Increase price by $1 or revenue by $1

If you have a hardware and a software/internet business: would you rather increase price by $1 or revenue by $1 for each business. My logic is that for a software or internet business, adding an additional customer would not be associated w/ much variable cost, as the software or internet business already has fixed costs like hosting set up. Thus an increase in revenue would mainly flow to income statement. For a hardware business, producing an additional unit requires significant variable cost (materials, manufacturing, etc).

I could have it the other way around, though.

21 Comments
 

In the comment above you mentioned that you meant to say increase in volume...so lets pretend you decrease price by $1 which means a substantial increase in volume.

How do you think that decrease will affect your revenue, profits, working capital, leverage and cashflow in both the short-term and the long term?

 

I think both would be price – I would explain that I assume the costs associated would stay the same. A lot of software businesses are able to increase price once they have locked in competitors and build a moat in terms of users/tech/etc. On the hardware side, I would assume that margins would be lower on revenue, and a $1 increase in price would most likely outweigh the lost business. Although both examples rely heavilyon assumptions...

 

I think the question is would you prefer a $1 increase in price or a $1 increase in revenue, as originally stated. Software companies tend to trade (be acquired / valued) on revenue multiples. So if you increase price from say $100 to $101 you see an increase of $1. However, if the company is expected to trade at 10x revenue, and originally has $10 in revenue which can increase $1 to $11, when you apply the same 10x multiple, you will have a price of $110.

Answer is $1 in revenue. The same would apply for EBITDA of a company expected to trade on this metric. The difference is $1 in price is just that while $1 in revenue has a 10x amplification on price (e.g. $10).

Hope this helps.

 
Most Helpful
"bankerbyday1" I think the question is would you prefer a $1 increase in price or a $1 increase in revenue, as originally stated. Software companies tend to trade (be acquired / valued) on revenue multiples. So if you increase price from say $100 to $101 you see an increase of $1. However, if the company is expected to trade at 10x revenue, and originally has $10 in revenue which can increase $1 to $11, when you apply the same 10x multiple, you will have a price of $110.

Answer is $1 in revenue. The same would apply for EBITDA of a company expected to trade on this metric. The difference is $1 in price is just that while $1 in revenue has a 10x amplification on price (e.g. $10).

Hope this helps.

This is terrible.. Then the question is just trying to trick you lol. You can make up any example and go either way. Also your statement that "$1 in price is just that," is false as you can see in the below trivial example

E.g. volume = 10, price = 1; then rev = 10. In this case $1 increase in price doubles revenue. You would prefer price.

Much more realistic is volume vs price which a principal on our tech team loved to ask assoc candidates.

 

Purchase price as in EV. This is straight from every interview guide. Most tech companies operate on a recurring revenue model (e.g. long term contracts with rev set), not widgets where you simply raise the price. I suppose you could raise the price of the contract by a dollar but industry bankers do not speak like this.

If you want to look at it from the perspective of raising the price of an individual good, then sure, your response works.

 

Ipsa dolorem qui eum ut. Illo rerum non aliquid culpa optio itaque molestias minima. At consequatur et cupiditate et velit iusto molestiae. Quasi qui voluptas animi est.

Sint omnis quisquam architecto et. Voluptatem accusantium dolor eveniet eligendi voluptatem iste. Eligendi quia occaecati amet dicta culpa non deserunt. Odio impedit maiores voluptates minus.

Non eum placeat ullam maxime. Itaque et beatae minima velit ducimus est.

Iste qui incidunt omnis nihil. Labore quasi occaecati saepe sed neque iusto vero. Provident officia velit magni.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (67) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”