GS Layoffs
WSJ reporting that Goldman Sachs is planning another round of layoffs.
Quite surprising given good results today (particularly M&A advisory revenues), which reflect an “improved market environment” per DJ Sol.
WSJ reporting that Goldman Sachs is planning another round of layoffs.
Quite surprising given good results today (particularly M&A advisory revenues), which reflect an “improved market environment” per DJ Sol.
| +165 | Americas M&A League Table Q2 Updated | 70 | 6h |
| +132 | New Article: Dramatic Slide as UBS #22 (US) & New Leadership Desperately Needed | 25 | 1d |
| +90 | Restructuring: Anti-climactic Experience | 17 | 1h |
| +71 | A COMPLETE GUIDE TO SUMMER INTERNSHIP RECRUITING | 12 | 20h |
| +58 | IB Net Worth / Savings Check | 21 | 1h |
| +51 | Boutique firm wants access to my LinkedIn? | 41 | 1h |
| +37 | Investment Banking is Hard | 16 | 3h |
| +33 | Investment Banking in Mexico | 9 | 2d |
| +28 | PWP vs BofA | 21 | 14h |
| +21 | Excel macros for QOL formatting | 0 | 6d |
Career Resources
Goldman is now planning another round of layoffs, according to people familiar with the matter.
The Wall Street giant will cut jobs with a focus on lower performers, according to people familiar with the matter. Goldman employees on Tuesday received a memo signed by the firm’s top brass including Solomon that the firm “will constrain head count growth through the end of the year” and that it will conduct “a limited reduction in roles across the firm.”
Update:
WSJ says the cuts would hit 3%–5% of staff—~1,400–2,300 roles based on Goldman’s ~46,000 headcount—and focus on vice presidents as part of its annual performance review cycle, reviving a practice scaled back during the dealmaking slump.
This is an up or out business, so the outs need to be pushed if they don’t happen naturally
Employers are remaining pretty cautious because no one knows what will happen in the next couple months. We're in both a highly speculative and highly propped up economy. American consumers are struggling heavily, and consumer debt delinquency just hit its highest point since 2020. Americans are feeling the squeeze, and the shutdown is only making things worse.
For some time, we've been in a "low hire, low fire" economy. Despite headline layoffs, as a whole this labor market has remained very steady for those in employment. That's reflected in the unemployment numbers. But we're also in a low hiring state, and this is reflected in the time it takes to get a job being very very high.
So, right now we're stuck. And right now, there are a lot of potential catalysts that could lead this economy to being a low hire, lots of fire economy-aka a recession. What are those? Well, here are some I can list off the top of my head
Those are just a few, I'm sure there are more. It's likely that there will be some sort of negative reverberation because of at least one of these things, and right now we don't exactly have the best leadership to right the ship if something bad does happen. So, companies are rushing to safety. They're shoring up their balance sheets, and getting ready for if something really bad happens. And when you put the layoffs in the broader context of the US economy, they make perfect sense for GS.
Prob AI related unfortunately. Need less people for same work output.
This is dirty by senior executives and they are becoming habitual offenders for which markets need to penalize them. Restructuring costs every quarter are not ok.
Here is their game plan. Make employees toil hard throughout the year and deliver strong results for 3 quarters. Then right before year end force rank people and execute layoffs to artificially pump revenue (or earnings) per headcount. Here is the dilemma, none of the DEI Beckies will get laid off as managers will be too afraid to dent their DEI KPIs which feed into their comp. Political decisions will be made and male employees will bear the brunt. Had there been no layoffs these Beckies would be bottom bucket and nobody would care.
I posted this before but copying because its relevant:
Over the years I've literally seen so many college kids on this forum say they'd rather hire a hot white girl than some white/Asian nerd when they have to sit around them 20 hours a day. Then these same people a few years later go on to bitch about when their seniors lay them off instead of the hot white girl as if they (or some older version of them) aren't the reason for these DEI Beckies being there.
Bankers lack self awareness.
HR and Senior bankers (MD+) should show some courage and disclose the gender and racial breakdown of layoffs. I can tell it is overwhelmingly men, and leaning towards men of color. Often these kind of layoffs are used to settle political vendettas in offices.
White bosses fire their non-white workers. History repeats itself
The one thing the place does is regularly surprise / amaze me regarding how little it cares about its people. Close friends who worked at JPM and some of the leading boutiques and while similar issues with hours and general banking nonsense, it seems to me those organizations are much more invested in your development and care about your existence. It actually would be ok with me if GS was more honest and said what everyone knows about its culture, it's the constant bullsh!t about how people are their most important asset and the firm cares about mentorship etc. that bothers me, so blatantly dishonest. Place reminds me of the Sopranos: "sh*t runs downhill, money goes up, and it's that simple."
No worries. Bank of America will scoop up all the underperformers as always and pay them two year guarantees while paying their existing top performers rat shit.
GS —> BofA coverage —> BofA EGRC
What is "EGRC"?
Is this part of a standard underperformance cull, or something out of the ordinary?
If the former, this is not surprising. IB is a competitive field and a up or out model. There is very little natural churn in the job market right now, so you need to actively cull in order to keep headcount at an appropriate level (assuming you recruit new analysts & associates every year). Plus in my experience, the bottom 5% or so of a class is not capable of doing the job anyways.
Otherwise you end up like BofA, paying everyone peanuts due to an refusal to cull and pushing high performers out.
The latter. The standard annual performance layoffs already happened. So this is further cost cutting, which will likely target the bottom performers out of those survivors from the prior round.
Earlier in the year, GS said they will do a further round but then shelved the plans given activity picked up. But now they are re-committing to them, despite strong results and an improved market. Rare for M&A to be strong when corporates & PE are concerned at the level of uncertainty (historically tariffs, interest rates etc).
Bump
Doesn’t sound like this is front office focused from the announcement unless I’m missing something. BB in general appear to be net hiring vs net firing, 2026 pipelines are strong.
Ut qui rerum debitis explicabo in. Architecto tempore et rerum est corrupti. Pariatur labore mollitia perferendis. Doloribus maxime voluptatibus quae labore. Adipisci commodi sint aperiam unde. Dolor nesciunt ea eos consequatur illo.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...