Levered beta represents systematic risk of a company in relation to the market, but given levered beta accounts for capital structure, is that not unsystematic risk?
I was always told levered beta does not represent unsystematic risk.
| +164 | Investment Banks Ranked By Your Divorced Blue Collared Uncle | 17 | 8m |
| +156 | Think Twice before Recruiting for HOUSTON IB!! | 65 | 2d |
| +136 | UBS Exits 2026 | 37 | 7h |
| +57 | Congrats on the ROs. I Still Don’t Know Which One You Were | 8 | 5h |
| +40 | Mid-Level UBS Departure for another BB (Grass Isn’t Greener…) | 31 | 3d |
| +39 | Did not get a return offer due to headcount, but happy to move on. | 8 | 16h |
| +37 | IB RO Discussion | 6 | 3d |
| +32 | GS - Low Bonus | 23 | 22h |
| +29 | Lied about bonus to future employer | 16 | 4h |
| +28 | Early VP promo timeline | 15 | 1d |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
Think about it this way (and someone please correct me when I’m wrong) - what is beta? Beta is the output of a regression between a specific security (in this case a company’s stock price) and a broad idea of a market portfolio (most people use the S&P as a proxy but in theory it should include the returns on everything). Therefore, both levered and unlevered beta represent systematic risk (it’s the regression output between your returns and the market portfolio) but they differ on whether they include the effects of debt on said systematic risk. The more levered you are the more exposed you are to swings on the market. As such, we choose to unlever beta for companies across an industry to standardize the level of systematic risk to ignore the capital structure effects of debt (mainly because you can choose the level of debt your company has) and then re-lever it at your company’s capital structure. You can still run a DCF with either but the immediate output you get represent different things. So I guess to summarize, both are measures of systematic risk but they either include or exclude the effects of debt.
Tempora quae facere impedit culpa. Laudantium praesentium eos quis et qui necessitatibus. Porro a fuga consequatur dolores et.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...