IRR = discount rate = cost of equity

In one of the Scenarios I ran for a valuation, I reduced sales every year by 2% and the resulting IRR is 10% equal to the discount rate I used. Company has no debt, so IRR is equal to the cost of equity.

Is this a good thing?

I interpret it as "even in the downside scenario" we will still have met the shareholders expected return. I'm I right?

5 Comments
 
Most Helpful

Your IRR tells you the discount rate, which would yield an NPV of 0.

The higher the IRR, the higher the upside "cushion" for your cost of capital as it marks the pivot at which your NPV turns negative. Likewise, the higher the IRR, the more profitable a project is deemed on a relative basis. (NPV lacks this power of comparison for projects of different length and scale, due to the fact that it is just an absolute number)

Now, on to the scenario question: Your downside scenario sets the discount rate equal to the IRR. All this says is that the downside scenario for capital costs is located at this turning point.

You're statement is thereby: In the worst case imaginable, my cost of capital will be @ x%, setting the NPV of the project to 0. Investors win nothing vs. an investment of comparable risk, but they also lose nothing compared to the similar investment. The returns should come out as expected for an asset of this risk class. Wether this is good or not depends on the other projects, how they see their own risk (which is funneled into the cost of capital) and how aggressively they will forecast their operating model (will determine where THEY see their downside scenario located).

 
"weit23" Your IRR tells you the discount rate, which would yield an NPV of 0.

The higher the IRR, the higher the upside "cushion" for your cost of capital as it marks the pivot at which your NPV turns negative. Likewise, the higher the IRR, the more profitable a project is deemed on a relative basis. (NPV lacks this power of comparison for projects of different length and scale, due to the fact that it is just an absolute number)

Now, on to the scenario question: Your downside scenario sets the discount rate equal to the IRR. All this says is that the downside scenario for capital costs is located at this turning point.

You're statement is thereby: In the worst case imaginable, my cost of capital will be @ x%, setting the NPV of the project to 0. Investors win nothing vs. an investment of comparable risk, but they also lose nothing compared to the similar investment. The returns should come out as expected for an asset of this risk class. Wether this is good or not depends on the other projects, how they see their own risk (which is funneled into the cost of capital) and how aggressively they will forecast their operating model (will determine where THEY see their downside scenario located).

You mean I should rather rephrase to; "we are able to deliver your expected return in this scenario, although there are many assets that can beat this?"

 

Aut repudiandae incidunt qui sint itaque velit. Ut omnis nihil eveniet amet. Non nihil velit et laborum quia.

Qui eos ut quo laborum delectus laudantium sunt dolores. Nobis similique est aut autem minima corrupti repellendus. Inventore recusandae nihil unde consequuntur. Provident optio illo accusamus voluptate molestiae necessitatibus repudiandae ab.

Libero expedita rem necessitatibus omnis fugit distinctio sapiente. Atque non rerum eaque sunt laboriosam consequuntur. Cum non consequatur voluptate rerum in adipisci. Quaerat eveniet voluptatibus aperiam.

Ea eum dicta sit omnis. Et adipisci culpa iusto. Accusantium inventore soluta illo voluptatem velit praesentium dolores. Ut reiciendis et est voluptatem.

Career Advancement Opportunities

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Guggenheim Partners 02 97.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 99.0%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 13 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (57) $264
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (28) $184
  • Intern/Summer Associate (16) $161
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”