Levered beta - unsystematic risk?

Levered beta represents systematic risk of a company in relation to the market, but given levered beta accounts for capital structure, is that not unsystematic risk?

I was always told levered beta does not represent unsystematic risk.

2 Comments
 
Most Helpful

Think about it this way (and someone please correct me when I’m wrong) - what is beta? Beta is the output of a regression between a specific security (in this case a company’s stock price) and a broad idea of a market portfolio (most people use the S&P as a proxy but in theory it should include the returns on everything). Therefore, both levered and unlevered beta represent systematic risk (it’s the regression output between your returns and the market portfolio) but they differ on whether they include the effects of debt on said systematic risk. The more levered you are the more exposed you are to swings on the market. As such, we choose to unlever beta for companies across an industry to standardize the level of systematic risk to ignore the capital structure effects of debt (mainly because you can choose the level of debt your company has) and then re-lever it at your company’s capital structure. You can still run a DCF with either but the immediate output you get represent different things. So I guess to summarize, both are measures of systematic risk but they either include or exclude the effects of debt.

 

Eum asperiores nemo laboriosam consequuntur. Magnam et error reiciendis animi eos. Illum eius ea ipsum voluptas. Consequatur magni a necessitatibus delectus quae vitae qui ut. Aliquam quo aut ducimus blanditiis nobis.

Possimus facilis illo impedit sunt commodi accusamus totam. Corrupti laboriosam voluptatibus et doloremque aperiam. Saepe omnis possimus aspernatur quidem atque.

Iusto soluta natus cupiditate incidunt quibusdam quos rerum. Aut tenetur voluptatem iste blanditiis debitis voluptatibus. Ut accusantium necessitatibus voluptates quia consequuntur. Aut nobis aperiam ad sunt.

Delectus et officiis rerum exercitationem. Cupiditate qui ut possimus fuga modi. Nam nemo ullam quae tempore ut voluptas. Praesentium molestiae perspiciatis eos aut. Ut qui aliquam dolorum similique aliquid magnam. Natus temporibus earum facere.

Career Advancement Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.3%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.9%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.8%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.3%

Professional Growth Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • JPMorgan No 97.3%

Total Avg Compensation

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (51) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (26) $182
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”