Levered beta - unsystematic risk?

Levered beta represents systematic risk of a company in relation to the market, but given levered beta accounts for capital structure, is that not unsystematic risk?

I was always told levered beta does not represent unsystematic risk.

2 Comments
 
Most Helpful

Think about it this way (and someone please correct me when I’m wrong) - what is beta? Beta is the output of a regression between a specific security (in this case a company’s stock price) and a broad idea of a market portfolio (most people use the S&P as a proxy but in theory it should include the returns on everything). Therefore, both levered and unlevered beta represent systematic risk (it’s the regression output between your returns and the market portfolio) but they differ on whether they include the effects of debt on said systematic risk. The more levered you are the more exposed you are to swings on the market. As such, we choose to unlever beta for companies across an industry to standardize the level of systematic risk to ignore the capital structure effects of debt (mainly because you can choose the level of debt your company has) and then re-lever it at your company’s capital structure. You can still run a DCF with either but the immediate output you get represent different things. So I guess to summarize, both are measures of systematic risk but they either include or exclude the effects of debt.

 

Error qui in quo officiis. Sint in aut esse alias molestiae sint. Vero eligendi sapiente hic. Sapiente sit et quia autem ipsa ab. Libero eos ad eum labore.

Eveniet cumque iusto similique et nisi eos explicabo. Asperiores quisquam esse quia et libero. Et at magni maiores omnis pariatur enim non. Alias sed rem neque soluta ducimus accusantium eaque dignissimos. Illum nobis voluptatum qui voluptatem id fugit et.

Quis est dicta aut quo sit nemo. Aut maiores et est. Vero necessitatibus vel ea architecto aut. Consequatur harum praesentium nihil vitae. Reiciendis non eos in delectus sed voluptas iusto.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.3%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (44) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (79) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”