Lev Fin taking over PC

Wondering how people in the PC and Lev Fin felt about OCC and FDIC Rescind Interagency Leveraged Lending Guidance. It is about two months into this rule, how is it going change the competition between private versus bank lenders on deals, especially its now an issuer's markets. Welcome any thoughts! 

(ignore title, just for click bait)

4 Comments
 

The rescinding of the Interagency Leveraged Lending Guidance by the OCC and FDIC could have significant implications for the competition between private lenders and banks in the leveraged finance (LevFin) space. Here's a breakdown based on the most helpful WSO content:

  1. Impact on Banks:

    • Banks have traditionally been more constrained by regulatory requirements, such as capital requirements and risk restrictions, which limited their ability to take on riskier leveraged loans. With the removal of this guidance, banks may now have more flexibility to compete in the leveraged lending market, potentially increasing their appetite for riskier deals.
    • However, banks still face other regulatory pressures and balance sheet considerations, which means they may not fully match the risk tolerance of private lenders.
  2. Private Lenders' Position:

    • Private credit and direct lending funds have thrived in the middle-market and riskier segments of the lending space, where banks were previously restricted. These lenders raise funds from investors who expect higher returns, allowing them to take on more risk compared to banks.
    • Even with the regulatory changes, private lenders may maintain their competitive edge in riskier or more bespoke deals, as they are not bound by the same balance sheet constraints as banks.
  3. Issuer's Market Dynamics:

    • In an issuer's market, where borrowers have more leverage, the increased competition from banks could lead to tighter spreads and more favorable terms for borrowers. This could pressure private lenders to adjust their pricing or terms to remain competitive.
    • However, private lenders often differentiate themselves through speed, flexibility, and the ability to structure complex deals, which could help them retain their market share despite increased competition.
  4. Long-Term Outlook:

    • While the rescinding of the guidance may level the playing field to some extent, the fundamental differences in capital sources and risk appetites between banks and private lenders will likely continue to shape the competitive landscape. Banks may regain some ground in the leveraged lending space, but private lenders are expected to remain strong players, particularly in the middle-market and higher-risk segments.

In summary, the regulatory change could increase competition between banks and private lenders, especially in the leveraged finance space. However, private lenders' ability to take on more risk and offer tailored solutions will likely keep them competitive, even as banks become more aggressive.

Sources: Private Credit / Direct Lending Comp, Private Credit / Direct Lending Comp, Alternative Lenders & the End of Risk Taking for Banks - Opportunity or Risk?

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

PC can get money quicker to market. Most bank financing is syndicated and takes longer. Yes banks will be slightly more competitive but I’ve never been on a deal where my bank takes down the whole thing.

PC still has the advantage in the LMM/MM space + more flexibility with terms

 

Magni distinctio quia neque autem numquam quia. Voluptate non sit quis sequi. Veritatis beatae magni ut temporibus totam.

Rerum nesciunt accusamus et vel dolores rerum. Atque debitis quisquam aut ut. Dolore id maiores assumenda esse. Fugit dolorem veniam impedit aliquid. Unde eligendi quo quam inventore enim. Fugit ipsa quibusdam rerum itaque dolorum.

Eos fuga nemo et sit perferendis. Sunt consequatur est aspernatur fugit. Ipsa accusantium aliquam aspernatur eum consequuntur quis. Error ut esse et dolores est.

Consectetur vel culpa ut sed. Quasi doloremque debitis error illum occaecati aliquid. Quasi qui enim iste est voluptatem expedita. Nemo expedita ipsam iusto voluptates. Error magni impedit expedita perferendis.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (67) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
9
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”