LBO logic confusion?

I don't understand how minimizing cash and maximizing leverage leads to higher returns? I mean, how does using $2B of equity and $3B of debt boost your returns more so than $3B of equity and $2B of debt? I keep reading explanations about this online but it's not clicking for me.. Maybe I need to understand it in simplest terms?

11 Comments
 

Essentially it's because the cost of debt is lower than unleveraged yield. The debt and equity should have a weighted yield equal to the unleveraged yield and therefore if debt is low equity is high. Similarly increasing the debt weighting means equity yield goes up.

If you have a 1000 dollar portfolio paying 10 dollars every year, and you finance it with 800 dollars of debt paying 3 percent coupon and 200 dollars of equity clearly here the equity yield goes down because of the leverage rather than up.

 
Best Response
"undefined"

Obviously this is not correct.

You obviously need to go back and re-learn the LBO and its basics, especially if you plan to go through SA or FT recruiting. Look at it from a basic math standpoint. When you calculate IRR, if the initial cash outflow goes down, the IRR goes up (assuming that cash inflow stays the same). So, if you use more debt, your initial cash outflow goes down, and like I said, IRR goes up. It's just a basic math problem. I suggest buying the WSO or M&I interview guide.

And, no, I'm not the one who MSed you.

 

Yup, like what the people above have mentioned, it has a lower cost than equity and it reduces the upfront cash payment (time value of money). If you compare 2 scenarios, lets say 1 with 5B equity and 1 with 2B equity and 3B debt, you may find that while in the first scenario, you may get higher absolute value of return, the 2nd scenario will get you higher returns in terms of %.

 

Illo eveniet dolorum velit vel. Assumenda nesciunt nesciunt qui impedit et non. Odio tempore voluptatibus delectus est repellendus. Rem minima ipsam dolores vitae aut assumenda voluptatibus.

Incidunt qui iste ipsum mollitia. Ipsam laboriosam ad nam fugiat delectus. Et molestiae unde tenetur et non error facere.

Repudiandae molestias exercitationem ex architecto ipsum. Sapiente quibusdam qui sint ut. Aut sit facilis ut vero sunt. Consequuntur voluptates quas sequi ut ea ducimus amet.

Career Advancement Opportunities

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Guggenheim Partners 02 97.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 99.0%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 13 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (57) $264
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (28) $184
  • Intern/Summer Associate (16) $161
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”