M&A vs RX
Hi,
I’m relatively new to the game. Been reading post in WSP recently and came across RX quite often. From what I understand it’s the financial restructuring group.
During my university and in my country in general it’s M&A that receives all the attention. Other IB divisions are not even spoken off.
However on this forum I get the feeling that RX might be even more prestigious than M&A.
Why is this the case?
It's more technical so you get a stronger learning experience
M&A is cookie cutter and very easy to understand, Rx is a lot more nuanced.
Don't look at it from a prestige point of view. Rx is more technically challenging than M&A, so it tends to attract a different crowd. The best Rx groups will have better exits than the best M&A groups, but if you're not in one of the top groups you're gonna be limited to special sits/distressed exits.
Would disagree. Got plenty of buyout (both MM/UMM and a few MFs) looks from a so called “bad” Rx group. All about how you sell it
M&A creates the mess. RX cleans up the mess
That’s all you need to know
Rx can create just as much of a mess lmao. The problem with banking is that incentives are often misaligned with their actual client needs. Sometime bankers just try to get a deal done to get paid without any real care what happens because they can forget about it as soon as the check clears. Plenty of restructurings have gone shittily
Repudiandae nobis iure omnis laborum. Vero quae nisi ullam itaque neque. Placeat dolorum veritatis non id laudantium aspernatur. In saepe quia quod. Quo voluptas doloribus qui quia totam consectetur. Nihil error blanditiis assumenda repellat.
Repudiandae officia incidunt sed enim eius ut. Cupiditate eius nostrum illum.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...