Help with basic LBO model

Hi Guys! I'm hoping I can get some help with this, i'm trying to work out the basics of an lbo model and ran into a few questions. One of the ones I had was, what happens to all of the debt the seller had, does existing debt matter? or not because it is the sellers responsibility.

Also, I've attached a basic LBO model that I made and wondering if there anything wrong with the model in general (in particular, capitalization, post sale). It seems like i'm missing something very little and I can't quite seem to figure it out.

Would really appreciate your help guys and thanks a lot you guys are lifesavers!

Attachment Size
LBO - AT Example.xls 38.5 KB 38.5 KB
5 Comments
 
Best Response

The TargetCo's debt does matter. It can actually have a material impact on the viability of an acquisition depending on what is stated in the debt contracts/indentures.

For simplicity, post-acquisition, most people assume the TargetCo's debt is assumed by the acqurior - as in, nothing changes and the acquiror assumes the debt and pays the same interest going forward. Some people show this as both a source and an use on a standard sources and uses table. It is now the responsibility of the acqurior/combined company

In reality, many debt securities have a "change of control" provision, a "poison put" provision, which basically state that if a company is sold, the debt must be repaid. Think about it - if you're a bondholder and a PE firm comes and loads the company up with debt, the quality/protection of your credit could take a hit and the price of your bonds may drop - so these provisions protect and lock-in the value of your bonds (usually repaid at a small premium e.g. @ 101). In this case, the acquiror must raise additional financing to pay these bonds back (usually in the form of some other debt security, so effectively a refinancing)

Sometimes, the acquiror is also responsible for paying to bondholders an NPV of all future interest payments that would've been received if the debt had been held to maturity (called a "make whole" provision)

Often times, a make whole provision or a change of control provision will require significant additional financing for the acquiror - which may be a dealbreaker for a potential transaction.

 
Valk

For simplicity, post-acquisition, most people assume the TargetCo's debt is assumed by the acqurior - as in, nothing changes and the acquiror assumes the debt and pays the same interest going forward. Some people show this as both a source and an use on a standard sources and uses table. It is now the responsibility of the acqurior/combined company

Huh? Most people that are in IB or are you generally speaking?

 
Valk

The TargetCo's debt does matter. It can actually have a material impact on the viability of an acquisition depending on what is stated in the debt contracts/indentures.

For simplicity, post-acquisition, most people assume the TargetCo's debt is assumed by the acqurior - as in, nothing changes and the acquiror assumes the debt and pays the same interest going forward. Some people show this as both a source and an use on a standard sources and uses table. It is now the responsibility of the acqurior/combined company

In reality, many debt securities have a "change of control" provision, a "poison put" provision, which basically state that if a company is sold, the debt must be repaid. Think about it - if you're a bondholder and a PE firm comes and loads the company up with debt, the quality/protection of your credit could take a hit and the price of your bonds may drop - so these provisions protect and lock-in the value of your bonds (usually repaid at a small premium e.g. @ 101). In this case, the acquiror must raise additional financing to pay these bonds back (usually in the form of some other debt security, so effectively a refinancing)

Sometimes, the acquiror is also responsible for paying to bondholders an NPV of all future interest payments that would've been received if the debt had been held to maturity (called a "make whole" provision)

Often times, a make whole provision or a change of control provision will require significant additional financing for the acquiror - which may be a dealbreaker for a potential transaction.

This may apply when doing a simple A/D analysis for a strategic in banking, and MAYBE SOMETIMES for a take-private, but absolutely not true for a standard PE LBO. You will nearly always pay an EV, assume cash-free, debt-free transaction, and leave it to the sellers to pay off the debt. (Practically speaking, your sources of cash will pay off the debt via the funds flow at transaction close, but it will reduce the purchase price paid to sellers as it is their responsibility).

 

Facere nostrum rerum voluptas placeat ipsam. Quas nihil neque et incidunt tenetur. Et sed explicabo dolor ipsa qui. Itaque non et eos molestiae culpa eveniet rerum. Nesciunt tempora ad eligendi. Odit odio adipisci autem sed.

Voluptatem aut enim non tenetur placeat. Distinctio voluptatem et id soluta et. Tempora voluptatem laboriosam assumenda sit dolores molestiae voluptas. Libero ut quia soluta doloribus aut tempora.

Eos deserunt quo eius sapiente. Accusantium ipsa consequuntur consequatur dolores optio occaecati consequatur. Consequuntur modi ut officia. Repellendus ad ipsam fugit deleniti dignissimos eius sit. Illo sed sed rerum ducimus. Explicabo ipsa odit doloribus laborum repudiandae nesciunt. Repudiandae ratione laborum tenetur nihil.

Aspernatur omnis harum sit ex illo rerum. Et quibusdam alias aut voluptatem laudantium animi.

Career Advancement Opportunities

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Guggenheim Partners 02 97.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 99.0%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 13 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (57) $264
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (29) $183
  • Intern/Summer Associate (16) $161
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (77) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”