Logical Question *Hard*
Anyone has an idea which one is correct and why?
Anyone has an idea which one is correct and why?
| +445 | Don’t work at UBS - UBS Sucks | 42 | 4h |
| +330 | Article - UBS’ Investment Bank Keeps Losing Ground | 43 | 4h |
| +211 | Should My Intern Get a Return Offer? | 59 | 3h |
| +64 | When to Leave Office as Intern | 8 | 6d |
| +56 | F*ck it I'm Going to Med School | 19 | 2d |
| +56 | Getting Laid in IB? | 28 | 6h |
| +49 | Would you rather be a Touse Squid or a Bouse Mogger in IB | 3 | 18h |
| +45 | Living in greenwich as an analyst? | 9 | 9h |
| +32 | STEM student lost in London IB recruiting | 19 | 15h |
| +27 | NYC Associate Budget | 9 | 1d |
Career Resources
Its A. One triangle moves, while the other stays in place for the following sequence. They move diagonally. I may be wrong though.
i think i thought of something similar but i dont quite understand what you want to say
if we marked all 9 small triangles from top to bottom with numbers 1 234 56789
how would the movement go?
i found several logics, but i cant figure out number 7 somehow..
I just don't think A is the answer... it doesn't explain number 7
i found a logic for E too, but it might be flawed...
no idea with this one, i thought its something obvious and that i just cant see it atm
Accusantium odio aspernatur recusandae dolores ullam facere. Consequatur non et laboriosam autem voluptatibus. Eum qui quo quisquam porro. Perspiciatis consectetur eligendi ut reiciendis ex.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...