How Come People On here Make fun of Certain firms?
Why do people on here scoff at those who work in firms like BMO or RBC?
Isn't doing Front office work there still an incredible job for a 22 year old?
Why do people on here scoff at those who work in firms like BMO or RBC?
Isn't doing Front office work there still an incredible job for a 22 year old?
| +439 | Female bankers doing brand deals on TikTok | 119 | 4h |
| +142 | UBS rolling out Enhanced Clean Desk Policy, bans deal toys | 16 | 3d |
| +100 | Starting FT in a city 3 hours away, dad has progressing Parkinson's. Looking for advice. | 8 | 1d |
| +73 | JULY 2026 CHICAGO BANK RANKINGS | 29 | 3h |
| +64 | Restructuring is paradise (a completely unbiased account) | 6 | 4d |
| +37 | Not Treated Well by Other Interns | 20 | 1d |
| +36 | Handling frustration | 5 | 4d |
| +35 | Taking days off as an intern | 17 | 4h |
| +28 | Thoughts on Intrepid - Houlihan Merger | 10 | 3d |
| +27 | IB TikTok Influencers (wehave2wizards) | 9 | 3d |
Career Resources
Just students. Ones you are Analyst you don’t care anymore
Insecurity
This is an industry that thrives on rent-seeking and eating the biggest slice of the pie. It's always nice to reassure yourself that others are getting smaller slices than you.
The answer to your question is that, yes, a front office role at many of the firms discussed on this forum should be considered a professionally impressive achievement for new graduates. Hell, a front office role at many of these firms is impressive regardless of one's age.
Assuming most members are forthright in their placement and advice, you must remember that this forum is a vacuum. The professional experiences of this forum's members stand in stark contrast to the realities of many Americans. As to the endless ranking threads, I assume this is a result of insecurity, boredom, and sought after validation. The behavior on these threads mirrors a lot of the behavior that I noticed during my undergraduate years when fraternity and sorority rankings were constantly debated, argued, and scrutinized.
When you find that the absurdity of some of these topics is unbearable, make sure to scroll through the thread and take count of the number of verified users engaging in the conversation.
LMAO straight facts, WSO is slowly turning into the finance version of GreekRank
It'll calm down, let's not exaggerate here :)
I think that, as others have said, it is mainly the result of boredom. And, you know, rankings have never been the focus of our greatest minds I'm sure.
However (ignoring any criticism of any particular firm), I think this is worthwhile for one and only one reason: in finance (or any other old and established industry) you see stagnating giants and this is clearly because a) the company is already big enough that it will just make money by existing b) the people who are left are just babies who never achieved anything of value in their life so now they have no idea how to keep growing the firm (i.e. how to make it a true BB) and are now just glorified paper pushers doing essentially nothing of value and living off the glory of the previous generations who actually grew the business
I think we should mock stagnating giants. It points to a culture of mediocrity and ineptitude. I'm not talking about any particular bank here of course.
I am not sure I understand b). Seems a bit extreme and as if your personal vendetta with a one-off line manager/incident has skewed your world view all of a sudden. I might be misinterpreting and I am genuinely interested in the idea you are proposing.
I did phrase b) a bit extremely but it really is like this. I just think it is funny when you have giant corporations who hire the best of the best (at least on paper), have insane amounts of money to invest and yet you see them losing money all the time. That's what I mean by an stagnating giant and I think we should mock them either to push them to stop being so stupid or to just laugh and enjoy their ride to bankruptcy, where their massive bloat will stop hoarding resources and other more deserving institutions will get their lost business.
Well, in the case of Tobin and Co. it's warranted.
I think there's a degree of self-selection among people choosing to pursue the IB -- there's generally a big focus on getting onto the best "path," with "best" being driven largely by the names on your resume. We spend a LOT of time on here talking about which target schools to go to, and then which top BB / EB to get a job at, and then which MF to exit to, and then which M7 business school to attend. The problem with focusing on things like these is that you end up deriving a lot of your self-worth from the names on your resume rather than your experience at those places, so people with "good" names tend to look down upon those with "bad" names in order to justify the fact that they're actually miserable in their job
Same reason people make fun of certain sports teams, colleges, or even other people (classmates, colleagues, friends).
Maybe it's insecurity. Maybe it's boredom. Maybe DB sucks. Maybe it's just trolling. It's been happening on WSO since its inception, you just learn to tune it out over time.
It's human nature to some extent. * FO vs. BO * MBB versus "Tier 2" consulting firms * "Big 4" vs. other accounting firms and even then, D vs. EY vs. PwC vs. KPMG memes * Military branch rivalries: Marines "eating crayons" vs. "Chair Force," lower PT requirements in certain forces, lower ASVAB requirements in others * "FAANG" "MAFAANG" or whatever the acronym is now
I think that much of the mocking comes from others pushing too strongly in the other direction. As a member of this form for around a year, I've seen more shitting on IU and RBC in the past week than I have for months at a time. This is happening because people in a shitty situation still have a chip on their shoulder and want to believe that they are at the next Goldman Sachs. However, everyone sees right through it because nobody would actually choose IU Kelley over even the lowest semi-target.
.
Why feed the flames?
Because they're nerds with an inferiority complex the size of Jupiter that needs their egos to be stroked.
Like, who cares? If you're a rockstar junior banker/trader/analyst/sales you'll succeed and thrive anywhere (obviously within reasonable bounds e.g. bulge bracket)
Nesciunt dolores velit magni ducimus officiis suscipit fugit. Consectetur quam tempora ea mollitia eius. Quo nulla beatae et aut reprehenderit. Officia quos est necessitatibus pariatur accusantium tempore reiciendis.
Et commodi voluptate enim saepe. Eaque quis possimus alias ut autem aut explicabo. Ut cupiditate veritatis nesciunt cum placeat aliquid quae quisquam.
Rerum qui soluta dolorem cum voluptas natus enim. Rerum aut inventore esse est. Facilis harum aut et quaerat atque.
Soluta cupiditate atque asperiores tempora qui vel. Fugiat sed inventore magnam consectetur modi officia assumenda sunt. Iure voluptas voluptas dicta dicta quae illo ratione unde.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...