39 Comments
 
Most Helpful

PJT: Leans towards debtors and is usually on some of the highest profile cases. Viewed as the most prestigious RX group because the group is 2 and out so the firm really emphasizes/supports PE recruiting, and as a result of that combined with being the most target-heavy/selective RX group, PJT RSSG has the best buyside placements.

Lazard: Stalwart debtor advisors, gets a lot of high profile retail, industrials, and energy mandates. Also the stalwart sovereign advisors (although you won't be working on those deals). Large portion of the group is in Chicago.

HL: Leans towards creditors. Volume shop, and picks up a mix of high profile mandates with many smaller mandates. Group is split across several offices and each office operates relatively independently, so know the culture/deal flow/exits that the office you're interested in focuses on. 

Moelis: On some of the highest profile cases with a good split between debtor and creditor. Absolutely crushed the rescue financing train in 2020 and has largely managed to carry that momentum (relative to other RX groups) through 2021. Most RX deals are run out of NY.

PWP: Mix of both debtor and creditor deals. Absolutely crushed the energy RX game, and has great deal flow across industrials, healthcare, and TMT as well. Slightly smaller group that picks up fewer mandates than the groups above, but they get very good mandates. 

Evercore: Good mix of debtor and creditor. A bit more under the radar and the group can be a bit quieter than the groups above, but they still do great, with a lot of sponsor-related deal flow. Not as big of a presence in RX compared to PJT/Lazard/HL but the Evercore name elevates the group's exits.

Centerview: Much smaller practice than the ones above, but they still get on their fair share of high profile deals. 

 
Funniest

DJSol69

PJT: Leans towards debtors and is usually on some of the highest profile cases. Viewed as the most prestigious RX group because the group is 2 and out so the firm really emphasizes/supports PE recruiting, and as a result of that combined with being the most target-heavy/selective RX group, PJT RSSG has the best buyside placements.

Lazard: Stalwart debtor advisors, gets a lot of high profile retail, industrials, and energy mandates. Also the stalwart sovereign advisors (although you won't be working on those deals). Large portion of the group is in Chicago.

HL: Leans towards creditors. Volume shop, and picks up a mix of high profile mandates with many smaller mandates. Group is split across several offices and each office operates relatively independently, so know the culture/deal flow/exits that the office you're interested in focuses on. 

Moelis: On some of the highest profile cases with a good split between debtor and creditor. Absolutely crushed the rescue financing train in 2020 and has largely managed to carry that momentum (relative to other RX groups) through 2021. Most RX deals are run out of NY.

PWP: Mix of both debtor and creditor deals. Absolutely crushed the energy RX game, and has great deal flow across industrials, healthcare, and TMT as well. Slightly smaller group that picks up fewer mandates than the groups above, but they get very good mandates. 

Evercore: Good mix of debtor and creditor. A bit more under the radar and the group can be a bit quieter than the groups above, but they still do great, with a lot of sponsor-related deal flow. Not as big of a presence in RX compared to PJT/Lazard/HL but the Evercore name elevates the group's exits.

Centerview: Much smaller practice than the ones above, but they still get on their fair share of high profile deals. 

While I agree with the information here, hard to not comment on the blatant plagiarism from this post back in late 2020. OP, here is the thread, would encourage you to give it a read as most of the information is still relevant. Original post below for reference.

https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forum/investment-banking/best-eb-restructuring-groups-in-2021#comment-2294778

Would first preface by saying that this is all fairly subjective, especially since restructuring league tables are notoriously inaccurate (reporting is highly inconsistent, many advisors remain undisclosed, out of court transactions are a black box, etc.). At the end of the day, all of these groups are great and all of the analysts are getting cranked, so pour one out.

Currently an analyst in one of the above mentioned groups, so below is my perspective on each of the firms and their business, based on my personal experience and supplemented by those of my friends, and Debtwire and Reorg reporting. I'll tick through some of the tiers / firms as I see it, open to others' thoughts.

Here goes, in no particular order:

Houlihan: Kings of volume. One of the go-to calls for creditors and increasing presence on debtor reps. This hasn't changed in the pandemic. #1 on deal volume, definitely near the top for deal value, broader range on deal size (low ~100m deals) than others due to the size of the group.

PJT / Moelis: Present on some of the most high profile cases, doing very well, likely top in terms of deal value. Both pretty quick on the rescue financing train post COVID. Balanced split between debtor / creditor.

Lazard: Stalwart debtor advisors, crushed it on the big high profile retail cases earlier in the year, solid energy deal flow too. Big in sovereign RX advisory too.

Evercore: Great practice, bit of a slower start from my perspective, but doing well. Lot of sponsor restructuring deal flow.

Greenhill: Less momentum than previous cycles, wider range of deal sizes. Have had varying success this round but have won roles on some notable cases.

Centerview: Dark horse this cycle. Much smaller practice than the others above, but they're on a surprisingly large number of high profile / deal value cases. Great representation per capita and some very good momentum. 

Perella: Crushing the energy RX game. This cycle really showing their investment in TPH down in Houston is paying off. Solid deal flow in other sectors.

Guggenheim: Present and active this cycle. On some big names but not as active as the other groups above, although I have limited knowledge here.

Rothschild: Don't know a whole lot about these guys. Along with Lazard, usually lead in sovereign advisory mandates. Got debtor side for Chesapeake with Intrepid, which is a big win. Haven't seen them around on many others though - open to others' opinions.

Jefferies: Not a large player in restructuring these days, have had some success in out-of-court workouts. Feel like strategic priority of the firm has shifted towards the origination / syndication of leveraged loans as opposed to restructuring advisory. I view these as fundamental opposites and the concentration of UCC mandates (vs. traditional debtor / creditor reps) further supports this.  

Ducera: Relatively newer name and coming out swinging this cycle, higher concentration of creditor reps but certainly gaining momentum and a strong contender.   

-----

Happy to give perspectives on any other firms people are curious about.

 

Jefferies - I hear its a VERY Lean group, something like less than 30 (from A1 to MD), but most newer MD's in the division come from Greenhill RX and Evercore RX. Seems like they're trying to build it slowly, and we have been seeing them more across our pitches.

 

Would push back on Evercore not being as big of a presence, pretty dominant for debtor in oil and gas mandates. Also group is usually pretty busy since when RX volume is down analysts work on some of the harrier debt advisory deals so never really "quiet" for better or worse

 

Definitely trending downwards. Firm has lost almost all of its mid-level staff in the last year due to culture issues. Analyst experience is okay if you think mediocre exits are worth stomaching the treatment under Augustine for two years.

 

Moelis is bigger in RX than Evercore lmao, Evercore is a tier below PJT/HL/LAZ/MC

 

EVR did the 2nd, 8th, and 11th largest debtor mandates of 2020 for Frontier ($22bn), McDermott ($10bn), and Seadrill ($7bn)

Moelis did the 1st and 14th for Hertz ($24bn) and JC Penny ($7bn) 

 

Joking right?

HL LA? Both the group heads sit in New York and most of the team, the co-head of liability management sits in LA. HL also does not cross staff, so its only LA mandates. Its a great shop, they work a ton, but to say equivalent to RSSG and clearly above the rest is a bit of a stretch. 

Also not sure about ur Evercore rank. All are good shops with good experience though. 

2020 RX Leagut Tables

2020 League Tables

 

Quis quidem consequatur est quia accusamus ut. Ad aut rerum corrupti voluptas nostrum quaerat sed quod. Quo doloribus veniam et beatae.

Corrupti qui voluptatem quas ea et. Mollitia deserunt et eaque autem consequatur quas voluptatem. Odio fugiat eaque quod voluptatem. Provident consequatur sequi voluptas aliquam.

 

Provident amet qui est illum. Aut eaque at consequatur ea quia voluptate. Consequatur est et exercitationem repudiandae voluptas. Ipsum labore ratione deserunt aliquid commodi. Amet optio nesciunt voluptas sapiente provident possimus totam maxime. Pariatur nam nulla ut aut ea mollitia doloremque. Nobis illo non officiis laborum soluta quasi necessitatibus.

Rerum doloremque harum voluptatem ipsam placeat fugiat ea. Omnis et quos ipsum similique odit et. Voluptas sequi quis quidem illum qui ipsa quo. Autem totam in enim culpa blanditiis voluptas quis.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.3%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (44) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (78) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (72) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”