Lev Fin taking over PC

Wondering how people in the PC and Lev Fin felt about OCC and FDIC Rescind Interagency Leveraged Lending Guidance. It is about two months into this rule, how is it going change the competition between private versus bank lenders on deals, especially its now an issuer's markets. Welcome any thoughts! 

(ignore title, just for click bait)

4 Comments
 

The rescinding of the Interagency Leveraged Lending Guidance by the OCC and FDIC could have significant implications for the competition between private lenders and banks in the leveraged finance (LevFin) space. Here's a breakdown based on the most helpful WSO content:

  1. Impact on Banks:

    • Banks have traditionally been more constrained by regulatory requirements, such as capital requirements and risk restrictions, which limited their ability to take on riskier leveraged loans. With the removal of this guidance, banks may now have more flexibility to compete in the leveraged lending market, potentially increasing their appetite for riskier deals.
    • However, banks still face other regulatory pressures and balance sheet considerations, which means they may not fully match the risk tolerance of private lenders.
  2. Private Lenders' Position:

    • Private credit and direct lending funds have thrived in the middle-market and riskier segments of the lending space, where banks were previously restricted. These lenders raise funds from investors who expect higher returns, allowing them to take on more risk compared to banks.
    • Even with the regulatory changes, private lenders may maintain their competitive edge in riskier or more bespoke deals, as they are not bound by the same balance sheet constraints as banks.
  3. Issuer's Market Dynamics:

    • In an issuer's market, where borrowers have more leverage, the increased competition from banks could lead to tighter spreads and more favorable terms for borrowers. This could pressure private lenders to adjust their pricing or terms to remain competitive.
    • However, private lenders often differentiate themselves through speed, flexibility, and the ability to structure complex deals, which could help them retain their market share despite increased competition.
  4. Long-Term Outlook:

    • While the rescinding of the guidance may level the playing field to some extent, the fundamental differences in capital sources and risk appetites between banks and private lenders will likely continue to shape the competitive landscape. Banks may regain some ground in the leveraged lending space, but private lenders are expected to remain strong players, particularly in the middle-market and higher-risk segments.

In summary, the regulatory change could increase competition between banks and private lenders, especially in the leveraged finance space. However, private lenders' ability to take on more risk and offer tailored solutions will likely keep them competitive, even as banks become more aggressive.

Sources: Private Credit / Direct Lending Comp, Private Credit / Direct Lending Comp, Alternative Lenders & the End of Risk Taking for Banks - Opportunity or Risk?

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

Unde quam optio qui quasi eum eveniet dolore. Illum sint aut inventore dolor a. Eum molestiae itaque eaque molestiae hic officiis.

Et et id repudiandae rerum et tenetur quaerat. Et illo sit nulla maiores dolorem voluptas asperiores.

Voluptas veniam officiis explicabo qui. Quia sed cupiditate dolor exercitationem. Voluptas quo reprehenderit quia eos excepturi consectetur. Maxime et minima libero ut ducimus. Qui eum molestiae et optio voluptas iste debitis.

Career Advancement Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 08 97.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.2%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.8%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.2%

Professional Growth Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.2%

Total Avg Compensation

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (48) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (25) $178
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (83) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (75) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”