Lazard CL Integration

How is this integration of platforms going to position Lazard in PCA? Will this position Lazard behind Evercore, and is there any chance another firm can outcompete Evercore in PCA? What do you think are the potential risks associated with the integration? Do you think there will be other firms that make similar acquisitions as the LAZ CL?

Also, I am curious what the current state of PCA Is and what the biggest players are, especially with this integration, and other firms like Moelis and BBs beginning to invest in their PCA teams.

5 Comments
 

Lazard's integration of Campbell Lutyens (CL) into its platform is a strategic move aimed at strengthening its position in the Private Capital Advisory (PCA) market. Here's a breakdown of your questions based on the most helpful WSO content:

Lazard's Position Post-Integration

  • Position Relative to Evercore: Lazard is currently considered a Tier 2 player in PCA, trailing behind Tier 1 firms like Evercore, Jefferies, and Goldman Sachs. The integration of CL could help Lazard address some of its staffing issues and focus more on GP-led transactions, but it is unlikely to immediately elevate Lazard to Tier 1 status. Evercore remains the highest-volume group in PCA, though its quality is noted to be slightly behind Jefferies and Goldman Sachs.
  • Potential for Other Firms to Outcompete Evercore: While Evercore dominates in volume, Jefferies and Goldman Sachs are strong competitors, with Jefferies being the "brand name" in the business and Goldman having the strongest sponsor coverage and execution capabilities. These firms are better positioned to challenge Evercore than Lazard, even with the CL integration.

Risks Associated with the Integration

  1. Cultural and Operational Challenges: Integrating two platforms with potentially different cultures and operational styles could lead to inefficiencies or conflicts.
  2. Execution Risk: Successfully leveraging CL's expertise and deal flow to enhance Lazard's PCA capabilities will require careful execution.
  3. Market Perception: If the integration is not seamless, it could reinforce Lazard's Tier 2 status rather than elevate it.

Likelihood of Similar Acquisitions

  • Other firms, particularly those in Tier 2 or Tier 3, may consider acquisitions to bolster their PCA capabilities. However, such moves would depend on the availability of suitable targets and the strategic priorities of the acquiring firms.

Current State of PCA and Biggest Players

  • Tier 1 Players:
    • Evercore: Highest volume group, though quality is slightly behind Jefferies and Goldman.
    • Goldman Sachs: A newer group with ex-Lazard professionals, known for strong sponsor coverage and execution.
    • Jefferies: The "brand name" in PCA, with a focus on GP stakes and LP baskets.
    • PJT Park Hill: Highly regarded but slightly behind Jefferies and Goldman in quality.
  • Tier 2 Players:
    • Campbell Lutyens (now part of Lazard): Strong deal flow but behind Tier 1 firms.
    • Lazard: A step behind Jefferies, Goldman, and Evercore, with a focus on GP-led transactions.
  • Tier 3 Players:
    • Firms like Afidity and M20, which are smaller but offer decent quality.

Other Firms Investing in PCA

  • Moelis and some bulge brackets (BBs) are beginning to invest in their PCA teams, signaling growing interest in this space. However, these efforts are still in the early stages and may take time to yield significant results.

In summary, while Lazard's integration of CL is a positive step, it is unlikely to immediately position the firm as a Tier 1 player. The PCA market remains competitive, with Evercore, Jefferies, and Goldman Sachs leading the pack. Other firms may follow Lazard's example with similar acquisitions, but execution and market dynamics will ultimately determine their success.

Sources: Best PCA/Secondary Advisory Groups, Tier 1 PCA/Secondary Advisory, PWP LA, Lazard LA, and Houlihan LA (RX), PWP LA vs Lazard LA

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

WSO Monkey Bot:

Lazard's integration of Campbell Lutyens (CL) into its platform is a strategic move aimed at strengthening its position in the Private Capital Advisory (PCA) market. Here's a breakdown of your questions based on the most helpful WSO content:



Lazard's Position Post-Integration




  • Position Relative to Evercore: Lazard is currently considered a Tier 2 player in PCA, trailing behind Tier 1 firms like Evercore, Jefferies, and Goldman Sachs. The integration of CL could help Lazard address some of its staffing issues and focus more on GP-led transactions, but it is unlikely to immediately elevate Lazard to Tier 1 status. Evercore remains the highest-volume group in PCA, though its quality is noted to be slightly behind Jefferies and Goldman Sachs.

  • Potential for Other Firms to Outcompete Evercore: While Evercore dominates in volume, Jefferies and Goldman Sachs are strong competitors, with Jefferies being the "brand name" in the business and Goldman having the strongest sponsor coverage and execution capabilities. These firms are better positioned to challenge Evercore than Lazard, even with the CL integration.



Risks Associated with the Integration




  1. Cultural and Operational Challenges: Integrating two platforms with potentially different cultures and operational styles could lead to inefficiencies or conflicts.

  2. Execution Risk: Successfully leveraging CL's expertise and deal flow to enhance Lazard's PCA capabilities will require careful execution.

  3. Market Perception: If the integration is not seamless, it could reinforce Lazard's Tier 2 status rather than elevate it.



Likelihood of Similar Acquisitions




  • Other firms, particularly those in Tier 2 or Tier 3, may consider acquisitions to bolster their PCA capabilities. However, such moves would depend on the availability of suitable targets and the strategic priorities of the acquiring firms.



Current State of PCA and Biggest Players




  • Tier 1 Players:


    • Evercore: Highest volume group, though quality is slightly behind Jefferies and Goldman.

    • Goldman Sachs: A newer group with ex-Lazard professionals, known for strong sponsor coverage and execution.

    • Jefferies: The "brand name" in PCA, with a focus on GP stakes and LP baskets.

    • PJT Park Hill: Highly regarded but slightly behind Jefferies and Goldman in quality.


  • Tier 2 Players:


    • Campbell Lutyens (now part of Lazard): Strong deal flow but behind Tier 1 firms.

    • Lazard: A step behind Jefferies, Goldman, and Evercore, with a focus on GP-led transactions.


  • Tier 3 Players:


    • Firms like Afidity and M20, which are smaller but offer decent quality.




Other Firms Investing in PCA




  • Moelis and some bulge brackets (BBs) are beginning to invest in their PCA teams, signaling growing interest in this space. However, these efforts are still in the early stages and may take time to yield significant results.



In summary, while Lazard's integration of CL is a positive step, it is unlikely to immediately position the firm as a Tier 1 player. The PCA market remains competitive, with Evercore, Jefferies, and Goldman Sachs leading the pack. Other firms may follow Lazard's example with similar acquisitions, but execution and market dynamics will ultimately determine their success.

Sources:
Best PCA/Secondary Advisory Groups, Tier 1 PCA/Secondary Advisory, PWP LA, Lazard LA, and Houlihan LA (RX), PWP LA vs Lazard LA

This is totally off. In Secondaries PCA Goldman Sachs is barely a player - their team is super unstable and barely does deals. The Lazard CL combination will mean no.1 advisor in Europe (CL currently is no.2/3 across GP + LP leds) and no2/3 advisor in the US.

 

I was surprised by the deal. Just seems like there is so much overlap between LAZ's existing platform and what CL has to offer. Is that really going to help them? 

 
Most Helpful

There actually wasn’t much overlap. LAZ historically much stronger on the US GP-led side and CL in Europe and LP-led. CL was also bigger on the cred and infra side where LAZ wasn’t present. Both pretty big in primaries, LAZ probably a bit stronger.

It’s pretty complimentary imo but 250 is a ton of bankers. Have to image in there’s some culling / departure coming out of it regardless.

 

Fuga quis sit assumenda neque sapiente tempora. Ducimus quae culpa rerum qui. Facere aperiam qui labore rerum placeat soluta.

Career Advancement Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.3%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 03 98.9%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.3%

Professional Growth Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.3%

Total Avg Compensation

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (53) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (28) $184
  • Intern/Summer Associate (15) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”