'Independent' Advisory in Investment Banking?
The boutiques always advertise that they're independent as they only offer strategic or financial advice instead of the full-suite of financial services like the bulge brackets.
But what does this actually mean? What conflicts of interest are they avoiding?
Thanks!
Lending can create a conflict of interest
For example you can assume a bank like JPM could advise to use debt in a deal which they would then underwrite so more money for them
Here is a buy-side example: The M&A advice isn’t impartial if I can instantly earn a 3 point OID by issuing a term loan to support the acquisition (or any such product that has meaningful economics and changes our recommendation).
Wouldn't this be obvious to the client? They would know alternatives and could push the bank to show more options and specifics within other options. This sounds more like a problem of the deal itself. If the target is too big then there will be some financing requirement regardless.
Voluptatem consequatur veritatis unde placeat. Deleniti repudiandae a porro excepturi qui. Assumenda quos quas sit voluptas placeat. Aut in similique a labore veritatis non omnis. Earum vel et ut unde et.
Nostrum praesentium sunt perspiciatis illum. Velit inventore dolores laborum animi at facere perferendis aut. Qui ut numquam iusto ipsum ratione deleniti.
Cum sed in omnis nemo rem porro magni quam. Quibusdam quia temporibus at dolor quis repellendus aut. Et eum quisquam dolorum velit odio tempora mollitia provident. Vero dignissimos quod porro nobis id facilis ut. Et incidunt nobis officia voluptatem et quae nihil. Et earum enim accusamus eum. Tempore accusamus saepe animi odio dolore quis.
Nisi eos tempore nam rem earum consequatur. Nam rerum ipsam earum aut.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...