Margins vs. ROA/ROCE

If you are to sit down and look at a company with razor-thin EBIT margins (lets say 2%) but great ROCE numbers (lets say 25%), I'm struggling a bit to figure out, what does that tell you about the quality/profitability of the underlying business?

I mean, clearly it tells you that its not an asset-intensive business, but from the standpoint of attractiveness of the business model - would the industry described above be the kind of industry you want to be invested in?

Curious to see if anyone has some smart ideas on this

Thanks

2 Comments
 
Best Response

In very broad terms you're asking if a company with tiny profit margins but with virtually no assets required to generate those profits is an attractive business model and the answer is it really depends. You can't really answer that without a whole bunch of qualifiers - so here goes: I'm assuming you're referring to return on capital employed (EBIT/fixed assets-current liabilities) as opposed to return on common equity (if it is the latter, then the explanation could just be that the business is very highlighy levered).

Ok, so assuming you are talking about return on capital employed, one example of what you're describing is the supermarket industry - they have razor thin margins and surprisingly decent ROCEs - (especially those that use operating leases because most of their fixed assets are off the balance sheet). Which is part of the issue - the "real" ROCE is actually much lower. Some companies showing high ROCE may really be have lower "real" ROCE because their intangible assets, leases, and other assets are left off the book value calculation.

Software companies that are starting up, depending on whether their intangible assets and cash are included in ROCE may also show this kind of dynamic for a short period of time (it should be included, but if it isn't, then, voilà , high ROCE). Also, banks could show this relationship if you leave our the loan portfolio from the ROCE definition (although again, this becomes a fairly meaningless exercise if you take out the loan portfolio).

Hope this helps

Matan Feldman Founder, Wall Street Prep Learn Financial Modeling
 

Similique praesentium omnis quae rerum sed. Ducimus quis facere voluptate beatae doloribus sit iure. Est sed itaque quas consequatur nihil delectus. Fuga illum qui et dolor ex rerum quasi.

Rem incidunt impedit et distinctio animi. Architecto temporibus delectus expedita est sit in rerum. Quisquam laudantium optio quibusdam a et. Est et et incidunt quasi beatae. Atque amet delectus voluptas doloremque. Numquam velit rerum ut possimus.

Career Advancement Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 08 97.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.2%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.8%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.2%

Professional Growth Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.2%

Total Avg Compensation

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (48) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (25) $178
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (83) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (75) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”