For someone interested in the energy industry/energy banking long-term, would you recommend the dominant Houston boutiques (EVR/Moelis/Lazard) or RBC? RBC Houston has been doing great recently and obviously has a balance sheet to fall back on, while boutiques give more experience as an analyst/lean deal teams etc.
please give thoughts, thanks!
| +448 | Change My Mind: Banks Shouldn’t Hire Foreigners at All | 117 | 1h |
| +229 | Article - UBS’ Investment Bank Keeps Losing Ground | 34 | 17h |
| +125 | Don’t work at UBS - UBS Sucks | 14 | 3h |
| +81 | An Exhaustive Guide: How to Solve Every Single Accretion/Dilution Question | 7 | 22m |
| +59 | When to Leave Office as Intern | 8 | 2d |
| +44 | Best IB Group Overall? | 27 | 1h |
| +38 | Would you rather be a Touse Squid or a Bouse Mogger in IB | 2 | 2d |
| +31 | STEM student lost in London IB recruiting | 17 | 1d |
| +30 | What do you say to ppl who don’t know EVR/LAZ/CVP/PJT | 22 | 1d |
| +22 | Should My Intern Get a Return Offer? | 8 | 18m |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
Moelis and Lazard are not dominant in Houston lol. The only EB in Houston that's super strong is EVR. But if you care about overall name prestige, you'd probs choose any of those 3 over RBC.
If you care solely about deal exposure within traditional energy than I would rank it as EVR >= RBC > Moelis > Lazard.
Moelis is top 2 - they are on EQT, ConocoPhillips, and have 50 deals in the pipeline
Having worked for some of those seniors in the past, "50 deals in the pipeline" is so meaningless. Half of those are DOA with the client
Don't have a real opinion on the rankings here but you really can't put much stock into pipeline numbers
Congrats on Moelis!
They're usually underrated on here because people expected them to be peak Citi immediately which isn’t how it works when teams switch banks. It takes a while to ramp and even longer if you’re gunning for long cycle corp deals (they brew for a while). They’re probably like B+ tier now, would expect them in A in a couple years.
S is still definitively GS and Jefferies with Evercore either bottom of S or top of A depending on time scale (good year this year but had a trough period for a bit)
Lazard literally does nothing
Also noticed their HTX O&G/P&R group was probably their weakest groups when recruiting out of ug, considering their HC, RX, and Industrials groups are among the best on the street. However, I’m still conditioned to believe any group at Lazard could lead to insane MF exits.
Jefferies should be in that conversation
Moelis is just hyped now because of Trauber.. Evercore does deals. Lazard does not.
Goldman Sachs/Jefferies/Evercore run Houston at the moment
I lived in Houston and worked in corp dev at a super major briefly. GS, Jeff and EVC are the dominant players in Houston's IB scene. In terms of working at one of these firms, EVC is probably the best in terms of overall culture, pay, experience, etc.. They get worked hard but everyone I know that worked there spoke highly of the experience.
As far as your question goes, I saw RBC on a lot more deals than LAZ/MOE for sure, but RBC definitely got fewer mandates than EVC.
How would you rate your time spent in corp dev at a super major? Did you get to work on a lot of deals?
I wasn't there for long, but it was fine. I ended up starting my own business and left on good terms.
can i pm you?
Ut dicta et et minima accusantium perferendis. Voluptatem deleniti molestiae error qui aut.
Maiores laborum provident praesentium suscipit aliquid sit. Fugit quo blanditiis eos eligendi at. Eum quibusdam explicabo sapiente laudantium dolore et. Tempore maiores cupiditate expedita non nisi inventore asperiores nam. Ipsam voluptates soluta et nam. Laboriosam occaecati ipsa quis ut.
Et dolores quia modi cumque minima vel occaecati illum. Consectetur aperiam enim exercitationem sunt. Porro at et error adipisci neque temporibus dolorem. Nam totam non est.
Quas a soluta est qui. Nesciunt in voluptatem alias aliquid et. Voluptatem officiis alias magni ea deserunt commodi sit.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...