Pretty F*cked up shit. Pray to God none of this crap passes...right now its only talk, lets keep it that way.

"Greed, in all of its forms; greed for life, for money, for love, for knowledge has marked the upward surge of mankind. And greed, you mark my words, will not only save Teldar Paper, but that other malfunctioning corporation called the USA."
 
Edmundo Braverman:
Yeah, you're right. WTF??? Taxpayers should keep covering that shit.

Get a clue.

A flat tax on all financial institutions including HF and insurance companies regardless of what they did before/during the financial crisis. Then it will be adjusted by riskiness!!

There is more than enough blame to go around for the financial crisis. Its starts with individuals, goes to governments who forced lenders to lend/lessened lending standards, and goes to everyone else.....

"Greed, in all of its forms; greed for life, for money, for love, for knowledge has marked the upward surge of mankind. And greed, you mark my words, will not only save Teldar Paper, but that other malfunctioning corporation called the USA."
 
Edmundo Braverman:
Yeah, you're right. WTF??? Taxpayers should keep covering that shit.

Get a clue.

The point is that the tax is going to cover "future bailouts", which makes it an absolutely terrible idea.

  1. What happens if the governments decide to just use it to fund other "programs" in the meantime? There's pretty clear precedent for doing it.

  2. Levying a tax intended for future bailouts pretty much justifies and guarantees future bailouts, while at the same time, doesn't really prevent bailouts from exceeding the available funds. If you're "too big to fail" and x amount isn't "enough", you'll just ask for more. If banks were remotely smart, they'd drain the fund next crisis and use the same "too big" logic to ask for more.

BBC:
The measures are designed to make banks pay for the costs of future financial and economic rescue packages.
 
singularity:
If banks were remotely smart, they'd drain the fund next crisis and use the same "too big" logic to ask for more.

I've got no problem with that. They'd only be screwing themselves and not the taxpayers. As for asking for more, the people could tell them to get bent.

I'm really curious, guys. Why are you all so against making the banks competitive again? Are you all just afraid the punchbowl is being taken away before you got to it? Because there is certainly no free market argument in favor of the status quo.

 

Banks can start by being more responsible. Think of it as....insurance. Like FDIC.

You know, it would be fine if banks took ridiculous risks (NINJA loans=you're ASKING to be robbed blind) if they didn't bring the whole economy down with them when they go down in flames.

"We are lawyers! We sue people! Occasionally, we get aggressive and garnish wages, but WE DO NOT ABDUCT!" -Boston Legal-
 
Best Response

To respond to Braverman's last point -

If banks create a reserve fund of X (through an obligatory tax) - then they'll just adjust their risk aversion to accomodate X such that it increases their risk appetite. The crash will require X + whatever they lost that was unforseen - it invites a bigger crash.

The way to tackle this problem isn't through penal populist arbitration, it's through law. Limit coverage in law, limite exposure in law. Create a body which has to pass newly created products before they're retailed - an effective body though, not the SEC or FSA which is a blanket organisation.

These are useful changes, which help. A carpet bomb tax does nothing but take money out of the economy, put it in governments pocket, and increase the bank's long term risk preference.

 

Ullam qui sint nihil quo unde. In tempore quasi est assumenda.

Aut sunt dolore consequatur recusandae id. Est velit nihil quis qui est. Consequatur et excepturi libero odio quis enim. Consequatur asperiores ea rerum dolorem hic doloremque illo. Quia iure eaque velit quis sit. Ex quae animi magni porro et.

Sapiente error consectetur explicabo aut at minus minima. Vel consequatur tempore labore.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 04 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (20) $385
  • Associates (88) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (67) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”