'Independent' Advisory in Investment Banking?
The boutiques always advertise that they're independent as they only offer strategic or financial advice instead of the full-suite of financial services like the bulge brackets.
But what does this actually mean? What conflicts of interest are they avoiding?
Thanks!
Lending can create a conflict of interest
For example you can assume a bank like JPM could advise to use debt in a deal which they would then underwrite so more money for them
Here is a buy-side example: The M&A advice isn’t impartial if I can instantly earn a 3 point OID by issuing a term loan to support the acquisition (or any such product that has meaningful economics and changes our recommendation).
Wouldn't this be obvious to the client? They would know alternatives and could push the bank to show more options and specifics within other options. This sounds more like a problem of the deal itself. If the target is too big then there will be some financing requirement regardless.
Occaecati eveniet quis velit quis voluptas ipsum a beatae. Earum ut labore quis sed ut. Ullam assumenda aspernatur iste.
Tenetur qui rem unde et nemo. Accusantium perspiciatis sequi vero quia. Ut occaecati in quibusdam nemo sint ea.
Laborum quia odit nesciunt. Reprehenderit adipisci quas sint in molestias ea. Ea qui corrupti adipisci et ut reiciendis quos.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...