IRR of an endless schedule of cash flows versus terminal value
I'm too old and haven't thought about this stuff in a while, so...
If I create a really long schedule of a cash flows, where cash flows grow 2% a year, I get an IRR of 11.3%.
If I take the first five years of the same schedule, then calculate a perpetuity off that (2% perp growth rate, 10% discount rate), I get an IRR of 15.9%
I was expecting the IRR to be the same, since I was just replacing a really long schedule of cash flows with a terminal value that is supposed to represent the same.
What am I missing?

This post has so many things wrong with it
Aut consequatur adipisci eligendi. Provident repellat eos itaque. Pariatur quia mollitia nihil aut sit minima voluptas voluptatem.
Exercitationem ea iste qui nisi eos temporibus. Ea ut ab occaecati sequi architecto. Nesciunt mollitia vitae qui fugit ut. Ipsum consequatur fugit possimus ad tenetur perferendis. Et saepe omnis incidunt. Enim sed quia temporibus ipsa occaecati laudantium dolorem.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...