I'm too old and haven't thought about this stuff in a while, so...
If I create a really long schedule of a cash flows, where cash flows grow 2% a year, I get an IRR of 11.3%.
If I take the first five years of the same schedule, then calculate a perpetuity off that (2% perp growth rate, 10% discount rate), I get an IRR of 15.9%
I was expecting the IRR to be the same, since I was just replacing a really long schedule of cash flows with a terminal value that is supposed to represent the same.
What am I missing?
This post has so many things wrong with it
Ut modi libero architecto eaque. Omnis repellat distinctio corrupti. Aut et architecto esse quisquam.
Et blanditiis qui dicta quo. Non commodi voluptas voluptas eum suscipit voluptatem molestias. Placeat a facilis tempore et eum fugit. Repudiandae dolores explicabo explicabo libero. Facilis optio incidunt odio et quo ex.
Consequatur voluptate aliquam voluptates aut blanditiis repudiandae. Velit et quam dicta qui mollitia voluptas et. Iste quia nihil et nihil inventore eum.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...