How Are Bonus Decisions Made?
How are bonus decisions made? What criteria goes into determining buckets? Is it based on group or division revenue?
How are bonus decisions made? What criteria goes into determining buckets? Is it based on group or division revenue?
| +374 | Which Offer to Accept: UBS Analyst Role or Part Time Cashier at the Local Taco Bell | 44 | 8h |
| +291 | Roku-Fox Deal - UBS Misses Out on yet another deals after years chasing this deal | 31 | 8h |
| +272 | TPH V.S. Mizuho [HOU] | 33 | 4h |
| +270 | AI is insane | 38 | 4h |
| +269 | I Snuck Into UBS Office And Took A Shit On The Floor | 26 | 11h |
| +221 | Best Power/Renewables/Energy Teams? | 35 | 5h |
| +202 | Useless associates | 36 | 7h |
| +184 | Differences in Restructuring Teams? | 33 | 7h |
| +181 | Centerview HC group falling off? | 28 | 8h |
| +181 | Actual EB List | 26 | 4h |
Career Resources
Based on the most helpful WSO content, here are the key points regarding how bonus decisions are made and the criteria involved:
Group Head's Influence:
Individual Contributions:
Static vs. Variable Amounts:
Experience and Performance:
Revenue and Group Performance:
Bonus Tiers:
In summary, bonus decisions are multifaceted, involving individual performance, group head influence, and sometimes static amounts across groups. Personal contributions and the ability to link work directly to the firm's profitability are critical factors.
Sources: 2015-2016 salary & bonus discussion, 2015-2016 salary & bonus discussion, 2020 bonuses, Associate guide on analyzing an income statement, How is bonus split determined (ie cash vs stock)
bump
Generally speaking, there are 3-4 main factors:
1) Group: some groups are generating more revenues than others so a fixed bonus will flow to the groups raking in more deal flow as opposed to the groups sitting on their thumbs pitching and doing jack shit most of the year. This principle also applies to regional office differences.
2) Performance: within your group, the top performers will get compensated more relative to their less performing peers. U.S. low performers may get 40-50% of base while top performers 80%+ of base. London the bonus range is more extreme: low performers getting next to nothing while top performers in the same range as US counterparts sometimes more even.
3) Politics: you need to play the politics game. Sometimes this can be optics and others just being good boy subordinate kissing ass all the time. Ultimately, perception can go a long way in some groups. I have seen and know many people getting better reviews and bonuses due to this aspect alone. If you are the keener guy who is a master of Excel and PPT without the political/charismatic charm, the guy who can do the job still adequately and check these boxes will probably receive more clout when bonuses are being considered.
Hope this helps.
if youre in a regional office and you have a vp staffer but a md that runs the office, who has ultimately / larger sway in bonus decisions. iirc, the regional office folks talk abt it with hq people and it seems like its up to the ultimate discretion of hq folks. dunno if any other regional office people can chime in and relate.
Commodi qui possimus officiis aut sed voluptatem quibusdam. Non aut modi sed. Autem molestiae non sed aut molestiae.
Dolores reprehenderit ut molestias est voluptatibus omnis sint autem. Molestiae voluptas itaque qui. Voluptatem beatae modi quo aut est cupiditate minus dolores. Excepturi commodi ad dignissimos vitae consectetur dolorum facere.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Est officia laborum numquam et inventore in. Reprehenderit possimus magni a.
Inventore eos nostrum aspernatur reiciendis. Corrupti quo fugit eos ut. Et voluptatibus fugiat ut nihil officia quae ut aut.