Is having a paid agency / paid career coach (Analyst, associate..) that are working full time in the bank count as cheating? (Leaked question bank etc.)

As titled, I was wondering whether this counts as cheating in banking recruitment. Friends in banks recently noticed that many interns came unprepared throughout the program. They seems to performed well in interviews, which makes sense as they paid for the question banks, but in practice they were not as sharp as they appeared. This was especially common among some Chinese student candidates (e.g. OSG). Is it possible to report this to HR or to senior staff?

7 Comments
 

I think cheating, having gotten a hold of interview questions (ie: someone sold it) and having a 'career coach', ie: mentor are two very, very different things. Just because someone does well in a process and craps the bed during the job, it doesn't mean there was some foul play involved, ethical or otherwise - it's a tale as old as time. 

 

Using paid agencies or career coaches to prepare for banking recruitment is not inherently considered cheating, as long as the services provided are ethical and do not involve violating recruitment policies. Many candidates use career coaches to refine their resumes, practice interviews, and improve their overall presentation. However, if these services include access to leaked question banks or proprietary materials from the hiring firm, this crosses the line into unethical behavior and could be considered cheating.

Key Points to Consider:

  1. Ethical Use of Career Coaches:

    • Career coaches are widely used in the industry to help candidates prepare for interviews and improve their skills. This is generally accepted as long as the preparation is based on publicly available resources and does not involve any form of dishonesty.
  2. Leaked Question Banks:

    • If candidates are using leaked question banks or proprietary materials from the hiring firm, this is a clear violation of ethical standards. It undermines the fairness of the recruitment process and could lead to serious consequences if discovered.
  3. Performance Discrepancy:

    • The issue you mentioned, where candidates perform well in interviews but struggle during the internship, could be a red flag. It might indicate over-reliance on external help or unethical preparation methods.
  4. Reporting Concerns:

    • If you have concrete evidence that candidates are using leaked materials or engaging in unethical practices, it may be worth reporting this to HR or senior staff. However, ensure that your claims are substantiated to avoid unnecessary accusations.
  5. Cultural Sensitivity:

    • Be cautious about generalizing behaviors to specific groups, such as Chinese students. Focus on the actions of individuals rather than attributing issues to a particular demographic.

Actionable Advice:

  • If you suspect unethical behavior, document any evidence you have before approaching HR or senior staff. Be professional and objective in your communication.
  • Encourage firms to enhance their recruitment processes by incorporating more practical assessments or case studies to evaluate candidates' real-world skills, reducing the reliance on interview performance alone.

Ultimately, the goal should be to maintain a fair and transparent recruitment process while addressing any concerns in a constructive manner.

Sources: Bank withdrawing signed/accepted offer?, My Issues with Diversity Recruiting in Finance, A friend of mine cheated and got an Internship offer at a BB IB, Are career coaches worth it?

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

Minima rerum et et vel magnam voluptatem. Placeat libero aut nobis et molestiae consequatur qui. Et aut et quo magnam. Voluptatem ea nostrum dolorem maxime et aut dolores.

 

Et quo doloribus optio quibusdam nihil itaque corrupti. Corrupti nulla repellat eum dignissimos. Eius dignissimos ad sequi amet neque ut eaque. Necessitatibus optio dolorem voluptatum doloribus. Sed a voluptas impedit officia id qui tempore. Pariatur id quia deleniti eligendi. Magnam necessitatibus praesentium magnam consequuntur qui ipsum.

Est voluptatem omnis quaerat sit natus molestiae. Sit ducimus fuga quasi. Eos nemo quod est qui nesciunt est et maiores. Quod minima labore quasi dolore. Qui nobis ab maiores occaecati sed. Esse libero labore sed libero vel veniam unde natus.

Earum quam voluptates nulla est. Iusto ipsum rem qui ut repellendus velit et. Nam quia autem consequatur nam accusamus at aut.

[Comment removed by mod team]

Career Advancement Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.9%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.3%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.9%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.3%

Professional Growth Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.3%

Total Avg Compensation

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (53) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (28) $184
  • Intern/Summer Associate (15) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”