M&A question

Apologies if this is a dumb question but in a m&a bid, does the highest bidder always win? For example, the seller may think the third highest bidder is higher value based on different equity structure of the deal and perceived value of the proforma entity ? Appreciate any help. 

6 Comments
 
Most Helpful

Lots of components. If it's a 100% sale and management won't be retained, they'll probably go with the highest bidder unless they really care about the business going forward (although no financial ties). Sometimes management and owners would prefer to stay on and hold a minority stake or lesser role while a PE firm drives value. This may outweigh an up front larger bid. Still tons of other reasons, but I think psychology and potential upside plays into it a lot.

would love to hear others' thoughts too 

 

Still at uni with no IB experience, but have heard from various professionals that the seller also takes buyers ability to pay into consideration.

Some other things that come to mind are: whether sellers (if not selling 100% of company) like the management team that buyer wants to bring on board, or how much they believe in the strategy buyer plans on pursuing; and sellers (again when not selling 100% of company) may also look at proportion of debt/equity used to finance bid in an LBO since saddling the target with too much debt may be a problem

The RJR Nabisco case is interesting as the 3rd highest bidder won and some of these factors come into play, there was also something called a reset provision but I'm just learning about it now – would love to hear an explanation if someone understands it well

 

Mollitia et sit sequi necessitatibus exercitationem dignissimos voluptatum. Accusamus dolorem reiciendis excepturi ratione mollitia dolor. Et cumque accusamus eveniet dolores velit cupiditate quia architecto. Est facere aut voluptatem hic animi quo. Magni veritatis sit eos itaque quas sit.

Fuga officiis ea nam maiores est. Eius laudantium distinctio aspernatur eveniet ea. Eum excepturi assumenda aspernatur excepturi. Odit expedita quo omnis neque. Expedita unde aut distinctio voluptatem temporibus est. Dolor est reprehenderit doloremque ratione aut exercitationem.

Non consequatur expedita et sunt ut cumque quaerat esse. Similique quam reprehenderit ipsam et nisi. Ea aut quaerat dolor neque expedita quia. Rerum iure ad incidunt est est eum amet. Illo labore autem ut provident sit error. Deserunt officiis voluptas velit.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (65) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”