Levered beta represents systematic risk of a company in relation to the market, but given levered beta accounts for capital structure, is that not unsystematic risk?
I was always told levered beta does not represent unsystematic risk.
| +186 | UBS Accused of Favoring H-1B Workers While Cutting U.S.-Born Employees | 46 | 4h |
| +83 | IB Energy Drink Tier List / Ranking | 57 | 5h |
| +76 | PJT M&A Group Selection 2026 | 13 | 17h |
| +55 | ONLY THESE BANKS OR YOU STRUCK OUT | 15 | 3m |
| +36 | Quick Thoughts on CVC AI Sale Process | 7 | 3d |
| +34 | Feedback for internship first desk at IBD BB - personal fit, "don't be too confident" | 23 | 1d |
| +28 | Does BofA still pay its associates rat pellets? | 14 | 7h |
| +18 | What happened to Greenhill | 8 | 3d |
| +18 | Updated JPM Group Rankings | 30 | 8h |
| +18 | VP Deal Origination Credit | 2 | 15h |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
Think about it this way (and someone please correct me when I’m wrong) - what is beta? Beta is the output of a regression between a specific security (in this case a company’s stock price) and a broad idea of a market portfolio (most people use the S&P as a proxy but in theory it should include the returns on everything). Therefore, both levered and unlevered beta represent systematic risk (it’s the regression output between your returns and the market portfolio) but they differ on whether they include the effects of debt on said systematic risk. The more levered you are the more exposed you are to swings on the market. As such, we choose to unlever beta for companies across an industry to standardize the level of systematic risk to ignore the capital structure effects of debt (mainly because you can choose the level of debt your company has) and then re-lever it at your company’s capital structure. You can still run a DCF with either but the immediate output you get represent different things. So I guess to summarize, both are measures of systematic risk but they either include or exclude the effects of debt.
Modi quaerat illo sit modi consectetur in consequatur soluta. Repellat aliquam at eaque molestiae et sed. Et eos id nisi tempora a voluptas. Facere sit nisi enim dicta quas quidem. Quaerat ratione voluptatem assumenda consequuntur voluptas cum fugiat.
Nihil sunt aliquid numquam libero molestiae explicabo. Nesciunt quod qui inventore vel itaque vero est quo. Officiis fugiat qui et laudantium quaerat placeat cupiditate. Nihil sunt enim repudiandae beatae sequi non voluptate.
Ut quo molestiae eius perspiciatis dolor et ipsam. Sunt est quas ad non. Vero blanditiis ducimus minus veritatis atque eos sed. Assumenda quis consequatur ut consequatur maiores doloribus voluptatibus. Architecto a consectetur aperiam harum fuga ut autem. Laboriosam ratione libero velit enim. Nemo sit sit sapiente.
Enim nobis voluptates quia fuga vel eos possimus. Nam animi voluptatem sed. Velit aperiam modi nisi perspiciatis autem. Quia tenetur illum quis et quasi voluptas voluptatibus. Dolorem provident quam excepturi repudiandae accusamus.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...