imagine qatalyst dominates m&a space, but is gs sf and ms menlo comparable for m&a? any trends? know grimes has left to government in menlo so imagine that's a big hit to the office, so wondering how the office compares. really seem like those three are the biggest players in tech m&a in the bay.
| +350 | Evercore Intern Seizure | 54 | 1h |
| +66 | JPM M&A is Gone??? Purely Coverage Banking??? | 31 | 1h |
| +57 | Is DCM actually underrated ? | 24 | 12h |
| +48 | Losing my personality in Banking | 9 | 12h |
| +48 | How do I understand vs. just memorizing? | 5 | 10h |
| +47 | Are all Tech / TMT groups sweaty? | 38 | 13h |
| +42 | Associate & Above IB exits | 16 | 3d |
| +32 | Incoming IB Analyst: Best Ways to Prepare? | 10 | 9h |
| +27 | Which groups are ideal for laterals? | 12 | 11h |
| +24 | The good and bad with Wells Fargo | 1 | 17h |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
When comparing GS TMT (San Francisco) and MS Menlo Park for M&A, both are highly regarded players in the tech M&A space, but there are some nuances to consider:
Qatalyst's Dominance in M&A: You're correct that Qatalyst is a powerhouse in tech M&A, particularly for sell-side advisory. Their lean teams, high comp, and focus on significant transactions make them a standout. However, GS TMT and MS Menlo are still very competitive and often handle some of the largest and most complex deals in the space.
GS TMT (San Francisco): GS TMT is known for its strong M&A presence, particularly in the Bay Area. They consistently work on high-profile deals and have a strong reputation for both M&A and IPO advisory. GS TMT analysts often have excellent exit opportunities into tech-focused PE, VC, and growth equity roles.
MS Menlo Park: Historically, MS Menlo has been a leader in tech IPOs and M&A, with Michael Grimes playing a pivotal role in its success. However, as you mentioned, Grimes' departure to government could impact the group. That said, MS Menlo still has a strong brand and deal flow, particularly in IPOs and large-cap tech M&A.
Trends and Comparisons:
Conclusion: While Qatalyst remains a dominant force in tech M&A, GS TMT and MS Menlo are still highly competitive. The departure of Grimes could shift the dynamics slightly, potentially giving GS TMT an edge in M&A. However, both groups remain excellent choices for anyone looking to build a career in tech investment banking or transition to the buyside.
Sources: How are the TMT groups at “lesser” BBs?, Qatalyst Partners, , GS COO of M&A Leaves for PWP, Full-time: Goldman (NY Classic - not TMT/FIG) vs. Morgan Stanley Tech (Menlo Park) vs. Evercore M&A (NY)
Nisi aliquam sed velit qui sint quas. Omnis et unde laudantium non. Corrupti molestiae optio ea tempora ut qui ab harum. Dolorum quia voluptas rerum possimus.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...