MBB PE Consulting vs IB Exits
Currently have an offer from a top MM in the US (Jeff, Greenhill, DB), but thinking about consulting.
I’ve heard exits from MBB PE DD groups are comparable to the exits I might have now. My uncles an MD at one of the firms, so let’s assume I have a guaranteed spot in one of the PE teams.
How would my exit chances stack up for PE/HF/buy-side for both? Seems like a no brainer if they’re similar (fewer hours, better culture), but I’ve never seen a direct comparison of exits for PE DD specifically
I can only speak for MBB Europe. If you are a hardo and set on doing PE, you will get good exits from MBB. The distinction though is being a hardo. Don't expect to just fall into a PE offer.
I saw tons of my friends go to the likes of GA, Advent, BainCap, Nordic, Permira even few KKRs. All of them were ridiculously driven/set on doing PE and very sharp.
Hence I don't really get the math when people say IB always >>> MBB for PE exits. For sure much easier to recruit out of a GS/JPM/MS and selective EBs. But below that? Not so sure.
Tons of my uni friends also started out at the likes of BofA, UBS, HL, Jeff, etc. - all good banks in and by themselves, but actually saw none of them exiting to a LC fund recently.
I only can imagine that it is incredibly tough to place as a banker if you are up against the GS/JPM/MS of the world for your spot. As a consultant the funds who hire consultants typically ringfence the process, i.e., you won't be up against a banker but only other consultants.
Can certainly also imagine that there is a mid to longterm tailwind for consultant hires in PE. PortCo work is becoming much more imporatnt and the financial-toolkit is loosing its moat significantly with the rise of AI. Just imagine trying to get into financial/LBO modelling in 2015 vs. now. Barriers are so much lower and you can learn so much faster and iterate through by using AI.
Based on the most helpful WSO content, here's how the comparison stacks up:
Investment Banking (IB) Exits:
MBB PE Due Diligence (DD) Exits:
Key Considerations:
Conclusion:
If your primary goal is to land a buy-side role in PE or HF, sticking with the MM IB offer is the safer bet. MBB consulting, even in PE DD groups, is less likely to lead to those exits, though it offers a better lifestyle and broader industry opportunities. If you're prioritizing culture and hours over guaranteed buy-side exits, MBB could be worth considering.
Sources: Q&A: Big Four Valuation Associate - Deciding Whether This Job Is Right For You, https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forum/investment-banking/eb-vs-bb-long-term-and-exits?customgpt=1, Q&A: Big Four Valuation Associate - Deciding Whether This Job Is Right For You, Investment Banking vs Management Consulting in Italy
I think why comparisons are hard is because in MBB, you don’t get assigned to a “group” like PE due diligence in the same way you are assigned a group in IB. You’re a general consultant who gets staffed on different teams so there’s no guarantee that you’ll be on any PE due diligence in your 2 year stint.
That said, I have some friends who went the consulting route in the states and if you know your end state is PE, you can be proactive about networking internally to help assigned PE due diligence staffings.
Amet ut esse soluta odio voluptate. Dolor nesciunt excepturi ut ut. Voluptatum dolor enim occaecati et sunt possimus molestiae.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...