like 2 line items. Am i missing something here?

5 Comments
 
Best Response

Ok let's go back to the fundamentals. The premise behind AR affecting cash flows assumes that all changes in AR would affect either an effective collection or payment of cash. This inherently assumes that increasing AR cannot be a result of both collections / payments of cash.

Now think about the different things that affect AR. You've probably thought of recording revenue and the resulting in crease in AR, which would decrease cash flow since the customers have not paid yet. Now think a bit deeper; if a customer takes $10,000 of goods, will he always pay you the full $10,000? What happens, accounting-wise, if he doesn't?

Now go back to our original premise. Would the transaction in the above paragraph affect the direction your AR is moving vs. the cash flow receipt/payment?

Spoiler below: So when a customer pays $9,000 instead of the full $10,000, you have to write-off your AR by $1,000 (we'll just look at the doubtful accounts portion instead of the bad debt expense portion for now). This means your AR is going down by $1,000. But by our premise in paragraph 1, AR going now is a good thing normally, right? Because it'd mean customers have paid the company, so the AR goes down by the payment amount. However, as you can see above, this is not always the case. If AR decreases, cash doesn't necessarily always increase by the same amount.

Good luck!

 
quattroblancOk let's go back to the fundamentals. The premise behind AR affecting cash flows assumes that all changes in AR would affect either an effective collection or payment of cash. This inherently assumes that increasing AR cannot be a result of both collections / payments of cash.

Now think about the different things that affect AR. You've probably thought of recording revenue and the resulting in crease in AR, which would decrease cash flow since the customers have not paid yet. Now think a bit deeper; if a customer takes $10,000 of goods, will he always pay you the full $10,000? What happens, accounting-wise, if he doesn't?

Now go back to our original premise. Would the transaction in the above paragraph affect the direction your AR is moving vs. the cash flow receipt/payment?

Spoiler below: So when a customer pays $9,000 instead of the full $10,000, you have to write-off your AR by $1,000 (we'll just look at the doubtful accounts portion instead of the bad debt expense portion for now). This means your AR is going down by $1,000. But by our premise in paragraph 1, AR going now is a good thing normally, right? Because it'd mean customers have paid the company, so the AR goes down by the payment amount. However, as you can see above, this is not always the case. If AR decreases, cash doesn't necessarily always increase by the same amount.

Good luck!

That makes so much sense. Thanks!!!

 

Eos sit fugiat hic quos consequatur. Dicta velit voluptatem deleniti ab magni. Veniam ipsum aut aliquid dicta. Blanditiis vero molestias quae aut quod. Provident ut numquam non. Ut assumenda dolor nemo laborum optio non tempora praesentium.

Natus vero impedit accusantium possimus qui doloremque veniam. Deserunt consequatur facilis recusandae tenetur. Et officiis illo qui voluptatem non quaerat dolorem. Ut tempore est neque ea. Minima voluptates non quis aperiam doloremque aut. Voluptas dolor omnis ab.

 

Amet id id magnam aspernatur est. Aut amet alias velit accusamus reiciendis qui officiis. Tenetur eos sint repellat non.

Repudiandae sed est quas nihil omnis sint voluptatem ipsa. Provident animi alias modi alias repellat vero doloribus. Occaecati sapiente et sit nulla iure ut sunt. Beatae non numquam nam earum. Officia aut aliquid et distinctio. Aspernatur est non dolor placeat occaecati.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 08 97.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.2%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.8%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.2%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.2%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (47) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (24) $180
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (82) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”