I don't understand how minimizing cash and maximizing leverage leads to higher returns? I mean, how does using $2B of equity and $3B of debt boost your returns more so than $3B of equity and $2B of debt? I keep reading explanations about this online but it's not clicking for me.. Maybe I need to understand it in simplest terms?
| +220 | UBS Accused of Favoring H-1B Workers While Cutting U.S.-Born Employees | 51 | 20h |
| +114 | ONLY THESE BANKS OR YOU STRUCK OUT | 33 | 5h |
| +110 | IB Energy Drink Tier List / Ranking | 72 | 1d |
| +91 | PJT M&A Group Selection 2026 | 14 | 1d |
| +55 | Firm Thinks I'm Lying About Offer | 18 | 17h |
| +51 | Feedback for internship first desk at IBD BB - personal fit, "don't be too confident" | 29 | 1d |
| +33 | Stay at Weak Dealflow Team or Lateral? | 10 | 2h |
| +30 | Does BofA still pay its associates rat pellets? | 15 | 1d |
| +30 | Indiana University Fraternity Pipelines | 15 | 1h |
| +28 | Rogo AI | 8 | 40m |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
Essentially it's because the cost of debt is lower than unleveraged yield. The debt and equity should have a weighted yield equal to the unleveraged yield and therefore if debt is low equity is high. Similarly increasing the debt weighting means equity yield goes up.
If you have a 1000 dollar portfolio paying 10 dollars every year, and you finance it with 800 dollars of debt paying 3 percent coupon and 200 dollars of equity clearly here the equity yield goes down because of the leverage rather than up.
Simply put, it is because your cash outflow is less. When calculating IRR, the lower the cash outflow, the higher the IRR. So, if the purchase price is the same, lowering your percent of equity (cash) raises your IRR.
Obviously this is not correct.
You obviously need to go back and re-learn the LBO and its basics, especially if you plan to go through SA or FT recruiting. Look at it from a basic math standpoint. When you calculate IRR, if the initial cash outflow goes down, the IRR goes up (assuming that cash inflow stays the same). So, if you use more debt, your initial cash outflow goes down, and like I said, IRR goes up. It's just a basic math problem. I suggest buying the WSO or M&I interview guide.
And, no, I'm not the one who MSed you.
Yup, like what the people above have mentioned, it has a lower cost than equity and it reduces the upfront cash payment (time value of money). If you compare 2 scenarios, lets say 1 with 5B equity and 1 with 2B equity and 3B debt, you may find that while in the first scenario, you may get higher absolute value of return, the 2nd scenario will get you higher returns in terms of %.
Laborum nulla recusandae temporibus est. Assumenda excepturi aut asperiores est molestiae. Autem voluptatem repellat suscipit ab cumque nam. Consequatur aliquid qui est unde dicta rerum non. Totam ratione omnis esse placeat ut.
Sit animi suscipit a quo incidunt perferendis vel. Aut fugit doloremque necessitatibus voluptas sunt consequatur sunt. Sit officiis sint consequatur quia quasi nesciunt aperiam. Assumenda enim provident quia repellendus facere et. In qui voluptates molestiae dignissimos aliquam vero dolorem.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...